Boxing is all about styles, but aint no style is gonna beat PAC !!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hannibal Barca
    Hand of the Gods
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 2538
    • 152
    • 0
    • 8,893

    #131
    Originally posted by soyotoyapex
    *****s living in the distant past again
    2008 is the distant past?

    Comment

    • Shadows
      All-Time Great
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jul 2009
      • 8293
      • 192
      • 250
      • 15,434

      #132
      Originally posted by Chups
      And every race.
      Never said he didn't.

      Comment

      • Hannibal Barca
        Hand of the Gods
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2009
        • 2538
        • 152
        • 0
        • 8,893

        #133
        Originally posted by Pullcounter
        bernard hopkins?
        You don't know **** about boxing.

        1. Benard Hopkins has 5 losses and 2 draws, prestige wise isn't considered to be nearly as good as Manny, and didn't suddenly become great in the latter on his career. Consistently, since his debut, he's been an all around good fighter.

        2. Hopkins only had two early career losses. He lost his debut fight in 88, and he lost by UD to RJJ in 93. He didn't lose again until his 2005 match against Jermain Taylor, when he was much older.

        Next..

        Comment

        • Chups
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • May 2004
          • 18400
          • 1,835
          • 1,281
          • 52,879

          #134
          Originally posted by Nike Phats
          You don't know **** about boxing.

          1. Benard Hopkins has 5 losses and 2 draws, prestige wise isn't considered to be nearly as good as Manny, and didn't suddenly become great in the latter on his career. Consistently, since his debut, he's been an all around good fighter.

          2. Hopkins only had two early career losses. He lost his debut fight in 88, and he lost by UD to RJJ in 93. He didn't lose again until his 2005 match against Jermain Taylor, when he was much older.

          Next..

          Fail!



          Bernard Hopkins did more accomplishments from 31-45 than 0-30.

          At 31+ his resume includes Glen Johnson, Trinidad, DLH, Wright, Tarver and Pavlik.

          Comment

          • V.WEBB
            CBVM
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 14327
            • 621
            • 174
            • 21,453

            #135
            Originally posted by soyotoyapex
            *****s living in the distant past again
            Sad that is the only response you all can come up with. Cotto-Rulez is a Cotto fan....

            Comment

            • Hannibal Barca
              Hand of the Gods
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2009
              • 2538
              • 152
              • 0
              • 8,893

              #136
              Originally posted by Chups

              Fail!



              Bernard Hopkins did more accomplishments from 31-45 than 0-30.

              At 31+ his resume includes Glen Johnson, Trinidad, DLH, Wright, Tarver and Pavlik.
              How exactly does that conflict with anything I said?

              BTW, 3 of BHops last 7 fights have been losses. He's clearly declined.

              Comment

              • Pullcounter
                no guts no glory
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2004
                • 42582
                • 549
                • 191
                • 49,739

                #137
                Originally posted by Nike Phats
                You don't know **** about boxing.

                1. Benard Hopkins has 5 losses and 2 draws, prestige wise isn't considered to be nearly as good as Manny, and didn't suddenly become great in the latter on his career. Consistently, since his debut, he's been an all around good fighter.

                2. Hopkins only had two early career losses. He lost his debut fight in 88, and he lost by UD to RJJ in 93. He didn't lose again until his 2005 match against Jermain Taylor, when he was much older.

                Next..
                he wasn't so great in the early part of his career... then he turns 31 and all of a sudden he's a master?

                su****ious....

                Comment

                • boxer2k5
                  im a sociable person
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Oct 2004
                  • 4529
                  • 173
                  • 6
                  • 11,192

                  #138
                  Originally posted by d0n
                  The old Pac.
                  pre ped pac

                  Comment

                  • fabie
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2009
                    • 1498
                    • 246
                    • 180
                    • 10,255

                    #139
                    Originally posted by Nike Phats
                    Because it goes against the fundamental laws of biology, as well as the illustrious history of not only boxing, but professional sports as a whole. People don't suddenly burst onto the scene and become extraordinary athletes at 30 years old. The tends to be when athletes decline, especially in sports dependent upon the physicality of the athletes.

                    Hence the su****ions of PED use.
                    Your su****ion doesn't necessarily equate to what is happening.

                    Lance Armstrong is not supposed to win 7 Tour De France either....or Michael Jordan is not supposed to win multiple championships after he "retired" from bball either to comeback....or Muhammad Ali is not supposed to win 3 world Titles after coming back...or Kobe Bryant is not supposed to win the championships without Shaq...and on and on.

                    That's why there's a competition. Doesn't mean that if a person is phenomenal in his genre meant he should be punished just because he is that good.

                    It is ok to be su****ious of Pacquiao but to further negate what he has done without due process of law and testing, then there's no proofs that he is on PEDs.

                    He has never been "flagged" by the NSAC and has never violated any law. It is Mayweather's demands and Pacquiao refusing it automatically invalidates what he has done?

                    BS.

                    These people I've mentioned are above average athletes and sportsmen not relegated to being "average"...we cannot compare them with their counterparts because they are that good.

                    Allowing the triumphant spirit to rise is the main thing about competition. Until Pacquiao has been proven to be on drugs and a cheater, I would refrain from it. Me thinks that you already hold a grudge against him.

                    I could be wrong too but I still don't want to judge you either.

                    Comment

                    • soyotoyapex
                      Banned
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 248
                      • 31
                      • 0
                      • 308

                      #140
                      Originally posted by COACH-WEBB
                      Sad that is the only response you all can come up with. Cotto-Rulez is a Cotto fan....
                      yeah, like burner is areal pwill fan

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP