Manny Pacquiao Humanitarian... I Think Not

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rskumm21
    Banned
    • Dec 2008
    • 2640
    • 199
    • 175
    • 3,033

    #31
    Originally posted by snd_dsigner_dan
    TS is grasping for straws. Many Nike athletes have done many humanitarian efforts throughout the world. Are you saying they're hypocrites too? It's a fact that Nike uses sweatshops but if you're gonna put the blame on someone put it on Nike, not Manny.
    Originally posted by Gutz
    Reebok uses the same sweat shops
    Again, lets stop trying to put the focus on other people here to justify the fact that Manny Pacquiao knowingly supports this inhumane process, yet puts on this facade that he's a humanitarian. A true Humanitarian would not support this.

    Comment

    • carts
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2009
      • 3378
      • 106
      • 109
      • 9,758

      #32
      Originally posted by rskumm21
      Again, lets stop trying to put the focus on other people here to justify the fact that Manny Pacquiao knowingly supports this inhumane process, yet puts on this facade that he's a humanitarian. A true Humanitarian would not support this.
      how did you know pac knows about these sweatshops idiot!!!

      Comment

      • rskumm21
        Banned
        • Dec 2008
        • 2640
        • 199
        • 175
        • 3,033

        #33
        Originally posted by carts
        what is your point idiot?? why blame pac for nike's sweatshops???? does pac even know about these sweat shops before he signed his contract with nike????
        The point is that Manny Pacquiao is a hypocrite who does enough to make people believe he is a humanitarian, when in reality all he cares about is himself.

        Comment

        • carts
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2009
          • 3378
          • 106
          • 109
          • 9,758

          #34
          Originally posted by rskumm21
          The point is that Manny Pacquiao is a hypocrite who does enough to make people believe he is a humanitarian, when in reality all he cares about is himself.
          to justify your claim about pac u made the point about these nike sweatshops???

          ur a facking idiotic poster!

          Comment

          • check hook
            Gay Pride
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jan 2010
            • 9361
            • 379
            • 137
            • 16,005

            #35
            Originally posted by carts
            how did you know pac knows about these sweatshops idiot!!!


            it's moot.....people see the conditions of work in those sweatshops and cry foul......do they realise the conditions in 99% of other labourious jobs in these countries is worse and they get paid less......

            sweatshops = good for these people.


            modern economic theory 101 people............FREE TRADE = GOOD. Sweatshop = free trade at work.

            Comment

            • tibbar
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2006
              • 2725
              • 83
              • 83
              • 9,166

              #36
              theres really no cure for idiocy because idiots dont believe they are one.

              Comment

              • Young Money
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Feb 2010
                • 1924
                • 159
                • 78
                • 11,394

                #37
                Don't argue with idiots.

                They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

                Comment

                • carts
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2009
                  • 3378
                  • 106
                  • 109
                  • 9,758

                  #38
                  Originally posted by check hook
                  it's moot.....people see the conditions of work in those sweatshops and cry foul......do they realise the conditions in 99% of other labourious jobs in these countries is worse and they get paid less......

                  sweatshops = good for these people.


                  modern economic theory 101 people............FREE TRADE = GOOD. Sweatshop = free trade at work.
                  yeah TS believe its an awful thing and doesnt know its a good thing in general..

                  Comment

                  • WarriorSoul
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 2064
                    • 399
                    • 303
                    • 9,795

                    #39
                    Originally posted by tibbar
                    theres really no cure for idiocy because idiots dont believe they are one.
                    It's like the story about the village idiot who couldn't figure out exactly who the village idiot was, and he was convinced everyone around him was ******..

                    Comment

                    • rskumm21
                      Banned
                      • Dec 2008
                      • 2640
                      • 199
                      • 175
                      • 3,033

                      #40
                      Originally posted by check hook
                      Free trade is good for developing economies. Those working in nike sweatshops earn more money than the average wage in their countries anyway......there is a reason they only ever show images and footage.....no interviews........those ppl like working there......what other option do they have.

                      Free trade is good for small and developing nations and for the world.....it creates jobs and economic growth....don't let anyone fool you. You rarely go to war with a country you trade with extensively.
                      So you think it's o.k. to contribute to the abuses of the impoverished while athletes make millions and giant corporations make billions, when something could be done to stop these abuses and set guidelines for wages and fair treatment of employees, just because it's "Good for the economy"?How is it good when a few at the top are getting rich, while the poor are abused and left with scraps? Please explain.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP