Pacquiao vs. Cotto II at 154 is a disgrace!!!!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • B.U.R.N.E.R
    ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 30186
    • 1,344
    • 400
    • 47,475

    #11
    Originally posted by savorduhflavor
    The original post is ******ed.

    But I agree that a Cotto-Pac rematch is just as ******ed.
    How is the original post ******ed when you agreed with me? Whats the point of flaming?

    Comment

    • savorduhflavor
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Oct 2008
      • 8194
      • 288
      • 59
      • 14,875

      #12
      Originally posted by No Ceilings
      How is the original post ******ed when you agreed with me? Whats the point of flaming?
      I agree that the fight is ******.

      I disagree with all of your reasons save the one where you mentioned how one sided the first fight was.

      Comment

      • jrosales13
        undisputed champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2008
        • 32632
        • 738
        • 763
        • 40,023

        #13
        Originally posted by No Ceilings
        Williams belt is still a belt. They are all paper champs. Whether he beats Foreman or not a re-match is pointless.
        I hope it is a moot point.
        An interim is a worse then the major 4 Burner, an interim belt is the worse then the IBO belt, if an interim belt coutns then so does regional belts like WBO, NABF, OBPF... Nobody would count an interim belt as a 8 title in 8 weight-classes.

        A win Foreman will prove that he in not damaged goods or shot. And, if people feel that Cotto lost cuz he was drained at 145 and that fight was bull**** because it was at 145 then they should have no problem with a rematch happeing at 154...

        Comment

        • BIGBOXINGFAN
          Undisputed Champion
          • Dec 2009
          • 3365
          • 310
          • 78
          • 10,200

          #14
          Cotto deserves to get a another shot. This time he should ask for blood test.

          Comment

          • ИATAS
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2007
            • 36648
            • 2,509
            • 1,953
            • 50,835

            #15
            Originally posted by No Ceilings
            There are so many things wrong with this fight. If the rumors are true.


            1. Pacquiao beat Cotto to almost an inch of his life in November. I gave Cotto one round. The First. That was a dominating win. This is like Floyd rematching Gatti at 154 to get a belt.

            2. Pacquiao and Team put a demand on Cotto to weigh 145 yet they will fight him at 154 Pounds?

            3. Cotto will re-match Pacquiao but he doesnt have the balls to re-match Margarito? A guy he was at least compettive with until late. If they are both damaged goods hell fight each other.

            4. If Pacquiao wants a belt at 154 Pounds. There is Paul Williams, Sergio Martinez, Cory Spinks and Sergei Dzinziruk. Cherry picking a guy you already handled to get a belt is a punk move. Especially when its just a paper title not lineal. So that means he doesnt have to pick the weakest challenger, there are other paper champs like I mentioned.

            5. Floyd Mayweather has been calling out Pacquiao since the second Pac had his hand raised against Cotto. Fight Floyd Mayweather and give boxing fans and your lotyal fans the biggest fight of our era. None of this Margarto, Valero or Cotto crap. Floyd hsnt mentioned NO other opponent except for Pacquiao.

            6. Cotto is damaged goods anyway. Arum is a scum bag who is throwing Cotto under the bus completely.


            That is all. Poll coming.
            you just wasted your time and energy with this ****. Anyone who actually believes there will be a rematch (at any weight) is foolish.

            Comment

            • B.U.R.N.E.R
              ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2010
              • 30186
              • 1,344
              • 400
              • 47,475

              #16
              Originally posted by savorduhflavor
              I agree that the fight is ******.

              I disagree with all of your reasons save the one where you mentioned how one sided the first fight was.
              It was a blwout. Cotto won 1 round onmy card. The first round. You can argue he won the 5th but I gave that to Pacquiao.

              Comment

              • B.U.R.N.E.R
                ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2010
                • 30186
                • 1,344
                • 400
                • 47,475

                #17
                Originally posted by ИATAS206
                you just wasted your time and energy with this ****. Anyone who actually believes there will be a rematch (at any weight) is foolish.
                Who on here thought Pac-Clottey was an option? I rest my case.

                Comment

                • Hi-Dro
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 10362
                  • 670
                  • 640
                  • 14,224

                  #18
                  Originally posted by kaspa9t9
                  aahhh shutup
                  qouted for the truth

                  Comment

                  • Hi-Dro
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Feb 2010
                    • 10362
                    • 670
                    • 640
                    • 14,224

                    #19
                    Originally posted by No Ceilings
                    Who on here thought Pac-Clottey was an option? I rest my case.
                    almost everyone

                    we knew the only option pac had was with a top rank fighter

                    hence clottey is Top rank

                    Comment

                    • ИATAS
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 36648
                      • 2,509
                      • 1,953
                      • 50,835

                      #20
                      Originally posted by No Ceilings
                      Who on here thought Pac-Clottey was an option? I rest my case.
                      Pac-Clottey made sense since Clottey was the next highest ranked welterweight available for pac at the time. This fight makes zero sense.

                      This comes from a PR source, which have proved over and over in the past are some times full of **** (like reported 100% fact bernard hopkins vs trinidad rematch was signed etc.)

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP