Is Floyd above the NSAC?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IMDAZED
    Fair but Firm
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2006
    • 42644
    • 1,134
    • 1,770
    • 67,152

    #91
    Originally posted by TortillaWarrior
    Its pretty simple.

    The fight is happening in their state.

    What is wrong with the sharing of information if you want the sport to be cleaner?

    I would think for those that claim they want the sport cleaned up, and at the same time claim the NSAC is incompetent because of their standards,

    they would be loving that drug testing agencies are willing to share information and at the same time, educate the commissions on how to do a better job.

    Isn't that what this is about in the first place?

    Cleaning up the sport.

    So, why are you guys against it?
    They have agreed to share the information - even though they don't have to.

    Comment

    • Vasyl’s dad
      He said no rematch
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2008
      • 23510
      • 1,120
      • 1,945
      • 50,072

      #92
      Originally posted by IMDAZED
      They have agreed to share the information - even though they don't have to.
      And?

      Thats not my point.

      I'm asking,

      why are Floyd fans upset with that?

      They should be all for it since they want the sport to be cleaned up so bad.

      Instead, they're acting as if something is wrong with it.

      Comment

      • IMDAZED
        Fair but Firm
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2006
        • 42644
        • 1,134
        • 1,770
        • 67,152

        #93
        Originally posted by TortillaWarrior
        And?

        Thats not my point.

        I'm asking,

        why are Floyd fans upset with that?

        They should be all for it since they want the sport to be cleaned up so bad.

        Instead, they're acting as if something is wrong with it.
        You see people upset with the fact that the USADA agreed months ago to hand over the results? Or do you see people rebutting those who want to pretend the NSAC is high and mighty and thus they HAVE to hand over the results?

        Comment

        • S.G.
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2008
          • 9412
          • 296
          • 635
          • 16,360

          #94
          Originally posted by TortillaWarrior

          If you or anyone else for that matter wants better testing to clean up the sport,

          you'd be in high favor of any testing agency working with the NSAC and all other state commissions.

          Thats the bottom line.

          If you have to question why its important that information be shared, or outright denounce the sharing of testing results,


          apparently you don't care much at all for cleaning up the sport.

          So, which is it?

          You're for better standards in regards to testing in boxing or not?
          Why is it important? What are the NSAC going to do with the results that they couldn't do if they just found out publicly along with everybody else?

          You are talking and talking but you're not saying anything. Why should I be in "high favour" of the USADA sharing the results with the NSAC when it makes no difference to anything? They haven't the wherewithal nor incentive to play a major role in revolutionising drug testing in boxing; hence why Mayweather has had to take it upon himself to ensure his opponents are clean. I believe that if and when top level boxing finally turns a corner in regards to anti-doping it will be the promotion companies that lead the way.

          Comment

          • B.U.R.N.E.R
            ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2010
            • 30186
            • 1,344
            • 400
            • 47,475

            #95
            Originally posted by S.G.
            Why is it important? What are the NSAC going to do with the results that they couldn't do if they just found out publicly along with everybody else?

            You are talking and talking but you're not saying anything. Why should I be in "high favour" of the USADA sharing the results with the NSAC when it makes no difference to anything? They haven't the wherewithal nor incentive to play a major role in revolutionising drug testing in boxing; hence why Mayweather has had to take it upon himself to ensure his opponents are clean. I believe that if and when top level boxing finally turns a corner in regards to anti-doping it will be the promotion companies that lead the way.
            You're wasting your time if it involves Mayweather that guy will always go the other way even when the argument is clear as hell.

            Comment

            • STRUGG
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2010
              • 7457
              • 199
              • 152
              • 7,745

              #96
              no he isnt pull........no fighter is.......................some guys just worship anything floyd says.......lol

              Comment

              • Ray*
                Be safe!!!
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2005
                • 44867
                • 1,654
                • 1,608
                • 558,890

                #97
                Ronnie nathanielsz is more concern about the test than the NSAC are.

                Comment

                • Eaner0919
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Nov 2004
                  • 8625
                  • 370
                  • 80
                  • 15,578

                  #98
                  I always thought the best way to end game Mayweather's side was to nip this in the bud, have his team of lawyers meet with NSAC, announce through Top Rank that they have contacted NSAC about possibly changing their drug testing, include the painkiller xylocaine in the requests, and tell Mayweather's side that they too are looking into changing the way testing is done.

                  then see who flinches

                  Comment

                  • B.U.R.N.E.R
                    ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2010
                    • 30186
                    • 1,344
                    • 400
                    • 47,475

                    #99
                    Originally posted by Eaner0919
                    I always thought the best way to end game Mayweather's side was to nip this in the bud, have his team of lawyers meet with NSAC, announce through Top Rank that they have contacted NSAC about possibly changing their drug testing, include the painkiller xylocaine in the requests, and tell Mayweather's side that they too are looking into changing the way testing is done.

                    then see who flinches
                    Xylocaine isnt a PED Though.

                    Comment

                    • Eaner0919
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Nov 2004
                      • 8625
                      • 370
                      • 80
                      • 15,578

                      #100
                      Originally posted by No Ceilings
                      Xylocaine isnt a PED Though.
                      doesn't have to be

                      never did I say PEDs bruh

                      however, if xylocaine is indeed not allowed in other states I would have advised NSAC of that and get them in contact with other states' athletic commissions to find out why.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP