Originally posted by M.I.C.
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Myth: A "Fat" Marquez vs. Mayweather
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by PAKYO View PostNo sense explaining to a *****. You don't understand logic, you don't understand match, you're blinded by hate and idolatry to floyd's **** and you don't even understand what you were writing.
What a waste of oxygen...
Comment
-
Originally posted by M.I.C. View PostYou know you cats will state everything but the obvious and focus on a lie. Here's some truth, Marquez is shorter than Floyd, Marquez has a shorter reach, Marquez is less athletic than Floyd, Marquez certainly doesn't throw his punches as fast as Floyd, Marquez is not as skilled as Floyd.....all these are facts but what we get here is Floyd beat a FAT Marquez. I think the "FAT" comment is meant to insult the 2 fighters, Floyd in particular, and thats not necessary now is it?
I felt robbed with that fight as i was expecting floyd to at least ktfo marquez with all the advantages he had but what a rip-off.
Comment
-
-
Pacquiao started his Career at 106.Marquez started at 126 and Floyd started at 130.Floyd is slower at 146 then at 130.Marquez is slower at 142 then at 126.So its fare if you ask me and Floyd should be given credit for beating Marquez.
If its ok for Floyd to fight Pacquiao its ok for Floyd to fight Marquez cause Pacquaio started at a lower weight class then Marquez.The only reason Pac kept his speed and also got faster moving up cause of the Power of PED`s.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Imhotep View PostPacquiao started his Career at 106.Marquez started at 126 and Floyd started at 130.Floyd is slower at 146 then at 130.Marquez is slower at 142 then at 126.So its fare if you ask me and Floyd should be given credit for beating Marquez.
If its ok for Floyd to fight Pacquiao its ok for Floyd to fight Marquez cause Pacquaio started at a lower weight class then Marquez.The only reason Pac kept his speed and also got faster moving up cause of the Power of PED`s.
What's 'fare' anyway?
Comment
-
Originally posted by M.I.C. View PostCan someone explain to me this myth that Marquez was Fat vs Mayweather. I mean how does a guy go from 135 to 142 and gets fat in the process? I whole 7 pounds!!! I'm sure most real boxing fans have a copy of this fight and unless your blind or just a biased *******, I dont see a "Fat" Marquez. I see a guy that is shorter than Mayweather but still very strong, stout, durable, and solidly built. 142 didn't make Marquez fat or slow, he has always been slower than Floyd, he has always been shorter than Floyd, he has always had a shorter reach than Floyd.
So basically stop making excuses by insulting Marquez, calling him fat, old, slow, etc...Floyd has had 40 fights has he not outsped every opponent regardless of their age and conditioning? Was Chico old fat and slow? Was Zab old fat and slow? Was Hatton, Old fat and slow? Was Castillo Old Fat and Slow?
My guess is that Marquez would of done a lot better vs Pacquiao at 142 on that night than he would vs Mayweather at any weight.who ever said that must be on summit....
Comment
-
Originally posted by Imhotep View PostPacquiao started his Career at 106.Marquez started at 126 and Floyd started at 130.Floyd is slower at 146 then at 130.Marquez is slower at 142 then at 126.So its fare if you ask me and Floyd should be given credit for beating Marquez.
If its ok for Floyd to fight Pacquiao its ok for Floyd to fight Marquez cause Pacquaio started at a lower weight class then Marquez.The only reason Pac kept his speed and also got faster moving up cause of the Power of PED`s.
Comment
Comment