Comments Thread For: Pacquiao-Valero is what I want, Not Margarito: Says Roach

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mr. Philadel
    #215Boxing
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 20893
    • 1,071
    • 1,413
    • 35,332

    #51
    Originally posted by BadBrains
    Valero? Comeon now man that guy's still a youtube hype job. Timmy's the man!
    Tim can BOX and don't move on str8 lines......you follow me?!?

    Comment

    • pnksntdead
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Oct 2004
      • 677
      • 38
      • 3
      • 14,830

      #52
      Originally posted by Black Magic
      Whatever happened to fighting the best fighters out there and not chasing the biggest paydays?
      Dunno, why don't you ask floyd that question? Don't bring up him taking on mosley, he got cornered like a rat into fighting him.

      you guys give pac flak for mentioning valero, how about friggin matthew hatton or saul alvarez for floyd, you know he would'vetaken those if he weren't ridiculed.

      If pac ends up fighting valero, thats a tune up for him, just like clottey was. Floyd, let's see if he stops making excuses.

      Comment

      • jrosales13
        undisputed champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2008
        • 32632
        • 738
        • 763
        • 40,023

        #53
        Originally posted by letsgobrady
        you know bradley and alexander are undefeated to
        True but what makes Valero more intruiguing is his 100% KO ratio. And, the fact that a lot of people see similarites between Valero and the old Pac.

        Does that make it right? No, does Bradley deserve it more than Valero? of course he does. Does Bradley have a better chance in beating Pac than Valero? Of course he does. But, Valero might be more intruiguing due to his style and record.

        The Alexander argument? Eh... I think he is just getting a lot of hype now. I understand Bradley. Alexander not so much. I probably would prefere Valero over Alexander. I think Valero brings more of a threat than Alexander. And, I agree I think Bradley is more of a threat than Valero

        The only reason I would want to see the Alexander fight even though I think it would be an easy fight for Pac. Is to get the whole Pac has never fought an African American fight bull**** out of the way.

        Comment

        • jrosales13
          undisputed champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2008
          • 32632
          • 738
          • 763
          • 40,023

          #54
          And, if they go the JMM route. Which I stated yesterday they might do. It better be at 135. Or no damn fight.

          Comment

          • FeFist
            No.1
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 9252
            • 576
            • 357
            • 29,695

            #55
            Pacquiao would beat the breaks off Valero. It'd be an interesting fight as both fighters are very open and active, Pacquiao is just superior in everyway to Valero. It's similar to the Mayweather v Marquez fight.

            I don't exactly think this fight would prove everything though it gives Valero an opportunity to prove himself. I'd also rather see this fight than see Pacquiao fight that cheating scumbag.

            Comment

            • letsgobrady
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jan 2008
              • 6274
              • 126
              • 11
              • 12,670

              #56
              Originally posted by jrosales13
              True but what makes Valero more intruiguing is his 100% KO ratio. And, the fact that a lot of people see similarites between Valero and the old Pac.

              Does that make it right? No, does Bradley deserve it more than Valero? of course he does. Does Bradley have a better chance in beating Pac than Valero? Of course he does. But, Valero might be more intruiguing due to his style and record.

              The Alexander argument? Eh... I think he is just getting a lot of hype now. I understand Bradley. Alexander not so much. I probably would prefere Valero over Alexander. I think Valero brings more of a threat than Alexander. And, I agree I think Bradley is more of a threat than Valero

              The only reason I would want to see the Alexander fight even though I think it would be an easy fight for Pac. Is to get the whole Pac has never fought an African American fight bull**** out of the way.
              this is true.valero has fought no one alexander made witter quit and knocked out urango.if alexander is hype than what does that make valero?

              Comment

              • counterpunch
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Nov 2009
                • 194
                • 0
                • 0
                • 6,247

                #57
                Like I mentioned, running out of flatfooted in ww division the remaining contenders are far dangerous from the last 2 fights of Pac. The unstoppable typoon is changing course again! Anyways, Devon Alexander seems acceptable at at light ww lbs....... Pac is exciting to watch and he's really explosive right now! but I think fans love to see him fight someone with different stlyle, one that not just block punches but knows how to avoid punches and can move side to side as well like what he's doing right now.....at least that's fair. The last 2 actually are predictable punching bags susceptible to his style.

                Comment

                • THE_BIG_HURT
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 1372
                  • 23
                  • 22
                  • 8,543

                  #58
                  I say if Mayweather doesnt take the fight or loses to Mosley in may thus forcing a Re-match.
                  I say Let Pacquiao fight Valero (Very exciting and Intriguing stylistically) and then have Alexander fight Bradley (also very exciting and Intriguing stylistically).
                  Then let the 2 winners fight (Pac and Bradly imo) in what is sure to be a big fight that EVERYBODY could get behind.
                  That would be pretty awesome for boxing, in my opinion.

                  Comment

                  • War Dinamita
                    Canelo Mafia
                    • May 2009
                    • 6188
                    • 342
                    • 129
                    • 14,690

                    #59
                    When is Roach going to stop cherry picking? Valero hasn't done **** to deserve a fight against the #1 p4p fighter in the world. Roach should be focus on Mayweather.

                    Comment

                    • BoxingFanFirst
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 2191
                      • 94
                      • 7
                      • 2,562

                      #60
                      Originally posted by pnksntdead
                      Dunno, why don't you ask floyd that question? Don't bring up him taking on mosley, he got cornered like a rat into fighting him.

                      you guys give pac flak for mentioning valero, how about friggin matthew hatton or saul alvarez for floyd, you know he would'vetaken those if he weren't ridiculed.

                      If pac ends up fighting valero, thats a tune up for him, just like clottey was. Floyd, let's see if he stops making excuses.
                      The difference is Floyds trainer or Manager didn't mention those as possible fights.... DLH and goldenboy mentioned it once, but everyone knows that was a ploy to sign him and add attention to him. The only ones who ever said that was the pinoy examiner and **** like that..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP