Comments Thread For: Ariza: Pacquiao's Performance Will Frighten Mayweather
Collapse
-
well
YOU started spouting off about how you could say you overheard conversations about industry people and how it somehow made you credible correct?
I know that was directed at me because Coach Webb replied to my post about conversations I had in March 2009 in Houston. The reply you responded to with the above
so since you seemingly are questioning my status within this industry I called you on it
simple
so do we have a deal?
I show you
the nomination I got from an industry standard
my email address showing my current industry job
and a pic of my credentials from boxing events
you leave NSB and dont come back?Comment
-
-
Are you autistic by the way? Not an insult and I don't dislike you but you kind of seem like it.
Wait... Here, tell us your results (not that it could give you the most reliable diagnosis ever) http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/9.12/aqtest.htmlComment
-
Yeah,I can say Floyd is an arrogant ****head with a ****ty personality,I totally dislike him,but he has nothing to do with his color.
I always said Froch is a **** as well.
I like fighters with good personnalities,I don't like pricks.I don't like Mayweather.
I'm a pac fan and I'm not asian at all.Pac took bigger guys,bigger challenges and execute them in exciting fashion.
Is he on drugs??
I don't know.But I know for a fact Floyd is a prick so I don't like him.
I don't like Floyd fans,because they **** on Manny without facts,we don't know if Manny juice,we don't if Hatton and Cotto were really shot after their first loss(Clottey is a threat,Hatton ruined Paulie post Floyd).
They **** on a great fighter without proofs just because they are on Floyd nuts(why I don't know).
But me I can prove Floyd didn't fight the bests for years,I just have to bring his record.
80% of the people who question manny or **** on him like you claimed arent Mayweather fans, A lot of boxing fans who doesnt have any affiliation with Pac or any biase towards him are questioning him and rightly so...Not accusing him but questioning him.Comment
-
Comment
-
proof of this fact please...We don't know what prompted Floyd's camp's su****ions. I would imagine they are privy to more inside information than we are - although two posters in this very thread with industry ties have alluded to the fact that there was in fact su****ion present before Floyd Snr ever opened his mouth.
this is getting ridiculous. let me use margarito using plaster as an analogy. just cause margo got caught using plaster against mosley, doesn't necessarily mean he used plaster against cotto. to prove that he used plaster against cotto you actually have to have evidence from that fight that proves it or you need someone in the margo camp to come out and give a testimoney against margarito. If you can't prove that margarito used plaster against cotto, you can't say that margo used plaster against cotto.Just because Pacquiao has previously tested clean in a different kind of testing doesn't mean it's an impossibility that he's dirty. Isn't America supposed to be a free country? Anyone can suspect anyone of anything until their heart's content. The next step is the gathering of evidence to prove your su****ions - a process which Pacquiao was able to deny due to a catch 22 type situation. Now to me, it's pretty elementary to arrive at the assumption that someone probably has something to hide if they refuse to partake in the process which would end all su****ion and speculation and leaves the accuser simply either right or wrong.
the point: either you have evidence that pac has used roids in the past or you aint got jack ****.
random blood testing from this point on into the future only proves pac is clean from this point on and into the future. it doesn't prove that pac has been using roids this whole time.I always like to keep an open mind so I'm open to the possibility that Pacquiao may be cheating. I refuse to blindly accept that he's either clean or dirty until conclusive evidence is presented. Conclusive evidence meaning random blood testing results in this case.Comment
-
omg you really believe this?Let me explain it for you. Manny went up 13 lbs in that time for Oscar and dropped 4 in his next bout against Hatton. Mayweather went up 8 lbs in a span of only 5 months and stayed there. that adds up to a total of 1 lb you are providing as evidence. That was tricky wording though.
Or how about this in 2003, Manny = 125 Floyd =135
in 2009, Manny =140 Floyd = 147
The answer to your question is fairly obvious. Manny stayed low longer owing to his smaller frame.
your scenario works only if you stopped right there
however
Manny? well he had a fight after Hatton where he weight
144! so now do you add in that he dropped 4 lbs to 138 but then went up 6lbs to 144?
wow the logic some of you use is really stretching truths to the fullest
Manny is a welterweight. In 2009 he was a welterweight at the end of the year
get over this whole smaller man thingComment
-
bwhahahaahhaah!!! if its on the internet it must be trust huh?Are you autistic by the way? Not an insult and I don't dislike you but you kind of seem like it.
Wait... Here, tell us your results (not that it could give you the most reliable diagnosis ever) http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/9.12/aqtest.htmlComment
-
Comment