Pacquiao vs. Cotto II at 154 is a disgrace!!!!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hi-Dro
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 10362
    • 670
    • 640
    • 14,224

    #21
    btw you guys argue that cotto was weight drained and i agree with your last point burner that pac needs to fight mayweather but if this fight does happen then all of you who argue cotto was weight drain can take your weight drained BS and shove it up your ass

    Comment

    • B.U.R.N.E.R
      ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2010
      • 30186
      • 1,344
      • 400
      • 47,475

      #22
      Originally posted by jrosales13
      An interim is a worse then the major 4 Burner, an interim belt is the worse then the IBO belt, if an interim belt coutns then so does regional belts like WBO, NABF, OBPF... Nobody would count an interim belt as a 8 title in 8 weight-classes.

      A win Foreman will prove that he in not damaged goods or shot. And, if people feel that [B]Cotto lost cuz he was drained at 145 and that fight was bull**** because it was at 145 then they should have no problem with a rematch happeing at 154...[B]
      There would be people who'd count that as a title. Its Pacquiao they created a belt for his fight with Cotto. Hell it dont matter take Paul out. Fight Martinez or Sergei.

      You forgot to add the part where Pacquiao dropped him, rocked him, stunned him and destroyed him. Now if the 145 Pound fight never happened you would have a point and maybe if it was a tactical chess match and Cotto didnt take puncihment you would have a point but not after that ass whooping. Even Pac fans should have a problem with that fight. A re-match is a disgrace.
      Last edited by B.U.R.N.E.R; 03-09-2010, 11:42 AM.

      Comment

      • RL_GMA
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2008
        • 10271
        • 507
        • 103
        • 26,636

        #23
        Originally posted by No Ceilings
        Who on here thought Pac-Clottey was an option? I rest my case.
        Much more believable than a Cotto vs Pacquiao rematch. Clottey and Pacquiao have never fought.

        Comment

        • B.U.R.N.E.R
          ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2010
          • 30186
          • 1,344
          • 400
          • 47,475

          #24
          Originally posted by RL_GMA
          Much more believable than a Cotto vs Pacquiao rematch. Clottey and Pacquiao have never fought.
          Thats true but I was follwoign all the press releases and artcicles surrounding that PED/Pac/Floyd stuff and Clottey came out of nowhere as an option. A week later the fight was signed. He even mentioned Pac-Margarito this summer in New Jersey. I dont put anything past him.

          Comment

          • WAR MOSLEY
            Banned
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Mar 2010
            • 349
            • 30
            • 14
            • 459

            #25
            Its funny how guy who supported FRAUD JR. vs HATTON 2 fight,make thread like this!

            Comment

            • S A M U R A I
              Bulletproof
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2008
              • 181694
              • 1,495
              • 1,324
              • 1,419,318

              #26
              The fight is pointless and I doubt it happens. But if it did? I don't approve.



              100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

              Comment

              • B.U.R.N.E.R
                ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2010
                • 30186
                • 1,344
                • 400
                • 47,475

                #27
                Originally posted by WAR MOSLEY
                Its funny how guy who supported FRAUD JR. vs HATTON 2 fight,make thread like this!
                Fail. No I didnt. That fight was a joke.

                Comment

                • jrosales13
                  undisputed champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2008
                  • 32632
                  • 738
                  • 763
                  • 40,023

                  #28
                  Originally posted by No Ceilings
                  There would be people who'd count that as a title. Its Pacquiao they created a belt for him. Hell it dont matter take Paul out. Fight Martinez or Sergei.

                  You forgot to add the part where Pacquiao dropped him, rocked him, stunned him and destroyed him. Now if the 145 Pound fight never happened you would have a point and maybe if it was a tactical chess match and Cotto didnt take puncishment you woudl have a point but not after that ass whooping. Even Pac fans should have a problem witht hat fight. A re-match is a disgrace.
                  Nobody counts the diamond as a title for Pac. Is just as meaningful as the damn interim belt that P-Will has. Everybody counts the WBO belt he won from Cotto not the diamond belt.

                  Again if Martinez beats Pavlik. There is a great chance that he will drop his WBC belt and campaign at MW...

                  Dzinziruk is an option but at this stage there is no way of knowing if he is better than Foreman... Since we have not seen Dzinziruk in over a year.

                  What point did I forget? I don't care if the fight was at 145, 147, 154, it don't matter Pac was going to win that fight regardless. I don't agree with the rematch cuz of that. What my point is that for everybody who thinks Pac won that fight cuz Cotto was drained at 145, when they make the Cotto comparison of being drained as Oscar being drained. Then you should not have a problem with this rematch at 154.

                  Is like which is it? Did Pac win because he is the greater fighter period or did he win because Cotto was drained?

                  And, if Cotto beats Foreman you can't even say now that Cotto is damaged goods. So that excuse is out the window also...

                  Comment

                  • Pullcounter
                    no guts no glory
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2004
                    • 42582
                    • 549
                    • 191
                    • 49,739

                    #29
                    Originally posted by No Ceilings
                    There are so many things wrong with this fight. If the rumors are true.


                    1. Pacquiao beat Cotto to almost an inch of his life in November. I gave Cotto one round. The First. That was a dominating win. This is like Floyd rematching Gatti at 154 to get a belt.

                    2. Pacquiao and Team put a demand on Cotto to weigh 145 yet they will fight him at 154 Pounds?

                    3. Cotto will re-match Pacquiao but he doesnt have the balls to re-match Margarito? A guy he was at least compettive with until late. If they are both damaged goods hell fight each other.

                    4. If Pacquiao wants a belt at 154 Pounds. There is Paul Williams, Sergio Martinez, Cory Spinks and Sergei Dzinziruk. Cherry picking a guy you already handled to get a belt is a punk move. Especially when its just a paper title not lineal. So that means he doesnt have to pick the weakest challenger, there are other paper champs like I mentioned.

                    5. Floyd Mayweather has been calling out Pacquiao since the second Pac had his hand raised against Cotto. Fight Floyd Mayweather and give boxing fans and your lotyal fans the biggest fight of our era. None of this Margarto, Valero or Cotto crap. Floyd hsnt mentioned NO other opponent except for Pacquiao.

                    6. Cotto is damaged goods anyway. Arum is a scum bag who is throwing Cotto under the bus completely.


                    That is all. Poll coming.
                    aren't you *****sexuals complaining that cotto was weight drained and that fighter of the decade manny pacquiao had to fight him at a catchweight?

                    Comment

                    • El 7 Mares V.2
                      Shalafi
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 1663
                      • 107
                      • 47
                      • 7,808

                      #30
                      How are people calling Cotto rematch against X or Z opponent instead of demanding for Margarito-Cotto II to happen is beyond me...this is THE fight that needs to happen.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP