Mosley has a better resume then Floyd because he lost to Winky and Vernon?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • B.U.R.N.E.R
    ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 30186
    • 1,344
    • 400
    • 47,475

    #111
    Originally posted by jrosales13
    A lost against a guy who had a great chance in beating you>a win against a guy who had zero chance in beating you.
    So Andy Koelle has a better resume then Amir Khan. After all he fought Paul Williams and Andre Ward. Going by Walt Liquors logic.

    Comment

    • fabie
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2009
      • 1498
      • 246
      • 180
      • 10,255

      #112
      Originally posted by No Ceilings
      So Andy Koelle has a better resume then Amir khan?
      No, Blue is better than Red! (sarcasm).

      A win is a win is a win. Obviously what can top Mayweather's 40-0 in "numbers"? Nada. But there's many more questions than answers that boxing purists and historians don't even consider him top 10 ATG.

      Everything is relative. I am not totally discounting the value of Mayweather having an "undefeated" record thus far but that's not the issue.....40-0 is 40-0 no matter how you put it.

      But the subjective part is where the questions begin to trickle.

      Comment

      • B.U.R.N.E.R
        ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2010
        • 30186
        • 1,344
        • 400
        • 47,475

        #113
        Originally posted by fabie
        No, Blue is better than Red! (sarcasm).

        A win is a win is a win. Obviously what can top Mayweather's 40-0 in "numbers"? Nada. But there's many more questions than answers that boxing purists and historians don't even consider him top 10 ATG.

        Everything is relative. I am not totally discounting the value of Mayweather having an "undefeated" record thus far but that's not the issue.....40-0 is 40-0 no matter how you put it.

        But the subjective part is where the questions begin to trickle.
        I never even mentioned him being undefeated as an argument.

        Comment

        • Cash Cow
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2009
          • 7662
          • 342
          • 396
          • 8,143

          #114
          Originally posted by fabie
          No, Blue is better than Red! (sarcasm).

          A win is a win is a win. Obviously what can top Mayweather's 40-0 in "numbers"? Nada. But there's many more questions than answers that boxing purists and historians don't even consider him top 10 ATG.

          Everything is relative. I am not totally discounting the value of Mayweather having an "undefeated" record thus far but that's not the issue.....40-0 is 40-0 no matter how you put it.

          But the subjective part is where the questions begin to trickle.
          Who is Shanes best win?

          Comment

          • jrosales13
            undisputed champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2008
            • 32632
            • 738
            • 763
            • 40,023

            #115
            Originally posted by No Ceilings
            So Andy Koelle has a better resume then Amir Khan. After all he fought Paul Williams and Andre Ward. Going by Walt Liquors logic.
            OK but let me use your same example and ask who exactly has Khan fought that you said wow that dude has zero chance in beating the insult of glass chin Khan?

            Like I said to make it more clear now.... A lost to a guy who has great chance in beating you>A win against a guy who has zero chance in beating you....

            Comment

            • Frank Martin
              The Transporter
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • May 2009
              • 2086
              • 100
              • 60
              • 8,551

              #116
              Resume = Overall record. Doesnt matter if is Win, Lose or Draw.

              Great resume is determined by great wins. Doenst matter if you lose as long as it is an elite fighter. Basing resume on wins only is just plain ******. So you are saying Floyd is better than Duran coz Duran loses to the like of Pazienza and Joppy.

              Comment

              • jrosales13
                undisputed champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2008
                • 32632
                • 738
                • 763
                • 40,023

                #117
                Originally posted by Easy Work Jr.
                Who is Shanes best win?
                The first Oscar fight.... Now who has Floyd fought that was better than that version of Oscar? Castillo? Corrales? Hatton? Were they better than that prime WW version of Oscar?

                Comment

                • B.U.R.N.E.R
                  ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 30186
                  • 1,344
                  • 400
                  • 47,475

                  #118
                  Originally posted by jrosales13
                  OK but let me use your same example and ask who exactly has Khan fought that you said wow that dude has zero chance in beating the insult of glass chin Khan?

                  Like I said to make it more clear now.... A lost to a guy who has great chance in beating you>A win against a guy who has zero chance in beating you....
                  This is not what we were arguing in this thread. Walt Liquor said that Shane has a bettre resume then Floyd because of Vernon and Winky. I reminded him that he LOST all 4 fights.

                  by his logic.

                  Oscar is has the greatest resume ever.

                  Jermain Taylor has a better resume then Pac.

                  Andy Koelle has a better resume then Amir Khan.

                  Comment

                  • B.U.R.N.E.R
                    ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2010
                    • 30186
                    • 1,344
                    • 400
                    • 47,475

                    #119
                    Originally posted by jrosales13
                    The first Oscar fight.... Now who has Floyd fought that was better than that version of Oscar? Castillo? Corrales? Hatton? Were they better than that prime WW version of Oscar?
                    Wait the fight where no one knows if Shane was roiding or not?

                    Comment

                    • B.U.R.N.E.R
                      ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 30186
                      • 1,344
                      • 400
                      • 47,475

                      #120
                      Originally posted by Frank Martin
                      Resume = Overall record. Doesnt matter if is Win, Lose or Draw.

                      Great resume is determined by great wins. Doenst matter if you lose as long as it is an elite fighter. Basing resume on wins only is just plain ******. So you are saying Floyd is better than Duran coz Duran loses to the like of Pazienza and Joppy.
                      I like this game.

                      Oscar has a better resume then EVERYBODY.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP