Pacquiao vs. Cotto II at 154 is a disgrace!!!!
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
A win Foreman will prove that he in not damaged goods or shot. And, if people feel that Cotto lost cuz he was drained at 145 and that fight was bull**** because it was at 145 then they should have no problem with a rematch happeing at 154...Comment
-
-
There are so many things wrong with this fight. If the rumors are true.
1. Pacquiao beat Cotto to almost an inch of his life in November. I gave Cotto one round. The First. That was a dominating win. This is like Floyd rematching Gatti at 154 to get a belt.
2. Pacquiao and Team put a demand on Cotto to weigh 145 yet they will fight him at 154 Pounds?
3. Cotto will re-match Pacquiao but he doesnt have the balls to re-match Margarito? A guy he was at least compettive with until late. If they are both damaged goods hell fight each other.
4. If Pacquiao wants a belt at 154 Pounds. There is Paul Williams, Sergio Martinez, Cory Spinks and Sergei Dzinziruk. Cherry picking a guy you already handled to get a belt is a punk move. Especially when its just a paper title not lineal. So that means he doesnt have to pick the weakest challenger, there are other paper champs like I mentioned.
5. Floyd Mayweather has been calling out Pacquiao since the second Pac had his hand raised against Cotto. Fight Floyd Mayweather and give boxing fans and your lotyal fans the biggest fight of our era. None of this Margarto, Valero or Cotto crap. Floyd hsnt mentioned NO other opponent except for Pacquiao.
6. Cotto is damaged goods anyway. Arum is a scum bag who is throwing Cotto under the bus completely.
That is all. Poll coming.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Pac-Clottey made sense since Clottey was the next highest ranked welterweight available for pac at the time. This fight makes zero sense.
This comes from a PR source, which have proved over and over in the past are some times full of **** (like reported 100% fact bernard hopkins vs trinidad rematch was signed etc.)Comment
Comment