If floyd beats shane, is it a better win than manny's win against barrera?

[riannu]

F**k no,

MAB got his @ss kicked by someone who ended up becoming a legend in his own right, while old @ss Shane was feasting on the likes of Fernando Vargas, Ricardo Mayorga and Antonia Margarita, not exactly 1st ballot HOFers, guys.

You might be a *******, but there's no reason to disrespect Mosley. He also fought prime DLH, Winky and Forrest. And the most dominant 135 lbr since Whitaker. And that margarito was the #1 ranked WW at the time. Just don't post if you got nothing to contribute.

[shekwan]

If I remember correctly, both Barerra and Morales were Top 10 P4P when Pac fought them...like 5 & 6 at time.

[street bully]

it would 'nt even be a betterr win than pac's W vs cotto..........

This .

[MOTHER DUCKER]

If I remember correctly, both Barerra and Morales were Top 10 P4P when Pac fought them...like 5 & 6 at time.

I would have thought being dominated by a pretty average fighter would have knocked Morales out of the TOP p4p but then again boxing lists generally mean jack **** and are full of bias. I can't believe anyone suggest that a win over Morales 2nd or 3rd fight>a Win over the current WW champ

[Ryannn]

poll added, bitches

[-Spinal-]

um... beating only mosley doesn't equal and isn't better than wins over mab, jmm, and morales.

With Cotto, Clottey, DLH, and a win over Mosley Pacquiao can retire. I never said Mosley can be the only name on Pacquiao's resume. I'm saying he can trade a Mosley win for a win over those 3 and it is better. Mosley is a much dangerous fight than those 3...prime or not, end of story, it's my opinion and I don't even want to debate that to tell you the truth. I know what i'm talking about when I say Mosley is better than those 3 guys.

With Cotto, Clottey, DLH, and Mosley...Floyd will be favored over all 4 of them(as you know already he was favored against a healthier 154 DLH and now he's favored against a #1 WW Mosley). Those are not great wins for Floyd, he's held to higher standards because he's better than Pacquiao.

[BigStereotype]

dude, margartio is a prize fighter. he' knos he needs to concentrate to win his fights, ur excuses for him are dumb, espceially considering he never came out and made any himself. i never get why ppl make excuses for others when they dont offer them up.

He's also a fighter who clearly needs to be in a very specific state of mind to fight effectively. He's just as much of a mental fighter as Floyd is, just in a different way. If you disrupt that, he's very vulnerable.

[MOTHER DUCKER]

He's also a fighter who clearly needs to be in a very specific state of mind to fight effectively. He's just as much of a mental fighter as Floyd is, just in a different way. If you disrupt that, he's very vulnerable.

Im not sure if i agree with that but still 10/10 if Mosley applies that style there is nothing Margarito will really be able to do too counter it, it was just a perfect fight by Richardson/Mosley.

[daggum]

With Cotto, Clottey, DLH, and a win over Mosley Pacquiao can retire. I never said Mosley can be the only name on Pacquiao's resume. I'm saying he can trade a Mosley win for a win over those 3 and it is better. Mosley is a much dangerous fight than those 3...prime or not, end of story, it's my opinion and I don't even want to debate that to tell you the truth. I know what i'm talking about when I say Mosley is better than those 3 guys.

With Cotto, Clottey, DLH, and Mosley...Floyd will be favored over all 4 of them(as you know already he was favored against a healthier 154 DLH and now he's favored against a #1 WW Mosley). Those are not great wins for Floyd, he's held to higher standards because he's better than Pacquiao.

but pac is the number 1 welterweight not 38 year old mosley. its your body of work that creates a ranking not 1 fight where you have a good style matchup. thus pac is 1.

[SkillspayBills]

Ummmmmm, I would have to say no. For one Manny was the underdog, moreoverhe was closer to his prime than Shane is now.