Mosley is #1 @ WW based on Inactivy???

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mr. Fantastic
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 19036
    • 527
    • 1,328
    • 20,027

    #61
    Originally posted by Sugar Jay
    Why is manny 1 if hes only fought 1 welter weight??? shane fought 1 welter as well, and the welter he beat happend to be the WW champ and the same guy that beat Cotto....
    But Cotto beat him.

    Comment

    • Mr. Fantastic
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2008
      • 19036
      • 527
      • 1,328
      • 20,027

      #62
      Originally posted by JM1
      bro, i just checked the ring ratings and shane is at #2. i also have an issue with shane being at #3. i think jmm should be the one in there
      I know that. This is for the ones on here that think he's #1.

      Comment

      • El Castigador
        Banned
        • Dec 2009
        • 4151
        • 140
        • 0
        • 4,869

        #63
        Originally posted by chicano79us
        But Cotto beat him.
        2 Years ago........

        Comment

        • Mr. Fantastic
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • May 2008
          • 19036
          • 527
          • 1,328
          • 20,027

          #64
          Originally posted by El Castigador
          2 Years ago........
          1-1 in 3 YEARS!!! Such standards lol.

          Comment

          • aristotlemoses
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jan 2008
            • 4372
            • 92
            • 71
            • 11,672

            #65
            what fighter today isn't inactive?
            Inactivity is the one thing that really pisses me off about our sport.

            Comment

            • Iceta Lives
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jan 2010
              • 7178
              • 247
              • 165
              • 13,598

              #66
              Originally posted by chicano79us
              I know that. This is for the ones on here that think he's #1.
              Here's why your thread sucks Chicano. No offense, cause you're my boy and all but you are off the ball big time with this one. You're accusing Mosley of going inactive, but you fail to mention that Pac ducked Mosley big time. The only guy that you can say that Mosley went out of his way not to fight is Paul Williams. But Williams was already fighting at 160 then. Pacquiao is really the cause of Mosley's inactivity if you stop to think about it, because Berto wouldn't step up to the plate until HBO put more money in the pot for both fighters with there 2010 budget.

              How can you put Pacquiao at #1 when Mosley already beat a better fighter than he did (which Margarito is a better fighter than Cotto) and Pacquiao instead fought Cotto when Mosley was already ranked #1 and calling him out like crazy even if he was willing to go down in weight to fight him which would've made the fight somewhat irrelevant to 147, but still.

              I also think Mosley got robbed against Cotto, but that's another topic altogehter.

              Comment

              • Da Hammer
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jul 2008
                • 3393
                • 118
                • 152
                • 9,752

                #67
                Honestly nobody is deserving of the #1 spot. I'm fine with mosley being top because he beat the top dog (margarito) in his last fight. but he won't be there IF Pac beats clottey because he will have a better resume recently. Now if mosley beats floyd then he would get the #1 spot back.

                Comment

                • 407BoriKua
                  Banned
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 974
                  • 77
                  • 29
                  • 1,972

                  #68
                  I actually agree with chicano ok you guys can make the case no one else should be ranked number one cause cotto lost margs no longer there and floyd fought a lightweight and pac only had one fight so shane should be number 1 welter ok but i still dont believe that he should be ranked number 3 p4p hes been inactive for over a year now and you guys could say oh the fight with berto blah blah blah he still didnt fight him. He declined a fight with p will in the last year clottey also said shane said no to him on his facebook before. He could have attempted to fight berto earlier I just think due to his inactivity he shouldnt be ranked p4p number 3 if he beats floyd then u could say hes up there 3 or 2 but imo i dont think he is

                  Comment

                  • HighFlyer
                    Excellence of Execution
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 556
                    • 18
                    • 0
                    • 7,032

                    #69
                    Originally posted by El Castigador
                    Because he is the best WW int he world and the third best fighter in the world.

                    Who would you put at Number 1 WW and number 3 P4P?
                    Cotto beat Mosley.

                    You know nothing about boxing...ur just Floyd's ****-eater

                    Comment

                    • El Castigador
                      Banned
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 4151
                      • 140
                      • 0
                      • 4,869

                      #70
                      Originally posted by HighFlyer
                      Cotto beat Mosley.

                      You know nothing about boxing...ur just Floyd's ****-eater
                      Cotto beat Mosley 2 years ago.

                      So how was Marg the number 1 WW after beating Cotto. When Williams beat Marg two years earlier.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP