Comments Thread For: Roach: Shane Mosley Has Trouble With Speed/Movement

[IMDAZED]

Thank you sir, you know what they say about great minds...

yeah, think alike and are usually at odds

[Easy-E]

yeah Freddie, which is why you and Manny didn't want to make a fight with Mosley.
Easy to criticize him now that Floyd is fighting him.

Same old **** from Freddie.

[jrosales13]

yeah Freddie, which is why you and Manny didn't want to make a fight with Mosley.
Easy to criticize him now that Floyd is fighting him.

Same old **** from Freddie.

So much Tito and Whitaker talk that I forgot this thread had something to do with Roach...

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

So much Tito and Whitaker talk that I forgot this thread had something to do with Roach...

Me too....

[The Noose]

What else should be more important in a competition? You win first everything else is a very distant 2nd.

For the bold/underlined that should be greatly appreciated that says a lot about a man and his craft.

None of what i saidf was meant as a criticism. I agree with u.

[mazdaru]

Is not fair but that has to be a factor. Because, who is to say if he does fight ATGs that his defense would look that good? I will just say this a poor mans Chavez in Castillo would never been competitive against Whitaker. Ever... Especially at 135... A past prime Whitaker, A whitaker that was not at his best fought a prime Oscar I am talking about the best Oscar version absolute prime and a past prime Whitaker made that prime Oscar look foolish at times. Especially when was it round 2? At the end when Oscar threw 6 lightning quick punches and Whitaker avoided every single one... Again Whitaker was not even in his prime. And, wasn't as untouchable at 147 as he was at 135. But, that is how much of a genious Whitaker was.

i find it so laughable how you put so much stake in pac fighting two "ATGs" that where shot and over the hill. and the other, JMM, kicked his ass over two fights.

you need to get off the ATG ****, you act like they actaully presented a challenege by the time pac fought them when they were nothing but names and shells of their former selves

[mazdaru]

[QUOTE=romebyko;7650215]

Mayweather didnt start his career 2007 man. He was boxing 11 years before that.[/QU

That's why i'm asking you what make's him an atg and mosley not?Mosley was in with the better fighter's mosley won some and lost some but that's what happen's when you seek out fighter's on your skill level.If mosley had the same resume that mayweather has do you think he would have a lost?

same way floyd tried to fight Mosley twice but mosley wouldnt get in the ring with him?

[jrosales13]

i find it so laughable how you put so much stake in pac fighting two "ATGs" that where shot and over the hill. and the other, JMM, kicked his ass over two fights.

you need to get off the ATG ****, you act like they actaully presented a challenege by the time pac fought them when they were nothing but names and shells of their former selves

What did Pacquiao have to do with my post of Whitaker the being the better defensive fighter? Do you have any take on what the post actually said?

[mazdaru]

Personally if you look at my avi you know I think Pac is... I think Bernard Hopkins is also...

why, b/c he fought two shot ATG's that were over the hill? if thats the case. then mosley should be placed higher on the list than Manny, easily.

[jrosales13]

why, b/c he fought two shot ATG's that were over the hill? if thats the case. then mosley should be placed higher on the list than Manny, easily.

That is cool, is all opinion based anyways...