(No hate thread) Do you consider mayweather one of the best Welterweights of this era

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jrosales13
    undisputed champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2008
    • 32632
    • 738
    • 763
    • 40,023

    #21
    Originally posted by No Ceilings
    So now you see why you're wrong then. The thread said best WW's of this era. Floyd is definetly one of them without a doubt.
    I didn't THIS era meant 4yrs. And, how was I wrong either way? I said skill wise he is resume he is not.

    Resume wise I would say as of right now. Pac has a better resume than Floyd. Now if Floyd beats Shane that would change.

    Comment

    • B.U.R.N.E.R
      ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2010
      • 30186
      • 1,344
      • 400
      • 47,475

      #22
      Originally posted by IMDAZED
      It says "This era." I'm gonna start from the year 2000...and I'm not sure he's top 10. Maybe. But def not top 5.
      Yeah I dont think hes top 5 either. But hes Top 10 IMO. Not bad for his 4th weight class.

      Comment

      • jrosales13
        undisputed champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2008
        • 32632
        • 738
        • 763
        • 40,023

        #23
        Originally posted by IMDAZED
        It says "This era." I'm gonna start from the year 2000...and I'm not sure he's top 10. Maybe. But def not top 5.
        Can you do a top 5 since 2000?

        Comment

        • 713832281
          Houston Texas
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2008
          • 1308
          • 87
          • 217
          • 7,712

          #24
          at 147 i do not consider PBF one of the best of this era. he has not done enough.

          Comment

          • jrosales13
            undisputed champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2008
            • 32632
            • 738
            • 763
            • 40,023

            #25
            Originally posted by No Ceilings
            Yeah I dont think hes top 5 either. But hes Top 10 IMO. Not bad for his 4th weight class.
            Then you must agree he is not the best WW of this era. Since we going from 2000 and he can't make the top 5 right?

            Comment

            • B.U.R.N.E.R
              ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2010
              • 30186
              • 1,344
              • 400
              • 47,475

              #26
              Tito, Forrest,Oscar, Quartey and Whitakher werent WW's when Floyd was. There is room for him in a Top 10 list.

              Comment

              • badnewsbrown
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Apr 2007
                • 2308
                • 70
                • 106
                • 10,233

                #27
                obviously one the most talented. but he never proved it against elite competition

                Comment

                • B.U.R.N.E.R
                  ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 30186
                  • 1,344
                  • 400
                  • 47,475

                  #28
                  Originally posted by jrosales13
                  Then you must agree he is not the best WW of this era. Since we going from 2000 and he can't make the top 5 right?
                  I never said he was the best WW. Floyd didnt hit WW until the middle of the decade.

                  I wouldnt consider guys like Tito, Nell, Oscar, Quartey and Forrest to be in his era for WW's. Floyds era is guys like Cotto, Marg, Judah, Baldi, Mosley, Pac etc...

                  Comment

                  • bojangles1987
                    bo jungle
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jul 2009
                    • 41118
                    • 1,326
                    • 357
                    • 63,028

                    #29
                    Originally posted by No Ceilings
                    Tito, Forrest,Oscar, Quartey and Whitakher werent WW's when Floyd was. There is room for him in a Top 10 list.
                    But wouldn't this era be the last 10-15 years? All those guys were welterweights in that time frame, and would all be ahead of Floyd.

                    Comment

                    • Hi-Dro
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 10362
                      • 670
                      • 640
                      • 14,224

                      #30
                      Originally posted by jrosales13
                      Then you must agree he is not the best WW of this era. Since we going from 2000 and he can't make the top 5 right?
                      Hell Nah he's not the best WW

                      the question is

                      is he ONE of the best?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP