Manny Pacquiao Humanitarian... I Think Not

[WarriorSoul]

So you think it's o.k. to contribute to the abuses of the impoverished while athletes make millions and giant corporations make billions, when something could be done to stop these abuses and set guidelines for wages and fair treatment of employees, just because it's "Good for the economy"?How is it good when a few at the top are getting rich, while the poor are abused and left with scraps? Please explain.

STFU and make me a 5 pairs of Nike's before your ass get's caned...

[-The Glove-]

So you think it's o.k. to contribute to the abuses of the impoverished while athletes make millions and giant corporations make billions, when something could be done to stop these abuses and set guidelines for wages and fair treatment of employees, just because it's "Good for the economy"?How is it good when a few at the top are getting rich, while the poor are abused and left with scraps? Please explain.

I bet you have a closet full of **** made in sweatshops. People ***** about this stuff, but how much would you be willing to pay for your clothes and accessories. Columbia makes **** in my home country, and I'm happy, because it gives my people jobs that pay better than they normally would be able to get.

[LeeVanCleef]

So you think it's o.k. to contribute to the abuses of the impoverished while athletes make millions and giant corporations make billions, when something could be done to stop these abuses and set guidelines for wages and fair treatment of employees, just because it's "Good for the economy"?How is it good when a few at the top are getting rich, while the poor are abused and left with scraps? Please explain.

Communism is good for like-minded idiots like you .
Now get back to work, DRONE!

[Young Money]

I bet you have a closet full of **** made in sweatshops. People ***** about this stuff, but how much would you be willing to pay for your clothes and accessories. Columbia makes **** in my home country, and I'm happy, because it gives my people jobs that pay better than they normally would be able to get.

TS response: But, but Manny Pacquiao... wah wah wah

[rskumm21]

I bet you have a closet full of **** made in sweatshops. People ***** about this stuff, but how much would you be willing to pay for your clothes and accessories. Columbia makes **** in my home country, and I'm happy, because it gives my people jobs that pay better than they normally would be able to get.

So then by your logic slavery was good since it gave people work that they otherwise would not have gotten. I mean, at least it gave them a job to do right? They should have been grateful instead of upset that they were being abused.

[check hook]

So you think it's o.k. to contribute to the abuses of the impoverished while athletes make millions and giant corporations make billions, when something could be done to stop these abuses and set guidelines for wages and fair treatment of employees, just because it's "Good for the economy"?How is it good when a few at the top are getting rich, while the poor are abused and left with scraps? Please explain.

Free trade is beneficial to both economies.......Nike outsourcing labour to a country where it is cheaper creates "jobs" in that country. In turn it reduces Nike's cost of labour and you don't have to go pay $100 for a t-shirt. It's about competitive advantage........you don't compete in an area where you are inferior.

[check hook]

So then by your logic slavery was good since it gave people work that they otherwise would not have gotten. I mean, at least it gave them a job to do right? They should have been grateful instead of upset that they were being abused.

slavery and this issue are not the comparable......slavery was one of the US greatest mistakes throughout it's entire modern history.....anyway....this is lounge material.

[Maidana vs Rios]

gotdamn u mfers are desperate lol

[rskumm21]

Free trade is beneficial to both economies.......Nike outsourcing labour to a country where it is cheaper creates "jobs" in that country. In turn it reduces Nike's cost of labour and you don't have to go pay $100 for a t-shirt. It's about competitive advantage........you don't compete in an area where you are inferior.

Yet you pay $150 for a pair of sneakers that cost them $5 to manufacture... What you are speaking of can still be accomplished without the high level of greed where a select group at the top benefit the most.

[F l i c k e r]

This is mighty gay.

But I find it mighty gay-er, that obsessed pacquiao fans can't find words to elaborate their thoughts. It's basically "*****, ****** dumbass *****, *****."

Really, education much?