Is not fair but that has to be a factor. Because, who is to say if he does fight ATGs that his defense would look that good? I will just say this a poor mans Chavez in Castillo would never been competitive against Whitaker. Ever... Especially at 135... A past prime Whitaker, A whitaker that was not at his best fought a prime Oscar I am talking about the best Oscar version absolute prime and a past prime Whitaker made that prime Oscar look foolish at times. Especially when was it round 2? At the end when Oscar threw 6 lightning quick punches and Whitaker avoided every single one... Again Whitaker was not even in his prime. And, wasn't as untouchable at 147 as he was at 135. But, that is how much of a genious Whitaker was.
i find it so laughable how you put so much stake in pac fighting two "ATGs" that where shot and over the hill. and the other, JMM, kicked his ass over two fights.
you need to get off the ATG ****, you act like they actaully presented a challenege by the time pac fought them when they were nothing but names and shells of their former selves
Mayweather didnt start his career 2007 man. He was boxing 11 years before that.[/QU
That's why i'm asking you what make's him an atg and mosley not?Mosley was in with the better fighter's mosley won some and lost some but that's what happen's when you seek out fighter's on your skill level.If mosley had the same resume that mayweather has do you think he would have a lost?
same way floyd tried to fight Mosley twice but mosley wouldnt get in the ring with him?
i find it so laughable how you put so much stake in pac fighting two "ATGs" that where shot and over the hill. and the other, JMM, kicked his ass over two fights.
you need to get off the ATG ****, you act like they actaully presented a challenege by the time pac fought them when they were nothing but names and shells of their former selves
What did Pacquiao have to do with my post of Whitaker the being the better defensive fighter? Do you have any take on what the post actually said?
Comment