Rebuttal thread

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Hate Giver
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2010
    • 1217
    • 109
    • 41
    • 1,373

    #31
    Originally posted by JAB5239


    Actually it was pretty funny and damn accurate of whats happening to Pac.
    its utterly disgusting. At least lets wait for a smoking gun. There's none. NOt a single iota of steroid evidence against pac.

    Not a disgruntled ex trainer with bloody gauzes a la brian mcnamee w/ clemens , not a steroid using expert a la jose canseco w/mcgwire , not a steroid manufacturer a la victor conter w/ shane. Nothing.

    Even disgruntled ex trainers like justin fortune & michael moore who would have a ax to grind with roach & pac flat out said that Pac does not use steroids.

    The *****s alleged smoking gun is pac & floyd disagreeing on the cut off dates.

    Comment

    • The Hate Giver
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2010
      • 1217
      • 109
      • 41
      • 1,373

      #32
      Originally posted by JAB5239
      Thats what Im saying too. But Many of Floyds fans feel the need to make up this conspiracy because Pac didn't take the test. Out of the list from the first o=post I've already dispelled 5 of the names. The remaining one I just don't know and was asking for proof in the other thread only to be put on ignore when no one could give me an answer.
      another false ***** propaganda uncovered.

      Comment

      • Modobo3
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Sep 2009
        • 256
        • 16
        • 7
        • 6,608

        #33
        What's up Pac fans...I told myself months ago that I'd back off of the May/Pac stuff...but appears that I just can't resist getting re-engaged. Hopefully I can get some intelligent back and forth...

        My question...Why is it so important to FIRST have evidence BEFORE Pac can even be SUSPECTED of PED use? ...and as a followup - Hasn't there been adequate evidence to imply that he might POSSIBLY be on some type of PED - Based on his, Roach, Ariza and Arum's responses to taking or not taking the OST's?

        I can understand the outrage when he is outright accused of being GUILTY - BTW...I agree that he is innocent UNTIL proven guilty - but the level of outrage because he was simply asked to take tests, is very hard to understand. I don't think any boxer is above being asked to take the tests and when they've changed their position as many times as Pac and his his team has, it's hard to give them the benefit of the doubt.

        Peace MO!

        Comment

        • JAB5239
          Dallas Cowboys
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 28300
          • 5,349
          • 4,522
          • 73,018

          #34
          Originally posted by Modobo3
          What's up Pac fans...I told myself months ago that I'd back off of the May/Pac stuff...but appears that I just can't resist getting re-engaged. Hopefully I can get some intelligent back and forth...

          My question...Why is it so important to FIRST have evidence BEFORE Pac can even be SUSPECTED of PED use? ...and as a followup - Hasn't there been adequate evidence to imply that he might POSSIBLY be on some type of PED - Based on his, Roach, Ariza and Arum's responses to taking or not taking the OST's?

          I can understand the outrage when he is outright accused of being GUILTY - BTW...I agree that he is innocent UNTIL proven guilty - but the level of outrage because he was simply asked to take tests, is very hard to understand. I don't think any boxer is above being asked to take the tests and when they've changed their position as many times as Pac and his his team has, it's hard to give them the benefit of the doubt.

          Peace MO!
          Assuming and suspecting are fine, but convicting with no proof is absurd.

          Im curious what you think of the very first post in this thread. Roach is being tried and convicted in a court of public lies in relation to what I responded to. It was said that he trained 10 fighters who have failed tests. I've dismissed 6 of them with facts and nobody is answering about the rest. What are your thoughts on that?

          Comment

          • IMDAZED
            Fair but Firm
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2006
            • 42644
            • 1,134
            • 1,770
            • 67,152

            #35
            Originally posted by Modobo3
            What's up Pac fans...I told myself months ago that I'd back off of the May/Pac stuff...but appears that I just can't resist getting re-engaged. Hopefully I can get some intelligent back and forth...

            My question...Why is it so important to FIRST have evidence BEFORE Pac can even be SUSPECTED of PED use? ...and as a followup - Hasn't there been adequate evidence to imply that he might POSSIBLY be on some type of PED - Based on his, Roach, Ariza and Arum's responses to taking or not taking the OST's?

            I can understand the outrage when he is outright accused of being GUILTY - BTW...I agree that he is innocent UNTIL proven guilty - but the level of outrage because he was simply asked to take tests, is very hard to understand. I don't think any boxer is above being asked to take the tests and when they've changed their position as many times as Pac and his his team has, it's hard to give them the benefit of the doubt.

            Peace MO!
            Love how much of your post was just blown over.

            Comment

            • JAB5239
              Dallas Cowboys
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 28300
              • 5,349
              • 4,522
              • 73,018

              #36
              Originally posted by IMDAZED
              Love how much of your post was just blown over.

              Why shouldn't it be, thats not what this thread was started about. Im still waiting for proof of all these failed drug tests that was claimed yet no one is chirping up.

              Comment

              • IMDAZED
                Fair but Firm
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2006
                • 42644
                • 1,134
                • 1,770
                • 67,152

                #37
                Originally posted by JAB5239

                Why shouldn't it be, thats not what this thread was started about. Im still waiting for proof of all these failed drug tests that was claimed yet no one is chirping up.
                Yeah but what he wrote cuts right to the heart of the matter. The other stuff is just side dishes.

                Comment

                • JAB5239
                  Dallas Cowboys
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 28300
                  • 5,349
                  • 4,522
                  • 73,018

                  #38
                  Originally posted by JAB5239
                  how many fighters has roach trained that have tested positive for steroids?

                  help me fill in the list we got 10 so far

                  1. James toney
                  2. Michael moorer
                  3. Holyfield
                  4. Ortiz
                  5. Liddell
                  6. salido
                  7 Rourke
                  8. Stallone

                  9. Rijker
                  10. Kirill Sidelnikov
                  __________________

                  Since I was put on ignore in a cowardly fashion in the previous thread I figured I start my own.

                  Same questions. Who from this list actually tested positive to make anybody think that Roach should be made out to look like the bad guy as the post above suggests. We know Stallone and Rourke are actors, scratch them from the list. We know Salido passed av drug test by a private lab (just like Floyd wants) when he failed the NSAC test, which Floyd and his fans call unreliable to begin with. Sorry fellla's, can't have it both ways. Scratch Salida. We know Holy has never tested positive though I do think he probably used PED's myself. That said...no proof, he shouldn't be tied to Freddie to make him look bad. Rijker?...I don't know. Moorer?...if so I never heard about it. Anyone got anything on Moorer? Liddell is MMA and I never heard he failed a test either. Anybody? That leaves Ortiz and Toney. Sorry never heard of the last guy. That is not a good thing, but considering how many people Roach trains....can we really use this against Roach?


                  Originally posted by IMDAZED
                  Yeah but what he wrote cuts right to the heart of the matter. The other stuff is just side dishes.
                  That is a whole other debate. Now I am asking you respectfully, can you or can you not provide proof of failed drug tests in boxing from everbody on this list except Toney? If you can we can pick it up from there. If you can't you should see the point I have been making all along, and it has nothing to do with Manny.
                  Last edited by JAB5239; 04-13-2010, 02:48 PM.

                  Comment

                  • JAB5239
                    Dallas Cowboys
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 28300
                    • 5,349
                    • 4,522
                    • 73,018

                    #39
                    Originally posted by JAB5239
                    [/B]



                    That is a whole other debate. Now I am asking you respectfully, can you or can you not provide proof of failed drug tests in boxing from everbody on this list except Toney? If you can we can pick it up from there. If you can't you should see the point I have been making all along, and it has nothing to do with Manny.
                    We can scratch number 10 off the list too. He's an MMA fighter with minor affiliations to Roach.

                    Thats about 70% of this list that I've proven either didn't fail a test or have minor associations with Roach thru another sport. All this yet *****s were clinging to this list last night like Roach was responsible for PED's being the scourge of sports.

                    Comment

                    • Modobo3
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 256
                      • 16
                      • 7
                      • 6,608

                      #40
                      Originally posted by JAB5239
                      Assuming and suspecting are fine, but convicting with no proof is absurd.

                      Im curious what you think of the very first post in this thread. Roach is being tried and convicted in a court of public lies in relation to what I responded to. It was said that he trained 10 fighters who have failed tests. I've dismissed 6 of them with facts and nobody is answering about the rest. What are your thoughts on that?
                      In regards to this thread...Other than James Toney - Who happens to be one of my all-time faves...The list is mis-leading at best...It implies that Roach is directly aligned with steroid using athletes, therefore Pac must be a steroid using athlete...Which is wrong on so many levels...Those athletes might have steroid abusing backgrounds but I highly doubt that Roach advised them to use of PEDS as his means of getting prepared to fight...

                      Roach was aware of Toney's steroid use but claimed it was used for some medical reason...The sketchy part about that is the type of steroid that was used - STANZABOL (SP).

                      To stay on point...The Roach/Toney/Steroid association in an of itself isn't enough to warrant Pac taking the random OST's but that along with Pac, Ariza and Arums statements regarding whether or not to take the tests make him look very suspect in the very least...

                      ...and unfourtunately for Pac it's a very slippery slope from supect to guilty...

                      I don't think he taking PED's but he is being poorly advised...

                      ...and at this point I say take the tests, pass them, fight and let the chip fall where they may.

                      Peace Mo!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP