Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can someone explain the story or rationale of Floyd only wanting the WBC belts?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by yesir View Post
    i posted already ass. WBC belt>>>>all the other trinkets
    Hey yesir, is this you?

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by yesir View Post
      i posted already ass. WBC belt>>>>all the other trinkets
      If I recall correctly you called it the "official" belt. What makes it "official"?
      answer jab's question ***** or shut up!

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by daggum View Post
        the wbc is the official belt cause floyd says so. we all know if floyd said the wba or ibf was the official belt everyone would be like no floyd you are talking out of your ass its the wbc. right?
        You stole my thunder lol! Green K given. It's funny watching Floyd's little Muppets around here parrot whatever their boy says as if it was given to Moses on Mt. Sinai

        Poet

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by daggum View Post
          the only reason is because the wbc has been around the longest which means it has brought boxing the most dishonesty and corruption. that might be why floyd considers it offical cause it represents him perfectly.
          Originally posted by shadeyfizzle View Post
          The irony in this thread is that the *****s come out to bash pacquiao and the philippines and defend floyd's fetish for the wbc belt when the WBC was created in the Philippines and the 1st president of the organization filipino.
          Originally posted by loui_ludwig View Post
          11 countries established and created the WBC in Mexico, not Philippines.
          Originally posted by shadeyfizzle View Post
          yes...its inception was in mexico, but it's 1st headquarters was in the philippines.
          That's one nice trivia there...


          Originally posted by yesir View Post
          i posted already ass. WBC belt>>>>all the other trinkets
          LOL at this idiot!
          Never fails to owns himself even in his own thread that even his fellow *****s disowns him!

          Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
          You stole my thunder lol! Green K given. It's funny watching Floyd's little Muppets around here parrot whatever their boy says as if it was given to Moses on Mt. Sinai

          Poet
          What else we going to expect from ******s? They don't have the capacity to think thus they just parrot what floyd says as they think he is god!




          Now they're trying to avoid the thread except for the morons like this idiot yesir.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by MurderDeathKill View Post
            Who knows? It's just his thing. Belts ain't that important at this point in his career. That said, I'm surprised he don't want Shane's WBA belt since he could add 1 more statistic trying to catch up to Pac.
            what statistic would that be?
            He already was WW champ. Floyd will have to win the lineal championship in another division to equal pac's feat of 4 lineals. That's the only stat that should matter.

            Comment


            • #66
              To answer the TS's question, like other posters have mentioned
              out of all the trinkets the WBC has the most legacy and prestige.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by DuttyAlacrity View Post
                To answer the TS's question, like other posters have mentioned
                out of all the trinkets the WBC has the most legacy and prestige.
                No the WBA has the most legacy, and no belt today really holds any prestige. Its the fighter who makes the belt, not the other way around.
                Last edited by JAB5239; 04-21-2010, 01:25 PM.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Well he never seemed that intrested in the ring belt so maybe he just likes the bling on the WBC belt.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
                    No the WBA has the most legacy, and no belt today really holds any prestige. Its the fighter who makes the belt, not the other way around.
                    That could be argued, but the WBC incorporates the NYSAC and EBU (or IBU) both of which have been active before the NBA. They were the only organization that actually incorporated reps from different countries in it's inception, so the WBC has more legacy. The WBA also has a super champ, an undisputed super champ, a regular champ and if i'm not mistaken an interim champ... the WBC is not that much better... but in the land of the blind...

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by riannu View Post
                      So many moronic poster. Just to educate you:

                      WBC belt is NOT the belt.

                      There are several champions. One is a lineal, another is titlist. For a boxing historian, lineal champion is what matters.

                      Definition of terms;

                      lineal = the champion, the man of the division. Oh and just to clarify the ring champion is not the lineal champion, although it is usually the case.

                      titlist = person who gets a piece of the four sanctioning bodies belt.

                      Ideally, with one belt per division, the lineal is also the titlist. However with four title per divisions, it gets complicated. The WBA was the oldest organization, followed by the WBC, IBF then WBO.

                      How to become the lineal champion?

                      There are two generally accepted way. One is to beat the current lineal champion. Now the lineal champion might have a belt, or he might not have. Doesn't matter. The lineage stays with that person so long he's not defeated, vacated or dead.

                      There are times when there is no lineal champion because he moved up in weight, died or voluntarily vacates or retire. The second way to became the champion is to arrange a fight between the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd ranked fighters of that division. Again, it doest matter if these ranked fighters are titlist, so long as they are universally recognized the best fighters of that division. Nowadays it is also becoming acceptable that a fight between the 1st and 2nd ranked fighter determines the lineal champ.

                      Now lets fo back to Pacquiao's case. The reason he's a 7-div world champ is because:

                      1. 112 = lineal, WBC champ.
                      2. 122 = IBF champ
                      3. 126 = lineal, no sanctioning belt
                      4. 130 = lineal, WBC
                      5. 135 = WBC
                      6. 140 = lineal, no sanctioning belt
                      7. 147 = WBO

                      For a boxing purist, he is 4-division champ. That are the divisions where he is lineal. Coincidentally, two of these division he did not held any belt. The lineal champs he defeated, Barrera and Hatton, does not have belts.
                      You're even a bigger moron for writing such a long post because daggum is a Floyd hater and was just being sarcastic.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP