who is more over-rated? Bradley or Maidanna?

[Shattered Jaw]

i think its important you stick with facts rather then making things up.

polls on quite a few boxing forums actually had Barrera to win the fight and as soon a Khan won, he because a shot bum.


on Froch, even a nut-hugger like you should be able to admit he is as dirty as a cheap hooker. Pascal is a nobody, fact. he got out-boxed and out-classed by an old age pensioner who even manged to knock him out! the Direll fight was a joke, clearly lost it, under-hand rabbit puching, holding, pushing, throwing, attempted headbutts etc so there you have it, Froch a good entertainer but thats all

Khan did not beat Barrera LMFAO. Did you see the size of that cut? 30 stitches or something absolutely pouring blood.... yet they conveniently wait until the 5th round before they stop it.

DISGUSTING

How is Pascal a nobody you absolute tard? He's done far more in his career than Khan. He actually went in a 12 round war for a belt, didn't get KTFO out in the first round by a journeyman. Moved up a divison, beat a champ and defended twice with a very, very hard fight coming up against the consensus number 1 in the division in Chad Dawson.

You think Khan would fight a Dawson? Don't make me ****ing laugh.

Froch is a crude fighter yer but he's not that dirty at all. The Pascal and Taylor fights were not dirty. Dirrell was initiating it by holding Froch all night - Froch fought the fight according to the referee and did exactly the right thing.

I scored it even and so a Froch win with the perfectly justified point deduction.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Timothy Bradley by far.

[ma51f]

I don't like Froch's personality but he comes to fight, also he WANTS the big challenges and would take him in the heartbeat. If Khan and Froch were fighting on the same night in different networks, I rather watch Froch

ok i think i am going to have to educate you.

there are two types of boxers, those who are draws and nobodies.

draws like Hatton, Khan can fight anyone they like and make millions.

then there are nobodies like Bradley,Froch,Alexander who bring no money to the table. Due to this, they will try and fight everyone and anyone. then you'll get these nuthuggers who would call them warriors for fighting anyone when in fact its out necessity.

every boxer wants big challenges, its just those who are draws a have more to lose and will take less risky fights earlier in their career.

so there you have it, Khan isnt ducking no-one. just that because he is a superstar everyone wants to fight him simply because of the money. and Froch is just like every other boxer who is just looking for a payday against draws

[Equinox]

lol at khan stops both.

[ma51f]

Khan did not beat Barrera LMFAO. Did you see the size of that cut? 30 stitches or something absolutely pouring blood.... yet they conveniently wait until the 5th round before they stop it.

DISGUSTING

How is Pascal a nobody you absolute tard? He's done far more in his career than Khan. He actually went in a 12 round war for a belt, didn't get KTFO out in the first round by a journeyman. Moved up a divison, beat a champ and defended twice with a very, very hard fight coming up against the consensus number 1 in the division in Chad Dawson.

You think Khan would fight a Dawson? Don't make me ****ing laugh.

Froch is a crude fighter yer but he's not that dirty at all. The Pascal and Taylor fights were not dirty. Dirrell was initiating it by holding Froch all night - Froch fought the fight according to the referee and did exactly the right thing.

I scored it even and so a Froch win with the perfectly justified point deduction.

over 20,000 people paid to see the Khan/Barerra fight not to mention the hundreads of thousands PPV's. do you honestly think they would stop the fight just because of a cut? dont forget in that clash, Khan also got a cut right on te eye-lid, granted not as bad but still had an effect on him. they had to let the fight go no and see how it went. after 5 rounds when it was obvious Barerra had no chance, the doctor took mercy on him.

and yes Pascal was a nobody back then, only a few people hadactually heard of him. and yes he was weight-drainned which is why he ran out of steam, the score-cards were a joke, cant beleive how bias they were giving a 10 rnd victory to froch.

Khan's fighting Paulie, tried to fight JMM. just 23, his career has only started. judge him on his quality of opponants and the comparison to Froch when he's his age.

Froch is even dirtier then hopkins, holyfield. he picked Direll and threw him on the floor, rabbit punched him a couple dozen times, hugging him, tocuhing him up. he should go into wrestling or mma.

[S.G.]

At least they are willing to face genuine threats and give the fans the fights they want to see, unlike someone.

[#1Assassin]

ok i think i am going to have to educate you.

there are two types of boxers, those who are draws and nobodies.

draws like Hatton, Khan can fight anyone they like and make millions.

then there are nobodies like Bradley,Froch,Alexander who bring no money to the table. Due to this, they will try and fight everyone and anyone. then you'll get these nuthuggers who would call them warriors for fighting anyone when in fact its out necessity.

every boxer wants big challenges, its just those who are draws a have more to lose and will take less risky fights earlier in their career.

so there you have it, Khan isnt ducking no-one. just that because he is a superstar everyone wants to fight him simply because of the money. and Froch is just like every other boxer who is just looking for a payday against draws

but being a big draw and a good fighter isnt always connected to one another. yet u claim bradley is the one overrated.

money wise u are correct, but it hurts their legacy and their standing in the sport to take easy fights. khan is making all the right buisness moves, bradley is making all the right moves inside the ring. so who is overrated between the two when it comes down to ability? the man who proves himself in the ring or the one whos riding the high of a olympic medal and taking easy fights to avoid getting flattened (again). which he most certainly will once he steps up to the big boys in the division, the ones who fought their way to the top not posed their way to the top.

[-EX-]

Maidana easily...I don't even think he's that good...

[Pacdbest]

Look at this poll??? Bradley's winning the PR Battle. I just look at Bradley's resume. I dont see anything there that Proves he's That BIG. Holt, Campbell, and Witter in the resume is nothing to Brag about. Look where are those 3 now?? Holt just got KOED by a nobody, Witter's Quitter, and Campbell's a forgettable guy now.

Now look what Maidana Did to Golden Boy's Heir Apparent Victor Ortiz. I was so High on Ortiz before the fight and Maidana just took out Ortiz's heart. And recently, Look what Maidana did to a very Skilled Boxer with a Punch like Cayo. Maidana just Bulldoze this Undefeated guy.

I dont see Bradley can dicourage Maidana at all. Bradley got no KO Power. I dont think Bradley will survive the fury.

[ma51f]

At least they are willing to face genuine threats and give the fans the fights they want to see, unlike someone.

only because its out of necessity...

they bring no money so they HAVE to take the big fights to make ends meet

Khan has more to lose as he can make millions fighting anyone. Therefore as every other boxer who was in a similar position they generally take less riskier fights EARLY on in their career.

Hatton is a prime example. was a huge draw, made millions fighting no-one and then finally towards teh end of his career too kthe big fights. boxing and business