Why the criticism over berto Flaws but
Collapse
-
-
He was off for 11 months and then throw the tragedy on top pf that. Then mix in Quintana's slick lefty style.
Then you have the recipe for what you seen Saturday.Comment
-
Ok e en if I give you that(which I'm not buying by the way).Whats the reason he look bad(and got a home cook meal)against Collazo?I think he party and drinks to much(the same thing I blame for Cotto slide downwards)and does not take his his craft seriously.He gets by of talent alone.I don't see him beatimg a top WW.Comment
-
No, I wouldn't. Mosley dominated Collazo.
The question is about his flaws, not about whether or not he's green. If his flaws are because he's green then cool, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.
This is just a silly excuse. Plenty of guys look good against southpaws. Cotto destroyed Quintana and looked fantastic doing it.
There are some guys who struggle with slick fighters, sure. But I think the issue here is that Quintana and Collazo are the only quality opponents Berto has faced, not that they are the only skilled southpaws.
Even with a weight advantage, Berto was less impressive against Urango than Hatton was. Why? Because of quality, not because of style.
The fight with Quintana and Cotto was competitive before Cotto landed that knockout punch to the body which look like to me it landed in Quintana back which is illegal.
And Pacquiao has struggled against bums numerous times.He even got dropped twice in his career by bums.Comment
-
You talking about a Judah who hardly threw any punches cause his confidence was shot up.
Why don`t you use an example where a fighter throws back and is atleast a decent fighter.Comment
-
It doesn`t erase the flaws Pacquiao has and Pacquiao has struggled against bums numerous times.Comment
Comment