Tweet
Just curious to hear considering both of them got so so wins and although Calzaghe got a bunch of HOFers on his resume, they were beyond done. So who do you think pathed his way more successfully to ensure zero loss? It's funny though because one was an offensive machine and the other defensive. Hmmmmm.
-
-
Calzaghe !! -
calzaghe.
even though his resume is softer than the french army , he did fight almost everyone at 168.Comment
-
Hahaah, I guess you can read that both ways. I don't mean protected it better in that he fought better opposition, I mean he protected in in avoiding dangers and steering himself in risk free paths.Comment
-
Calzaghe fought Kessler and Lacy thats it.
Jones and Hopkins wernt at their bestComment
-
Calzaghe. I don't why, he had to have been feeling empowered and **** being coked out, neva scared...Comment
-
Well in respect, many thought Kessler was crazy dangerous as well as Lacy. Although Calzaghe made Lacy look like what he was, nothing more than an over hyped Tyson body lookalike. I was shocked at how well he dominated Kessler. It was like watching a seasoned veteran or man beat the crap out of a boy who was in need of a lesson to be taught.Comment
-
Floyd's resume is only criticized because people expect so much from him. Calzaghe protected his 0 much more.Comment
-
JC. It's not even close IMO. 130-135 Floyd resume against the entire resume of Joe... I would still pick Floyd's resume to be greater.Comment
Comment