prove to me dirrell got robbed against froch..

[Dirk Diggler UK]

anybody who understands boxing saw dirrell beat froch

people saying otherwise are just biased nuthuggers who dont know how to score a fight

it was a hometown decision,that is obvious

Biased? You're still butthurt because Froch slagged off Calzaghe.

[ИATAS]

Calzaghe had a busted nose but Hopkins didnt have a scratch on him....lol

[BoxingFanFirst]

Why are you telling people to tell you how Dirrell was robbed, when you clearly have no intention of listening to there opinions, and facts. **** off idiot.

Anyone with half a brain, and isn't in love with Froch saw that Dirrell won. My dad and I both went into the fight hoping Froch would win, and came out thinking Dirrell was robbed.

[slimshandy69]

Dirrell once got a bloody nose after a strong gust of wind came in his direction. He's a bleeder.

And last time I checked a winner is declared after adding up the amount of rounds won, not by who's face is in better condition, if that were the case Pacquiao would have lost to Clottey.

I cannot take anyone seriously on this website that can honestly say they felt Froch won MORE rounds than Dirrell, period.

You can say dirrell fought ******, he fought sloppy, he was a *****, you name it, that's fine by me, but as soon as you say Froch won MORE rounds than dirrell, I know for a fact you're either an idiot or biased as hell.

so why are you her then??boxing scne and ea5tside boxing both scored it to froch, so your ****ed for boxing forums to post on, and "take seriously"

[Shattered Jaw]

All we need now is use of the word 'seething'....

[Mighty_Windir]

I've seen robberies but that was just ****in disgusting.

Dirrel made Froch look like a n00b.

[The Gambler1981]

You can say dirrell fought ******, he fought sloppy, he was a *****, you name it, that's fine by me, but as soon as you say Froch won MORE rounds than dirrell, I know for a fact you're either an idiot or biased as hell.

This right here is pretty much how I feel. Normally I am pretty open to scoring fights as it is not an exact science but I can see no way Froch won more rounds.

Not liking the way a fighter fights is not reall iportant in scoring a fight. it is a matter of who is more effective if someone can not overlook styles they should not be scoring fights.

[check hook]

Carl Froch deserved to win.

I scored it 114-113 for Froch, the same as Dan Rafael.

Dirrell's childish behaviour - falling down deliberately, holding, running, sticking out his tongue - was DISGRACEFUL.

disgraceful ring behavious does not equate to a loss.....he may have stank the place out and did everything you just mentioned...but he still won....what does that say about Froch???

Froch has class A heart, chin and conditioning......but C class skills.

[slimshandy69]

Why are you telling people to tell you how Dirrell was robbed, when you clearly have no intention of listening to there opinions, and facts. **** off idiot.

Anyone with half a brain, and isn't in love with Froch saw that Dirrell won. My dad and I both went into the fight hoping Froch would win, and came out thinking Dirrell was robbed.

as i sy why did boxing scene and ea5tside boxing score it to froch, why did dan rafael score it to froch??jimmy iowa score it to froch, graham houston top boxing writer score it to froch, steven bunche score it to froch, the ring side press score it to froch, allan green scored it to froch, even gary shaw said "it was no robbery"...

This yank here scores it to froch...why, answer me that...do all these top boxing fighters/experts have half a brain???

does this guy have half a brain???cos he gets more views than any other youtube boxing pundit and he scored it to froch...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxWNh7QjoKo

not one person has offered any evidence of why dirrell got "robbed", you lot are just ugly seething yanks...

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Why are you telling people to tell you how Dirrell was robbed, when you clearly have no intention of listening to there opinions, and facts. **** off idiot.

Anyone with half a brain, and isn't in love with Froch saw that Dirrell won. My dad and I both went into the fight hoping Froch would win, and came out thinking Dirrell was robbed.

This is what is annoying. Fannies like you posting on a boxing forum thinking your opinion....yes opinion....is better than everyone elses. I scored the fight for Dirrell by a point when I re-watched it. However, there are respected boxing writers who scored it for Froch. Yet according to you, they are in love with Froch? Your opinion is more worthy? Please enlighten us as to your background in the sport?