prove to me dirrell got robbed against froch..

[Dirk Diggler UK]

every country does have bad decisions but nothing like uks history. it must suck being there but u got to see it.

Please inform us of the UK's history of bad decisions.

I'll wait.

[El 7 Mares V.2]

I'll be impartial since I really dislike both fighters, Dirrell held, ran, and ducked waaaay to much to deserve a win, on the other hand Froch who's style is the most horrendous and to me unwatchable style in boxing landed too little and had no effect on anything he landed on Dirrell to win the fight. He was pressuring but not effectively, I would of been happy with a draw but since I don't like either fighter I could of cared less who won really.

[SplitSecond]

anyone that thinks froch won that fight should follow another sport

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

It was 9-3 Dirrell.

[damned1974]

heres the full fight below...show me how froch even got near to losing this fight.

1) dirrlel did illegal ducking, showing the back of your head deliberately should have been a disq..

2) Dirrell held for 90 percent of the fight..the other 10 percent he fell over..

3)froch after 4 rounds bloodied dirrells face...and landed the best shot of the match, the left hook in the 8th..face..

4) why did dan rafael, jimmy iowa, allan green, graham houston, steven bunce, the ringside press, gary shaw(admitted dirrell didnt do enough), dirrells corner(you aint getting no decision here), the bigragu(youtubes biggest boxing pundit), ******** boxing forum, boxing snene all score it for froch...even if you replaced the ringside press with the judges froch won, are they on the pay roll as well...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATrAhwIclhw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3-qE...eature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_K3bT...eature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhU0K...eature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Phta5...eature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwAaf...eature=related

Are you forgetting the illegal tactics by Froch???? btw-the best punches of the fight came from Dirrell.They were also hurting Froch...

[Bennett]

Please inform us of the UK's history of bad decisions.

I'll wait.

mcclellan vs benn that fight should have been stopped in the first round now gman is blind and tarded good work guys

want more-------no mas?

hatton vs tszyu = fix. count the fouls.

[PittyPat]

It was 9-3 Dirrell.

Which rounds did you oh-so generously manage to give to Froch? :laff2:

[bojangles1987]

froch landed 3% of his punches
dirrell landed about 38%

/thread.

Along with the fact Dirrell outlanded Froch, that sums up how you are supposed to win a fight. Dirrell did screw himself over by fighting ugly, but still how can anyone say Froch WON the fight rather than Dirrell LOST the fight.

[PensionKiller]

mcclellan vs benn that fight should have been stopped in the first round now gman is blind and tarded good work guys

want more-------no mas?

hatton vs tszyu = fix. count the fouls.

Floyd VS Judah was fixed.

Soon as Uncle roger stepped in and attacked Judah, should have been a NC or some ****

You do know that if someone drops out the ring, you give extra time to get in

Rules of Boxing
From Boxrec Boxing Encyclopaedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The rules of boxing vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and on whether it is an amateur or professional bout. A violation of the following rules is considered a foul, and can result in a point deduction or disqualification:

* You cannot hit below the belt, hold, trip, kick, headbutt, wrestle, bite, spit on, or push your opponent.
* You cannot hit with your head, shoulder, forearm, or elbow.
* You cannot hit with an open glove, the inside of the glove, the wrist, the backhand, or the side of the hand.
* You cannot punch your opponent's back, or the back of his head or neck (rabbit punch), or on the kidneys (kidney punch).
* You cannot throw a punch while holding on to the ropes to gain leverage.
* You can't hold your opponent and hit him at the same time, or duck so low that your head is below your opponent's belt line.
* When the referee breaks you from a clinch, you have to take a full step back; you cannot immediately hit your opponent--that's called "hitting on the break" and is illegal.
* You cannot spit out your mouthpiece on purpose to get a rest.
* If you score a knockdown of your opponent, you must go to the farthest neutral corner while the referee makes the count.
* If you "floor" your opponent, you cannot hit him when he's on the canvas.
* A floored boxer has up to ten seconds to get back up on his feet before losing the bout by knockout.
* A boxer who is knocked down cannot be saved by the bell in any round, depending upon the local jurisdiction's rules.
* A boxer who is hit with an accidental low blow has up to five minutes to recover. If s/he cannot continue after five minutes, s/he is considered knocked out.
* If the foul results in an injury that causes the fight to end immediately, the boxer who committed the foul is disqualified.
* If the foul causes an injury but the bout continues, the referee orders the judges to deduct two points from the boxer who caused the injury.
* If an unintentional foul causes the bout to be stopped immediately, the bout is ruled a "no contest" if four rounds have not been fully completed. (If the bout was scheduled for four rounds, then three rounds must have been completed.) If four rounds have been completed, the judges' scorecards are tallied and the fighter who is ahead on points is awarded a technical decision. If the scores are even, it will be called a "technical draw."
* If a boxer is knocked out of the ring, he gets a count of 20 to get back in and on his feet. He cannot be assisted.
* In some jurisdictions the standing eight-count or the three knockdown rule also may be in effect.
* In other jurisdictions, only the referee can stop the bout.

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Rules_of_Boxing

Tyson VS Holyfield was a fix. Holyfield headbutted Tyson and got him pissed so he bit his ear

[bojangles1987]

Too bad boxing doesn't work this way, there are no special rules for title fights. Every boxing fight, title or not, the winner is declared by whoever wins the most rounds, PERIOD. This notion that "he didn't do enough to take the title" is absolutely moronic (unless the fight actually ended in a draw (6 rounds to 6 rounds)). Either froch won more rounds or he didn't and there is no way in hell froch won 6-7 rounds.



^^^JOKE^^^

I've never seen the scorecards before. WOW. That just makes my opinion Froch got the hometown decision obvious.