Comments Thread For: Weights: Chris Arreola 250.5, Tomasz Adamek 217
Collapse
-
-
Muscle weighs more than fat and I'll take bigpoppapums report of a more "defined" looking Arreola over your assumptions.Comment
-
Wins at LHW and CW mean little at HW man, you should know that. Do you think any of Adamek's opponents at those lower weights except MAYBE Cunningham, would be able to beat Arreola?Adamek is 6-1 in world title fights in two different weight divisions. And during this process he has beaten five fighters in six fights that where ranked in the top ten by Ring Magazine at the time. And his only lose was to a fighter many believe to be the best LHW on the planet. To be fair I also looked up Arreola's opponents and should any one be surprised that his only opponent ranked by Ring magazine was the one who beat his a$$. So, I will have to ask which fighters resume seems better, and also how many titles has the "Nightmare" won?Comment
-
Thats amazing buddy, its never good to be heavy even if it is muscle. Who do you think is the fighter lighter on their feet? Arreola or Adamek? Guess who is going to be outboxed? If Arreola hits air all night long, does that mean Adamek did excellent preparation for this fight if Arreola gets tired of punching air?Comment
-
-
-
You missing my point. I never even said Adamek would win I am simply stating that he has a much better record against a much higher quality of opponents regardless of the weight division than Chris does. Please explain to me what is so hard to understand about that or how anyone can honestly even dispute that fact? And I will say this and this just my opinion. One fact that seems to be overlooked is that regardless if Chris comes in at 230 or 280 he really is not that skilled of a fighter and I think the Vitali fight proved that fact.Comment
-
Confirmed. I'll add it to my bets thread.
Good luck! I'm rooting for Adamek, so I hope you win.
I've made a lot of bets on Arreola - winning all the bets will help to ease my pain when I see one of my favorites (Adamek) getting beaten up and stopped.
Comment
-
Again you are comparing fighters that have and never will fight in the HW division and title holders don't mean anything. 2 of those fights were against superstar All time great Paul Briggs who has 1 fight in 4 years after adamek and Adamek squeeked by on two majority decisions. Then you got a win over the Immortal Thomas Ulrich who's last fight was for the well respected WBO international title. Then of coarse he got out classed by dawson but did have his one solid win against Cuningham. But then followed it up with first ballot hall of famers Johnathan Banks and Bobby gun.Adamek is 6-1 in world title fights in two different weight divisions. And during this process he has beaten five fighters in six fights that where ranked in the top ten by Ring Magazine at the time. And his only lose was to a fighter many believe to be the best LHW on the planet. To be fair I also looked up Arreola's opponents and should any one be surprised that his only opponent ranked by Ring magazine was the one who beat his a$$. So, I will have to ask which fighters resume seems better, and also how many titles has the "Nightmare" won?
Just because they are titleholders/contenders doesn't make them world beaters. ****t I could go on about this all day if I wanted to.Comment
-
Thats amazing buddy, its never good to be heavy even if it is muscle. Who do you think is the fighter lighter on their feet? Arreola or Adamek? Guess who is going to be outboxed? If Arreola hits air all night long, does that mean Adamek did excellent preparation for this fight if Arreola gets tired of punching air?
My question to you is when in the *** did Adamek become a slick fighter?Comment

Comment