Why Does Manny Get a Pass for Cherry Picking Opponents?

[ManniePhresh]

Green K bro? really you care so much about that? I just gave you some green to make you happy bro.

Burner who is a notortious Floyd fan and criticize Pac damn near every day. Is on green, Check hook is on green, Ray is on green k, Kevin Jesus, Dorian all in green I think either is in green too. there are more Floyd fans who are in green because they don't do the childish insults back and forth.

Also Pac fans like Majic Jordan and etc have been here forever when there was unlimited karma. So of course you going to see them having high rep power.

And, again yes the Pac fans here outnumber Floyd fans but bro that is damn near in every website. Honestly go start checking out other websites and you will that the mojority will have more Pac fans on it. Maybe the reason is cuz Pac just might have the bigger fan base aroudn the world.

theres a difference between more fans and louder fans

[pasawayako]

if this haters think that morales and barrera are shot at the age of 29, then i don't know how/what to call mosley who is a 39 years old. LOL.

[jrosales13]

theres a difference between more fans and louder fans

So wait who has the more fans and who has the louder fans?

[check hook]

if this haters think that morales and barrera are shot at the age of 29, then i don't know how/what to call mosley who is a 39 years old. LOL.

boxing age is relative.........age does not make one shot...........being in wars and getting KO'd is what makes fighters shot.........

[Khalid X]

So nobody who question Pac's resume has made any valid points yet?

absolutely not. I just kept reading random stuff that is easily

Nobody has yet to dispute the fact that Roach himself flat out said that Cotto, DLH, and Hatton, were shot and or past their prime.

I just did. I asked who was better than Cotto at 147 and who was better at 140 than Hatton when Pac faced them. THe answer was no one. Floyd had just returned, Marg was out of boxing, and Cotto beat Shane. It's debatable, but IMO, given the cheating scandle.. If Cotto wasn't the best at WW he was easily top 3. Ricky Hatton being the top guy at 140 is not even debatable. Also this is about cherry picking. DLH is the one who called out Pac not vice versa...so to say Pac cherry picked Oscar is not fair.

Nobody has yet to dispute the fact that Roach wouldn't let Manny fight Mosely because according to Roach, he's "too good".

Cotto beat Shane. Cotto is a Top Rank fighter and Arum wanted to keep Cotto. It made no sense to make a Mosley fight at that time...but don't you worry, pac will fight Shane soon enough (granted Shane takes care of business)

No one can justify why he ducked Raheem.

We flat out told you why he didn't fight Raheem. He had agreed to fight Morales immediantly after his fight with EM and prior to Morales losing to Raheem. Also he wasn't in the same weight class.

Basically what I'm seeing from you is that you are asking questions and not getting the answers you want.

[ManniePhresh]

[QUOTE=jrosales13;7807349]So wait who has the more fans and who has the louder fans?[/QUO

pacquioa has the biggest cult and loudest cult currently.

[Idgas]

Honestly, I'm curious. Around these boards other boxers are constantly bashed about cherry picking, but no one, Pac fan or otherwise can claim Team Pac has done any different from these fighters they claimed have taken the easy road?

For example, Pac hardly gets any criticism for not fighting Mosely when his camp openly ducked him. I don't get it?

Same for Raheem. Raheem dominates Erik Morales for 11 out of 12 rounds, and instead of fighting Raheem, Manny fights a shot Morales.

You want to talk about cherry picking?

By Roach's own admission DLH was a dead man walking whom no longer desired to fight when he was matched up against Manny. He was literally drained and dehydrated, and this came straight from the mouth of Pacs camp.

Cotto? Again by team Pacs admission, Cotto was damaged goods who'd had his career ruined by Margarito. Did that stop them from fighting and hyping the fight? Nope.

Hatton? Again, by Team Pacs own admission, he'd been ruined by Mayweather, and was coming off a fight where he'd been brutalized by Lazcano. They still fought him.

Clottey? I'll give Manny credit for the fight, but everyone in boxing knew what was coming. Everyone expected Clottey to shell up and take hits, he was taylor made for Pacs style.

Whoever cares to post the video evidence, please do.

you say it like his opponents had zero chances of winning. if you read past threads, you will see that half the board predicted pac to lose. there's no point criticizing pac for cherry picking fights that present reasonable chances of defeat.

[ManniePhresh]

absolutely not. I just kept reading random stuff that is easily



I just did. I asked who was better than Cotto at 147 and who was better at 140 than Hatton when Pac faced them. THe answer was no one. Floyd had just returned, Marg was out of boxing, and Cotto beat Shane. It's debatable, but IMO, given the cheating scandle.. If Cotto wasn't the best at WW he was easily top 3. Ricky Hatton being the top guy at 140 is not even debatable. Also this is about cherry picking. DLH is the one who called out Pac not vice versa...so to say Pac cherry picked Oscar is not fair.



Cotto beat Shane. Cotto is a Top Rank fighter and Arum wanted to keep Cotto. It made no sense to make a Mosley fight at that time...but don't you worry, pac will fight Shane soon enough (granted Shane takes care of business)



We flat out told you why he didn't fight Raheem. He had agreed to fight Morales immediantly after his fight with EM and prior to Morales losing to Raheem. Also he wasn't in the same weight class.

Basically what I'm seeing from you is that you are asking questions and not getting the answers you want.

ok this will tell me how dellusional you are j do agree with this guys post...

[check hook]

Because, somebody like Emil will be in the green karma thread. Where everybody give each other green k in that thread.

So this whole Pac fans run this site is cuz of green K?

How about this one jro.....the moderators deleted a comment on mine in another thrad.........what do you think about that???????

[fabie]

Honestly, I'm curious. Around these boards other boxers are constantly bashed about cherry picking, but no one, Pac fan or otherwise can claim Team Pac has done any different from these fighters they claimed have taken the easy road?

For example, Pac hardly gets any criticism for not fighting Mosely when his camp openly ducked him. I don't get it?

Same for Raheem. Raheem dominates Erik Morales for 11 out of 12 rounds, and instead of fighting Raheem, Manny fights a shot Morales.

You want to talk about cherry picking?

By Roach's own admission DLH was a dead man walking whom no longer desired to fight when he was matched up against Manny. He was literally drained and dehydrated, and this came straight from the mouth of Pacs camp.

Cotto? Again by team Pacs admission, Cotto was damaged goods who'd had his career ruined by Margarito. Did that stop them from fighting and hyping the fight? Nope.

Hatton? Again, by Team Pacs own admission, he'd been ruined by Mayweather, and was coming off a fight where he'd been brutalized by Lazcano. They still fought him.

Clottey? I'll give Manny credit for the fight, but everyone in boxing knew what was coming. Everyone expected Clottey to shell up and take hits, he was taylor made for Pacs style.

Whoever cares to post the video evidence, please do.

I think you are taking ROACH's words literally whenever he tries to explain to the media how his boxer (PACQUIAO) would fare with the said boxers. Doesn't mean they were shot or anything in that nature, he meant that FIGURATIVELY, PACQUIAO would annihilate these boxers and therefore using a language that describes a visual analogy of opponents being those...