When has Arreola's really affected any of his fights.
Collapse
-
Comment
-
you're 100% right and I apologize to Pull a bit
prior to working with Hudson he and largely did his nutrition (which was really none) and training on his own.
now that he has a conditioning coach in place while the weight has still been an issue his technique and ability to delivery punches has improved more and more
in the gym for this camp you can see him slowly starting to become more athletic than prior where he would come forward and **** until they submit. He is actually using angles and footwork
but to say someone is out of shape solely based on their appearance really is confusing considering Juan Diaz NEVER looked in shape and I dare say he had the best stamina of any at 135 while he was reigning over that division
he should be around 240 for this fight
Juan Diaz is another guy that people tend to overexaggerate about. The guys was a chubby kid as a youngster and when he boxed he got in phenomenal shape but his body just didn't look the part.
people just fail to grasp that some people no matter how hard they work will just never have a hard body.Comment
-
you're 100% right and I apologize to Pull a bit
prior to working with Hudson he and largely did his nutrition (which was really none) and training on his own.
now that he has a conditioning coach in place while the weight has still been an issue his technique and ability to delivery punches has improved more and more
in the gym for this camp you can see him slowly starting to become more athletic than prior where he would come forward and **** until they submit. He is actually using angles and footwork
but to say someone is out of shape solely based on their appearance really is confusing considering Juan Diaz NEVER looked in shape and I dare say he had the best stamina of any at 135 while he was reigning over that division
he should be around 240 for this fight
Not looking "ripped" has never meant that the fighter doesn't have stamina in my mind, one of the most energetic fighters I ever saw was the seemingly out of shape Rocky Rivera who fought in the 1960's.
I agree with you Chris wasn't in "ideal" shape, and even at 240 he's not in "ideal" shape either.
But my point again is when people call him a fat slob they are being pompus ***ing asses who are just hating on the guy for the shallowist of reasons.
Like you mentioned Shannon briggs is this giant of a man with huge perfect muscles and washboard six pack infested stomech but make him throw more than 20 punches in a round and hes a weezing mess of a man who reminds me of my dad trying to work out.
By looking at him would you really think Arreola has twice the cardio that Briggs has??Last edited by TheGreatA; 04-20-2010, 01:42 PM.Comment
-
if we are talking about conditioning Diaz was as in shape as he could possibly be whether at 130 or 135.
He certainly should have never gone up to 140. However that doesn't have as much to do with his shape as it does about the current practise of fighters going down to the lowest weight possible in order to have a size advantage. A lot of the time that can drain a fighter too.
Not looking "ripped" has never meant that the fighter doesn't have stamina in my mind, one of the most energetic fighters I ever saw was the seemingly out of shape Rocky Rivera who fought in the 1960's.
It may not be ideal but it is more ideal for sure. I agree completely about Briggs, and think that in general the overly muscled fighters actually lack stamina. The bodybuilder look is not one I'd recommend a professional boxer to go for.
I will say this. Just going by condition alone, the Arreola of today outlasts the Arreola who weighed 229 against Wills and possibly stops that versionComment
-
but that's a different beast altogether. Here you are using weight as an advantage or disadvantage in regard to the opponents he faces NOT for the stamina or condition Diaz was in.
if we are talking about conditioning Diaz was as in shape as he could possibly be whether at 130 or 135.
you just answered your own reply
how is it more ideal? a boxer can indeed be in better shape and still move up in weight.
I will say this. Just going by condition alone, the Arreola of today outlasts the Arreola who weighed 229 against Wills and possibly stops that version
I agree with this Arreola is without a doubt a much better fighter now than he was 3 or 4 years ago.Last edited by pistol whip; 04-20-2010, 01:53 PM.Comment
-
but that's a different beast altogether. Here you are using weight as an advantage or disadvantage in regard to the opponents he faces NOT for the stamina or condition Diaz was in.
if we are talking about conditioning Diaz was as in shape as he could possibly be whether at 130 or 135.
you just answered your own reply
Looks do not determine your conditioning and I've stated that from the beginning.
how is it more ideal? a boxer can indeed be in better shape and still move up in weight.
I will say this. Just going by condition alone, the Arreola of today outlasts the Arreola who weighed 229 against Wills and possibly stops that versionComment
-
I don't get this topic, the whole point of boxing is to come in the best shape possible and for Arreola that is definitely at around 240-235. So he can be quick and faster, just like Solis should lose weight aswell. This isn't a dumb MMA fight where you can use your weight to advantage. You have to actually land on your opponent. I hate MMA.Comment
-
Directly, it hasn't. But it's common sense. The guy would inherently be a better fighter if he was in better shape.Comment
-
Comment
Comment