??????????????
Can someone explain to me what Nate did to be ranked #2 challenger for bradleys title
Collapse
-
Can someone explain to me what Nate did to be ranked #2 challenger for bradleys title
Last edited by OaktownGhost; 02-15-2010, 05:30 PM. -
-
Comment
-
And Nate is pissed because alot of people say ignorant things like "well Bradley was gonna win anyways", which is just ******. NOBODY knows how a 12 round fight will play out after only 2 rounds are completed. How did Taylor-Froch look after 2 rounds? Get my point?
They should just rematch. Plain and simple. Settle the issue in the ring. It isn't like Bradley has anything else on tap right now anyways.
And dont you find it odd that Nate is the one yelling for the rematch. If he truly felt "outgunned" and "looking for a way out", then calling for a rematch would be a bit strange, dont you think?Comment
-
See, I dont get that. Of course I cant be unbiased, but when I look at this situation I just dont see what Nate did wrong. If I did I would tell him. He was fouled. A headbutt, intentional or not, is a foul. And it caused an internal eye injury that prevented him from continuing. Why should Bradley get the advantage of fighting a one-eyed fighter due to his own foul? And are 12 round fights now determined by only how the first 2 rounds go? And OF COURSE Nate had to tell his cornerman that he couldnt see. The cutman is not an opthamologist, and he doesnt have x-ray vision. Just how was the cutman supposed to know about Nate's internal eye injury unless Nate told him.
And Nate is pissed because alot of people say ignorant things like "well Bradley was gonna win anyways", which is just ******. NOBODY knows how a 12 round fight will play out after only 2 rounds are completed. How did Taylor-Froch look after 2 rounds? Get my point?
They should just rematch. Plain and simple. Settle the issue in the ring. It isn't like Bradley has anything else on tap right now anyways.
And dont you find it odd that Nate is the one yelling for the rematch. If he truly felt "outgunned" and "looking for a way out", then calling for a rematch would be a bit strange, dont you think?Comment
-
See, I dont get that. Of course I cant be unbiased, but when I look at this situation I just dont see what Nate did wrong. If I did I would tell him. He was fouled. A headbutt, intentional or not, is a foul. And it caused an internal eye injury that prevented him from continuing. Why should Bradley get the advantage of fighting a one-eyed fighter due to his own foul? And are 12 round fights now determined by only how the first 2 rounds go? And OF COURSE Nate had to tell his cornerman that he couldnt see. The cutman is not an opthamologist, and he doesnt have x-ray vision. Just how was the cutman supposed to know about Nate's internal eye injury unless Nate told him.
And Nate is pissed because alot of people say ignorant things like "well Bradley was gonna win anyways", which is just ******. NOBODY knows how a 12 round fight will play out after only 2 rounds are completed. How did Taylor-Froch look after 2 rounds? Get my point?
They should just rematch. Plain and simple. Settle the issue in the ring. It isn't like Bradley has anything else on tap right now anyways.
And dont you find it odd that Nate is the one yelling for the rematch. If he truly felt "outgunned" and "looking for a way out", then calling for a rematch would be a bit strange, dont you think?
I understand why he quit, but some fighters have fought through similar circumstances. But I am not is his shoes.
That's what I mean too.Comment
-
-
he got his ass beat by bradley got cut said he couldnt see thats how he got to be ranked number 2 anything else?Comment
Comment