Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao is Henry Armstrong in this era, who is PBF?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Rolling Stone View Post
    hmmm he has no logical response because Pacquiao has never dominated a division, he has jumped weight classes picking and choosing the opponent that best suits his style
    He has fought the best at each one of his stops. Who was better at 112 when Pac beat Catchi (sp)? who was better at 126 when he beat Barrera? Who was better at 130 when he beat Marquez? Who was better at 140 when he beat Hatton? How many fighters were better than Cotto when he the fight was made?

    By your posting style I'm guessing your a Floyd d!ck rider?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by El Castigador View Post
      Then dont compare him to Armstrong. It cant even be taken serious.
      Why does every credible boxing analyst/insider makes the comparison? I'm just wasting my time because it's no point arguing with a nuthugging bull**** poster like you burner.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by O.S.I.R.I.S View Post
        Why does every credible boxing analyst/insider makes the comparison? I'm just wasting my time because it's no point arguing with a nuthugging bull**** poster like you burner.
        Its called over-hyping. If you even think hes come close to being Armstrong you need to watch more boxing. Preferably Armstrong.

        Comment


        • so, who is PBF? That is what the TS wants to know....

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Rolling Stone View Post
            hmmm he has no logical response because Pacquiao has never dominated a division, he has jumped weight classes picking and choosing the opponent that best suits his style
            You do know the purpose of being called "the lineal champ" is to show that you have established yourself as the "Man" of your division? Pac has been the best fighter at 112, 126, 130 and 140 according to almost every credible source/person in boxing. I'm just curious as to why you think that many people, who have been around the sport that long, can be wrong?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by O.S.I.R.I.S View Post
              He has fought the best at each one of his stops. Who was better at 112 when Pac beat Catchi (sp)? who was better at 126 when he beat Barrera? Who was better at 130 when he beat Marquez? Who was better at 140 when he beat Hatton? How many fighters were better than Cotto when he the fight was made?

              By your posting style I'm guessing your a Floyd d!ck rider?
              floyd **** rider??? see now you're making this a floyd vs manny discussion...when the **** did i ever mention floyd??? you ****ing idiot.....this discussion is about pacquiao and armstrong....first of all, If you consider Diaz, Hatton and Cotto the best when Pacquiao fought them than you are a pacquiao **** rider......Hatton was coming off a brutal loss to Mayweather, Diaz was nothing but a c level fighter and Cotto was the most obvious cherry picked opponent of Pacquiao's career....

              Comment


              • Originally posted by O.S.I.R.I.S View Post
                He has fought the best at each one of his stops. Who was better at 112 when Pac beat Catchi (sp)? who was better at 126 when he beat Barrera? Who was better at 130 when he beat Marquez? Who was better at 140 when he beat Hatton? How many fighters were better than Cotto when he the fight was made?

                By your posting style I'm guessing your a Floyd d!ck rider?
                Floyd's work at 130 was amazing tho but, as he moved up his choice of opposition just got worse and worse.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by O.S.I.R.I.S View Post
                  You do know the purpose of being called "the lineal champ" is to show that you have established yourself as the "Man" of your division? Pac has been the best fighter at 112, 126, 130 and 140 according to almost every credible source/person in boxing. I'm just curious as to why you think that many people, who have been around the sport that long, can be wrong?
                  Yet you give Floyd no credit for beating Baldimir the 147 Pound LINEAL Champ.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by O.S.I.R.I.S View Post
                    You do know the purpose of being called "the lineal champ" is to show that you have established yourself as the "Man" of your division? Pac has been the best fighter at 112, 126, 130 and 140 according to almost every credible source/person in boxing. I'm just curious as to why you think that many people, who have been around the sport that long, can be wrong?
                    when did i refute the fact that Pacquiao has defeated 4 lineal champs???? Carlos Baldomir was the lineal champ when Mayweather defeated him but Mayweather gets slack for not fighting Margarito......the lineal champ is not always the best in the division

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by El Castigador View Post
                      Its called over-hyping. If you even think hes come close to being Armstrong you need to watch more boxing. Preferably Armstrong.
                      Armstrong is one of my favorite old-school fighters along side Willie Pep and Jack Dempsey. I have forgotten more boxing than you will ever know. I mean just reading a few of your threads lets me know how much of a bull**** poster you are.lol

                      Who makes a thread claiming Floyd would make Duran Quit? Floyd would knock Shane out...and the other dumbass threads you have made..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP