Pacquiao is Henry Armstrong in this era, who is PBF?

[Don Johnson]

looks like the *****s are out numbered here

[Don Johnson]

Instead he beats the guy who beat Pacquiao twice. Try again.

really? who was that? I don't see two losses from one guy on his resume, that's odd. Must be a typo.

[The Great Shark]

really? who was that? I don't see two losses from one guy on his resume, that's odd. Must be a typo.

Only nuthuggers think Pacquiao won.

[Don Johnson]

Only nuthuggers think Pacquiao won.

well, no matter what the you or the whoever thinks, Pacquiao goes down on paper as 1-0-1 against JMM. If you wanna play it liek that, only nuthuggers think floyd beat JLC the first time around but floyd "beat" him twice.

[The Great Shark]

well, no matter what the you or the whoever thinks, Pacquiao goes down on paper as 1-0-1 against JMM. If you wanna play it liek that, only nuthuggers think floyd beat JLC the first time around but floyd "beat" him twice.

Where have you heard me say Mayweather beat JLC twice? Never. It's true Mayweather barely came out on top in the first fight, but that's why he gave him the rematch to remove any doubts. Try again.

[El Castigador]

Where have you heard me say Mayweather beat JLC twice? Never. It's true Mayweather barely came out on top in the first fight, but that's why he gave him the rematch to remove any doubts. Try again.

Not o mention he had a torn rotator cuff in the first fight.

[Khalid X]

By this post you're then making both Pacquiao and Mayweather equal, because they both didn't fight him when he was readily available.

Seriously though Osiris you are officially a ******* for thinking about Pacquiao as such.

How...please explain? I have been consistent in stating that Pac had the option of Cotto vs Mosley. Cotto beat Mosley so it was a clear choice as to who he should face.

When Pac vs May fell apart...the best option at WW was Joshua Clottey. If you disagree with any of this, please explain?

[Khalid X]

Cotto beat Mosley.
Margarito murders Cotto.
Mosley crushes Margarito.

So you want a 38 year old Mosley to rematch Cotto to be an official #1 welterweight?? Haha, you guys are too much.

No. Why don't you guys answer my question. Pac only had two options at the time Cotto or Mosley. Who would you choose if you were Pacquiao? The winner or the loser of the head to head match between the two?

[Doctor_Tenma]

Mosley lost to Cotto and had only have Collazo and Marg as Welter wins


Cotto Has Quintana, Mosley, Judah, Urkal, Gomez and Clottey


Its Debatable. Mosley beat Marg but only has collazo to back his claim

Don't bring up that garbage man, be real dude. You and I know that Cotto was a different animal. Anyway, I don't have a problem with Pacquiao having faced Cotto but Mosley was the more respectable opponent, Mosley beat the man (Margarito). Not that any of this matters.

[Castor_Troy]

Don't bring up that garbage man, be real dude. You and I know that Cotto was a different animal. Anyway, I don't have a problem with Pacquiao having faced Cotto but Mosley was the more respectable opponent, Mosley beat the man (Margarito). Not that any of this matters.

Well at this level (Forums) it doesnt matter.


But the Board for RING have discussed this before Marg-Mosley. And their decision was. The belt wont be on the line because the winner wont clearly and unquestionably be number 1 at Welter because of Mosley's Loss to Cotto and Cotto's superior welter list againts Mosley.


I do agree however than Mosley has the better claim because of the Marg KO. but it is clearly debatable.