Boxing is all about styles, but aint no style is gonna beat PAC !!

[soyotoyapex]

True story.

[Lakas]

Pacquiao is a great fighter i have to agree

[$partacus]

A great counter puncher can beat Pac the JMM fights showed this.

[soyotoyapex]

A great counter puncher can beat Pac the JMM fights showed this.

yeah several weight divisions lower. PAC's gonna kill him now.

[M.I Truth ?]

All fighters can be beaten.

[MoneyMayFan]

Pac has loses on his resume......nuff said

[soyotoyapex]

Pac has loses on his resume......nuff said

*****s are really living in the past. Thats why they still thought Floyd is the best

[GOD-FR33]

In my opinion.....

It's all opinion REALLY but I would like to state that I kinda disagree. My way of saying it is STYLES COMPLICATES FIGHTS but doesn't necessarily MAKE FIGHTS because if it's the right fighter who is smart enough and special enough to adjust to his opponents STYLE, then it makes more sense to say that one fighter has the style to complicate his opponents. YES? NO? SOME WHAT? What do you guys think about that? We hear that saying so much in boxing like it should be carved in STONE or something. An example of the point I am trying to make is when SUGAR RAY LEONARD fought MARVIN HAGLER. HAGLER was suppose to embarass RAY and knocked him out but look at what happened. Despite who we think won the fight, LEONARD was smart enough and special enough not to let HAGLER dictate the fight. It was a case where HAGLERs' STYLE COMPLICATED the fight for LEONARD but didn't necessarliy MAKE THE FIGHT. Like I said, it's all a matter of opinion. If they had fought a 2nd time, who's to say that HAGLER wouldn't have won? Noone can say that.

[carts]

for now yeah!! PAC is 11 winning streak... 8 are KO/TKO

[MurderDeathKill]

No fighter is invincible. Because Pac's losses were before he was the caliber fighter he is now, some people overrate him. He can be taken.