why does haye get credit, but wlad does not??

[Sparked_1985]

you call beating an old, shot man... a quality entertainment?

Wlad would have jabbed that old, shot man for 10 rounds, only starting to let right-hands go in round 10, to the soundtrack of polite indifferent applause from a German audience who are smiling impassively.

[Joeyzagz]

why does haye get credit for beating ruiz, but no one gave credit for Wlad knocking out a better fighter than ruiz, which is chambers, everybody gave haye credit, but wlad doesn't get ****..........

This is why....

Ruiz: 30 Kos 54% ko percentage
Chambers: 18 kos 48% ko ercentage

Ruiz: 6'2 231
Chambers 6'0 209 lbs


So Ruiz is bigger and more powerful than Chambers. And Haye had a better performance against Ruiz than Wlad had against Chambers.

[boxingking500]

This is why....

Ruiz: 30 Kos 54% ko percentage
Chambers: 18 kos 48% ko ercentage

Ruiz: 6'2 231
Chambers 6'0 209 lbs


So Ruiz is bigger and more powerful than Chambers. And Haye had a better performance against Ruiz than Wlad had against Chambers.

so since ruiz is bigger than chambers, hes better............


troll

at both there current states, eddie chambers would smoke ruiz,

[Earl-Hickey]

This is why....

Ruiz: 30 Kos 54% ko percentage
Chambers: 18 kos 48% ko ercentage

Ruiz: 6'2 231
Chambers 6'0 209 lbs


So Ruiz is bigger and more powerful than Chambers. And Haye had a better performance against Ruiz than Wlad had against Chambers.

so since ruiz is bigger than chambers, hes better............


troll

at both there current states, eddie chambers would smoke ruiz,

You haters need to make your mind up.

Either Haye is a chinny cruiserweight hype job, with overrated power, no chin or stamina, in which case his dominant win over a shopworn ruiz was impressive, alternitivley, Haye is the real deal in which he simply did what he should have done.

Which is it?

[The Hammer]

Haye has proved with wins over Ruiz, Valuev, Bonin and Barrett that he is ten times the fighter Wlad dreams of being.

You are obviously being sarcastic...

Defeating an age 38 slowed-down version of John Ruiz is not a big accomplishment.

Defeating top prime HWs like Chambers is much better.

[The Hammer]

This is why....

Ruiz: 30 Kos 54% ko percentage
Chambers: 18 kos 48% ko ercentage

Ruiz: 6'2 231
Chambers 6'0 209 lbs


So Ruiz is bigger and more powerful than Chambers. And Haye had a better performance against Ruiz than Wlad had against Chambers.

Age 27 Eddie Chambers has defeated two top ten heavyweights in the past year (Peter and Dimitrenko were both in the Ring top ten at the time).

Age 38 John Ruiz has not defeated even a top 25 HW since 2004.

Chambers is MUCH faster and has far better defensive skills.

[theghost#1]

why does haye get credit for beating ruiz, but no one gave credit for Wlad knocking out a better fighter than ruiz, which is chambers, everybody gave haye credit, but wlad doesn't get ****..........

Who cares, Wlad will beat Haye with ease, And people will still say "oh Haye is to small".

[$partacus]

Because Wlad fights scared, his own trainer is bored of Wlads BS style.

[BetterCallSaul]

eddie chambers would destroy ruiz...............................

No he wouldn't. He would probably slightly outpoint him in a boring decision win. Haye put a beating on Ruiz and hurt him with big punches.

[CiganoBoxer]

I dont know how anyone would rather watch a klitchko fight over watching an Haye fight ...gotta give it to haye...he goes for it from the opening bell...hes great to watch and the only HW worth watching IMO