Is Floyd above the NSAC?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Gambler1981
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2008
    • 25961
    • 520
    • 774
    • 49,039

    #121
    Originally posted by TortillaWarrior

    So what are you crying for then?

    I'm addressing people who have a problem with the information being shared and questioning why the NSAC needs/wants to see it.

    You fall into that category.


    You want the sport to be cleaner, so you say,


    but when things are done to do so,

    now you guys have a problem with it because Floyd is somehow involved.


    This sharing of information is for the betterment of the sport.

    You guys act like they are hiding information, not trying to gather it.
    I don't get what your point is, I am all for the sport being cleaner and have not changed that view in any way. I just do not see why NSAC needs to be involved aslong as their needs are met, if they want to get involved great for them.

    I just do not think it is that simple an issue for NSAC since if they do this for one fight/set of fighters they need to be able to do it for everyone since they are a government funded agency and that why I always though it was a shame arguement to use NSAC from the rip because they have a much bigger picture to look at and have constraints on what they are truly capable of.

    Comment

    • Vasyl’s dad
      He said no rematch
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2008
      • 23510
      • 1,120
      • 1,945
      • 50,072

      #122
      Originally posted by dans01234
      Why is it that Pacquiao fans are all the sudden all for the NSAC?

      Shouldn't we want decision making to be done for the good of boxing? Since when is drug testing a bad thing? It's not. Only Pacquiao fans who side with him blindly would look away.

      Take yourself out of being a fan of either fighter, and ask yourself.

      Is more drug testing in boxing a good thing?

      Should decisions be made based on what a commission wants or should they be based on what is the right thing?

      It's simple.

      Whether Floyd is a prick or not is irrelevant. Of course he's a prick. Sometimes at least. But why does that play more of a factor than what the actual issue is?
      What does Pacquiao have to do with this?

      We're boxing fans.

      Some info is being shared between a state commission and testing agency, two parties that have a role in this upcoming bout.


      Floyd fans appear to be upset with that.

      Comment

      • IMDAZED
        Fair but Firm
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2006
        • 42644
        • 1,134
        • 1,770
        • 67,152

        #123
        Man, I'm outta here. This dude is a clown.

        Comment

        • Ray*
          Be safe!!!
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2005
          • 44867
          • 1,654
          • 1,608
          • 558,890

          #124
          Originally posted by QUELOQUE
          Get with it or get lost.

          NSAC and all other commissions doing the testing is a conflict of interest, which is why third party testing is the way to go.

          If they start putting on stricter testing, they will lose out on their cut from fights (especially the big ones like Pacquiao's).

          The conflict of interest is too much for some of these commission to do anything, Imagine if the NSAC update their test and they caught one of their biggest boxer? What do you think they would do?

          Comment

          • B.U.R.N.E.R
            ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2010
            • 30186
            • 1,344
            • 400
            • 47,475

            #125
            I see great posters on here destroying this Tortilla Warrior troll. Good work.

            Comment

            • dans
              Journeyman
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jun 2006
              • 6835
              • 212
              • 134
              • 13,712

              #126
              Originally posted by TortillaWarrior
              What does Pacquiao have to do with this?

              We're boxing fans.

              Some info is being shared between a state commission and testing agency, two parties that have a role in this upcoming bout.


              Floyd fans appear to be upset with that.
              Pacquiao is what this all boils down to. It's the only reason it's an issue.

              Comment

              • Ray*
                Be safe!!!
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2005
                • 44867
                • 1,654
                • 1,608
                • 558,890

                #127
                Originally posted by TortillaWarrior
                What does Pacquiao have to do with this?

                We're boxing fans.

                Some info is being shared between a state commission and testing agency, two parties that have a role in this upcoming bout.


                Floyd fans appear to be upset with that.

                What this got to do with Floyd Mayweather fans?

                Comment

                • The Gambler1981
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2008
                  • 25961
                  • 520
                  • 774
                  • 49,039

                  #128
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED
                  Man, I'm outta here. This dude is a clown.
                  I was goign to tell you to not get involved since it is pretty much talking to a wall or Helen Keller (before she learned to communicate).

                  Comment

                  • STRUGG
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2010
                    • 7457
                    • 199
                    • 152
                    • 7,745

                    #129
                    Originally posted by Ray*

                    What this got to do with Floyd Mayweather fans?
                    cause they do the most complaining.....................

                    Comment

                    • Vasyl’s dad
                      He said no rematch
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 23510
                      • 1,120
                      • 1,945
                      • 50,072

                      #130
                      Originally posted by The Gambler1981
                      I don't get what your point is, I am all for the sport being cleaner and have not changed that view in any way. I just do not see why NSAC needs to be involved aslong as their needs are met, if they want to get involved great for them.

                      I just do not think it is that simple an issue for NSAC since if they do this for one fight/set of fighters they need to be able to do it for everyone since they are a government funded agency and that why I always though it was a shame arguement to use NSAC from the rip because they have a much bigger picture to look at and have constraints on what they are truly capable of.
                      What other fighter is demanding that his opponent take OSTs?

                      Yea, it might be a good idea to think about that first.



                      Why would the NSAC want to see results of other fights that don't have this type of testing?


                      They wouldn't, you know why?
                      Oh, maybe because there isn't any.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP