Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Floyd Mayweather vs. Manny Pacquiao: Money Goes Up 2-0

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by street bully View Post
    Hold on a second, since Cotto was "shell" of what he was a damn year and a half ago, what is today's Mosley, you know the slower one with no legs that got ***** slapped by Forrest and Winky twice compared to the Shane of the early 2000s?
    using your logic if for example if pacman , fights lets say mosley then gets brutally ko'd brutally, .then pac fights margarito and gets his ass kicked again , but gets the decision somehow, then mayweather beats pac does mayweather get full credit or props for beating the great pac?? no he doesnt. nothing in life works that way, you beat winners your a winner u beat losers your not as great as the guy that beats winners.. very simple.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by chardrnm View Post
      mayweather should move on and concentrate on fighting mosley. if he loses to mosley then his career is over.
      Why hasen't the MASTER OF AVOIDANCE signed the contract?
      The pretty one can't dictate to the PacMAN inside or outside of the ring!

      Why should the most exciting fighter, since a young Mike Tyson
      submit to frequent needle jabs before a fight, because a chicken ****
      pretender.....wants to "Level the playing field" .....? Pure harassment!
      The MASTER OF AVOIDANCE, has plenty of excuses ready to "AVOID"
      tough competition!!!! The Mosley Fight is not a done deal until PBF actually
      shows up at the MGM GRAND on May 1.

      I look for Mosley putting lots of "HURT" on the Pretty One, and remove the 0.
      If in fact PBF shows up on fight night!







      Sugar Shane might remove the

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by street bully View Post
        No one needs legs to beat margarito. That man lost to Santos for god sakes, and you forget that mosley lost to cotto, and then almost lost to mayorga. The man is basically washed up.
        oh now margarito is no good cuz he lost to a middleweight, yet still took cottos soul, that means that cotto wasnt very good to begin with,right? if he lost to margarito. molsey may be old but pac still ducked his ass, and even mayweather did only reason mayweather stepping up is because he had no choice. margarito has faced better welterweights than pac and mayweather combined pac nor wouldnt even get in the ring with . margarito was the unifed welter champ, buti guess that doesnt count.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by boxingfan76 View Post
          using your logic if for example if pacman , fights lets say mosley then gets brutally ko'd brutally, .then pac fights margarito and gets his ass kicked again , but gets the decision somehow, then mayweather beats pac does mayweather get full credit or props for beating the great pac?? no he doesnt. nothing in life works that way, you beat winners your a winner u beat losers your not as great as the guy that beats winners.. very simple.
          I'm a bit confused reading your posts. Are you giving Pacman credit for beating Cotto? Because if your not then the post is contradicting your point, but if you are giving Pac credit for Cotto then I see whee your going.

          Comment


          • #45
            Round 1 [PACQUIAO] - Mayweather didn't convince the NSAC (ya know, the place that handles the fcking testing) the need for blood tests. That's his fault, not pacs. anyone who sees different needs to be put outta their misery.
            Round 2 [MAYWEATHER] - Mayweather gets to fight mosley (who is better than clottey in my opinion), BUT pac wouldve fought him aswell if the chance ocurred.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by street bully View Post
              No one needs legs to beat margarito. That man lost to Santos for god sakes, and you forget that mosley lost to cotto, and then almost lost to mayorga. The man is basically washed up.
              margs lost to santos a true middle weight,whom then lost to martinez whom marg kod in 3 rounds, and just kicked williams ass in a contercversial loss at jr middleweight. i guess cotto dont have legs then or arms since he lost to margarito, so then why does pac get credit for beating a guy with no arms or legs??

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by I am Legend View Post
                Floyd-Manny = 2-0. Pac stans: "Floyd is afraid of fighting Manny thats why he is fighting Shane".

                Floyd Mayweather Jr is giving Manny's image severe blows and I dont think he can recover from it.
                I don't know what is more amusing. You being happy that Mayweather is supposedly winning outside the ring when he should be winning inside the ring. Or you being happy that a fighter who you have never met, Manny Pacquiao, has a tarnished reputation.

                What is it that you have against Pacquiao? If he took Mayweather's p4p spot, why should it bother you? If he is now considered an all-time great, why should it bother you?

                Are you that much of a supporter of Mayweather that you would wish harm on everyone else who gets equal or more acclaim.

                Yes there are Pac "Stans" Yes there are Floyd "stans"

                This post you just made was the very definition of a "stan."

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by boxingfan76 View Post
                  oh now margarito is no good cuz he lost to a middleweight, yet still took cottos soul, that means that cotto wasnt very good to begin with,right? if he lost to margarito. molsey may be old but pac still ducked his ass, and even mayweather did only reason mayweather stepping up is because he had no choice. margarito has faced better welterweights than pac and mayweather combined pac nor wouldnt even get in the ring with . margarito was the unifed welter champ, buti guess that doesnt count.
                  Gotcha. BTW Cotto heading into Pac wasn't the best Cotto, but he could still handle himself against almost any WW, Margarito included. The Clottey fight wasn't a 'gift' BTW. A gift would have been him opting out in the 6th round and taking the win on an accidental headbutt stoppage. It was a hard fought contest.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    This entire thread is rubbish. How has either guy won anything? Mayweather trashed Pacquiao's image wowzers, an imaginary point....cool guys I'm in first grade again. Pac is suing him in court, so if he wins....one imaginary point for Pac.....woopie.

                    What is the point of posting crap like this. All the entire spectacle did was make it look like boxing is unorganized and unprofessional, cong**** to both parties.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by rod_serrs View Post
                      Gotcha. BTW Cotto heading into Pac wasn't the best Cotto, but he could still handle himself against almost any WW, Margarito included. The Clottey fight wasn't a 'gift' BTW. A gift would have been him opting out in the 6th round and taking the win on an accidental headbutt stoppage. It was a hard fought contest.
                      even roach feels cotto lost that fight, i have a very tough time giving cotto anything but an e for effort , if you get hit 50 more time yes 50 more times in a boxing contest, its hard to say your the winner, that fight was stolen from clottey,bigtime.only reason that fight went cottos way is to set up the pac fight, and because they felt sorry for his ass after the margarito beat down.cotto is a classy guy, but hes no good since marg.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP