Can Wladimir Klitschko break Joe Louis's 25 title defense record?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
It's highly unlikely at 23. Just plain unlikely on the other (if for no other reason he might want to retire and count chips). He has a shot at the general (i.e. not lineal title) record for wins in Heavyweight title fights period if one includes the soft first WBO reign (soft because Lennox was generally accepted as THE champ). He needs ten more wins to past Louis's 25.
No matter the final tally, it's impressive. Hello Canastota.Last edited by crold1; 07-04-2011, 07:00 PM.Comment
-
Yes he could. Considering there are no more BIG Event fights on the horizon, where it needs buildup. He could go on a Bum-of-the-month type tour, since we're comparing him to Joe Louis.
Not necessarily that they're bums but you get the point. Speed up his activity, less buildup and keep racking up victories. Here is the hypothetical schedule:
Dust off the Chisora-Fury winner in September, October, or Novmember.
Fight the 6'6 tall Norodic Nightmare in Feb or March.
Give Eddie Chambers a rematch two months later.
Ko Alexander Povetkin 4 months after that.
Fight 50 year old Evander Holyfield with a contract stipulation that states, HE HAS TO GO INTO MANDATORY RETIREMENT if he losses, no comebacks on any continent of this planet. If he can build a spaceship and have a intergalactic fight on Jupiter, then Ok.
Have another annual Undisputed Cruiserweight move up and dust him off.
And there you go. No lengthy breaks in between, force these guys into short-notice, agree to all my terms fights. Don't let them dance around like Povetkin did, trying to bide time. Take it or leave it and stay busy and he shall break the record for Title Defenses.Comment
-
How does it matter?
Many of Louis' 25 defenses were against guys who had no business fighting for the Heavyweight Title. In this day and age most of the fights would not have even been sanctioned.
The record has nothing to do with quality of opposition and any Heavyweight who defends his title 25 times if obviously going to end up running into a fair amount of fighters who have little or no business sharing the ring with him.
I would feel safe in wagering that in the next 50 years we will not see another Heavyweight Champion defend his belt as many times as Wlad will have done by the time he retires. That alone should help to put his legacy into perspective for those who look back a few decades from now without the same bias that many posters here hold against Klitschko.Comment
-
-
I would feel safe in wagering that in the next 50 years we will not see another Heavyweight Champion defend his belt as many times as Wlad will have done by the time he retires. That alone should help to put his legacy into perspective for those who look back a few decades from now without the same bias that many posters here hold against Klitschko.
In fact HAD WLAD FOUGHT opponents like Frazier (blind on left eye) or Cleveland Williams (atrophied leg after a gun shooting) it would be the final proof how the division sucks.
And of Louis' 27 title fights
* 9 were 190+ lbs
* 7 were 180+ lbs
* 1 was 170+ lbs
of the remaining 10
* 4 came off a loss
of the remaining 6
* 2 were against bums (Farr, Roper)
The remaining 4 were
* Galento (a former cruiser)
* Nova (a former cruiser)
* Buddy Baer
That's Joe Louis' world title record in a nutshell.
In terms of real heavyweight Wladimir Klitschko's record is so much better than Louis'. It's an insult to compare Louis to Klitschko.
And the ONLY reason why people dare to compare these two is because of the misnomer "heavyweight".
Take a look at this pic and you know how Joe Louis' record would have been evaporated the minute he stepped into a ring with a modern heavyweight:
This is what they called a heavyweight fight back then (Louis standing on some box here BTW):
Louis would be demolished by B-level cruisers these days.
Add to it that these guys fought mainly American opposition (since Soviet Bloc'ers were FORBIDDEN to box) the record of Louis, Ali (and even Lennox) is far less worth than Klitschko's.
Ali's belts are approximately as much worth as the EBU belts nowadays. Louis' belts probably even less.
It's pretty safe to assume that in the next decades there won't be any champ like Wlad, since he already surpassed the greats of the last century.Last edited by hweightblogger; 07-04-2011, 09:58 PM.Comment
-
Only if one includes sub-200 opposition (which Wlad isn't allowed to box)
or bums (like some of Ali's or Holmes or Louis' opponents) then these guys have a slight edge.
In fact HAD WLAD FOUGHT opponents like Frazier (blind on left eye) or Cleveland Williams (atrophied leg after a gun shooting) it would be the final proof how the division sucks.
And of Louis' 27 title fights
* 9 were 190+ lbs
* 7 were 180+ lbs
* 1 was 170+ lbs
of the remaining 10
* 4 came off a loss
of the remaining 6
* 2 were against bums (Farr, Roper)
The remaining 4 were
* Galento (a former cruiser)
* Nova (a former cruiser)
* Buddy Baer
That's Joe Louis' world title record in a nutshell.
In terms of real heavyweight Wladimir Klitschko's record is so much better than Louis'. It's an insult to compare Louis to Klitschko.
And the ONLY reason why people dare to compare these two is because of the misnomer "heavyweight".
Glass jaw Wlad wouldn't last a round with Joe Louis, and Vitali would just quit LOL.
Add to it that these guys fought mainly American opposition (since Soviet Bloc'ers were FORBIDDEN to box) the record of Louis, Ali (and even Lennox) is far less worth than Klitschko's.
Ali's belts are approximately as much worth as the EBU belts nowadays. Louis' belts probably even less.Comment
Comment