If Floyd beats Mosley, is it better than Pacquiao's win over Cotto?
Collapse
-
-
exactly....ppl look at age, as the determining factor of whether a fighter is prime or not.
i personally look at a decline in skills more. i think the mosley of today beats the cotto of today.....regardless of how old they are.Comment
-
-
I scored the first fight a draw. And, if they fight right now or later in the year. I would predict Shane to beat Cotto. I think Shane could stop him...
I also hate when people try to use age as a way to determine prime....Comment
-
Cotto beat Mosley straight up. I know it was close but a win is a win. So,if Mayweather beats Shane,he wouldnt be doing something special,Cotto did it too.Comment
-
Obviously we can't say for certain until we see what kind of shape Shane is in on May 1st but I might have him just edging Pacquiao's Cotto right now going off what I know. I think while, yes, Shane is past his best, he's also adopted a slightly more dynamic approach and is kind of embracing his age rather than letting it drag him down. Plus you just cannot argue with that win over Margarito.Comment
-
Stat-wise...
W over Mosley, obviously.
Based on rankings at time of fight, and actual belt(s) held.
Cotto was a bit past-prime, as Shane is today.
I voted for a Mosley win, based on a cold-stats POV.
However, the NATURE of the win counts, in the broader
sense of boxing as a spectator sport:
If all Floyd can manage is a potshotting SD or UD victory,
then Pac's pulping of Cotto still rules, in the public eyeComment
Comment