Why do haters continue to discredit Joe Calzaghe's career?
Collapse
-
Come on man, that was Tito coming out of retirement at a weight-class he didn't even belong in....
Joe Calzaghe had a good career. IMO he is a sure fire HOF'er. I rank him as the greatest SMW of all time. But, Roy was shot to hell by the time Joe beat him. I don't don't give Joe credit for that. I give Joe credit for Hopkins but not for Roy...Comment
-
I mean I understand Trinidad being retired for 2 years, and out of his weight class... but as you said, Roy was shot to **** when he fought Calzaghe... yet he fought Trinidad only 8 months prior...Come on man, that was Tito coming out of retirement at a weight-class he didn't even belong in....
Joe Calzaghe had a good career. IMO he is a sure fire HOF'er. I rank him as the greatest SMW of all time. But, Roy was shot to hell by the time Joe beat him. I don't don't give Joe credit for that. I give Joe credit for Hopkins but not for Roy...
Does a shot fighter get credit for beating another shot fighter?Comment
-
Interesting and I am going to have to say yes because I think 1 cheater gets credit for beating another cheater if both cheated in the same fight.
Just like how Funeka at 1st looked like some victim but used a banned substance to cut weight and Guzman just didn't bother make weight.
Guzman cheated more effectively so props to him for at least being a little smarter in his underhanded ways.Comment
-
Yeah, it's just like Trinidad was inactive for 2 years and out of his weight class... but at the same time Roy was supposed to be shot to ****.Interesting and I am going to have to say yes because I think 1 cheater gets credit for beating another cheater if both cheated in the same fight.
Just like how Funeka at 1st looked like some victim but used a banned substance to cut weight and Guzman just didn't bother make weight.
Guzman cheated more effectively so props to him for at least being a little smarter in his underhanded ways.
Not too mention 5 years older...Comment
-
He can get credit, but what I am saying is that Roy beating Tito does not prove that Roy was still a top fighter. What I was responding it was that he was making it seem like the Calzaghe win was good over Roy. Because, Roy was coming of a win over a HOF'er. Trying to make it seem like Roy had something left still. Which he didn't....Comment
-
The fight would have happened the same way just faster if they fought in 01 or 02.
It was a decent win for shot Roy, Tito did better than Lacy I think.Comment
-
Right, gotcha.He can get credit, but what I am saying is that Roy beating Tito does not prove that Roy was still a top fighter. What I was responding it was that he was making it seem like the Calzaghe win was good over Roy. Because, Roy was coming of a win over a HOF'er. Trying to make it seem like Roy had something left still. Which he didn't....
Yeah, I think even Lamplay and Kellerman said the same thing...
"This might be what it would have looked like to an extent, 7 or 8 years ago."Comment

Comment