prove to me dirrell got robbed against froch..

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Anyone who has 20/20 vision could see the more effective fighter was Dirrell. I could have never watched a boxing match in my life and would have seen that. If I upset you ignore me, otherwise **** off.

Judges are supposedly trained pro's, and they **** up all the time. I don't give a **** who you are. It doesn't mean you are better at scoring a fight.

So you maintain that you have more expertise than boxing writers, experts, fighters etc?

[slimshandy69]

So you maintain that you have more expertise than boxing writers, experts, fighters etc?

mate your schooling him, let him seeth away...yoube raised good points and hes just hurled personal abuse at you, evidnece that he knows dirrell ****ed up his title shot...

[ragingvic]

you dont go to the champs hometown, literally run at times, hold to the point of having a point deducted, and expect to get a decision in a close fight where you arguably may have won/lost by a point.

[slimshandy69]

you dont go to the champs hometown, literally run at times, hold to the point of having a point deducted, and expect to get a decision in a close fight where you arguably may have won/lost by a point.

exactly...

[ИATAS]

In general Dirrell should have won BUT I am a huge proponent of the "you have to take the title from the Champion" rule that alot of people now-a-days seem to think is "old school" and irrelevant.

Had it been a non title fight then no doubt Dirrell should have won but in a title fight no fooking way can you win by the odd potshot, ruiz'ing, and marathon running.

btw Manny Steward said Froch won too, i assume because he holds a similar perspective on the title challenger rule.

Too bad boxing doesn't work this way, there are no special rules for title fights. Every boxing fight, title or not, the winner is declared by whoever wins the most rounds, PERIOD. This notion that "he didn't do enough to take the title" is absolutely moronic (unless the fight actually ended in a draw (6 rounds to 6 rounds)). Either froch won more rounds or he didn't and there is no way in hell froch won 6-7 rounds.



^^^JOKE^^^

[bolopunchez]

This thread is just another reason why I don't like Froch.

He clearly lost the fight and anyone who isn't blinded by favoritism and actually knows how to judge a fight would know that Dirrell made Froch look like an amateur.

[PensionKiller]

heres the full fight below...show me how froch even got near to losing this fight.

1) dirrlel did illegal ducking, showing the back of your head deliberately should have been a disq..

2) Dirrell held for 90 percent of the fight..the other 10 percent he fell over..

3)froch after 4 rounds bloodied dirrells face...and landed the best shot of the match, the left hook in the 8th..face..

4) why did dan rafael, jimmy iowa, allan green, graham houston, steven bunce, the ringside press, gary shaw(admitted dirrell didnt do enough), dirrells corner(you aint getting no decision here), the bigragu(youtubes biggest boxing pundit), ******** boxing forum, boxing snene all score it for froch...even if you replaced the ringside press with the judges froch won, are they on the pay roll as well...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATrAhwIclhw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3-qEH90blc&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_K3bTx--7Hs&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhU0KMK196A&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Phta5fkCDTw&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwAaf...eature=related

They actually said win this round, you are the world champion.

I gave rounds to Dirrell on actually getting hits.

I gave 1,2 to direll 3,4 froch 5,6 dirrell, 7 a draw, 8 froch, 9 dirrell, 10 a draw (9-9), 11 dirrell, 12 a draw for me.

116-113 Dirrell.

Both were dirty, ugly fight to score and watch, and dirrell has some high pitched voice, aswell as forch being slow and missing and hitting the back of the ehad, but yeah it was ok.

That's as fair as I can be. You could argue the last for direll aswell.

[PittyPat]

119-108 Dirrell, and that's been my score on each subsequent viewing - and I'm talking HD video, slowing down each and every punch, splitting up rounds into minute-long segments, and observing who's controlling the pace.

At no point did Froch look like he was the ring general, nor was he outlanding Dirrell in punches. Fuck compubox - just look at the damn punches with your own eyes! Dirrell was landing clean, and at will.

[MidnightSpecial]

119-108 Dirrell, and that's been my score on each subsequent viewing - and I'm talking HD video, slowing down each and every punch, splitting up rounds into minute-long segments, and observing who's controlling the pace.

At no point did Froch look like he was the ring general, nor was he outlanding Dirrell in punches. Fuck compubox - just look at the damn punches with your own eyes! Dirrell was landing clean, and at will.

Not to mention Froch got knocked loopy twice by Dirrell

[Pirao]

I think it was a close fight that could have gone either way, the 1st time I watched it I think I scored it a draw, and I'm not going to watch that **** fight again to rescore it.