Comments Thread For: Floyd Mayweather vs. Manny Pacquiao: Money Goes Up 2-0

[boxingfan76]

LOL!!! The irony, you're thanking the guy that was actually guilty of juicing. I do agree that Mosley is setting a great example and Manny and every other boxers out there should follow, but lets not forget that Manny is not guilty of anything.

yeah manny isnt guilty of juicing he just doesnt want to be tested for juicing.

[street bully]

Who was he supposed to fight? It was Pacquiao or Shane, I do not see what the big deal is. Pacquiao fought Cotto in his last fight who beat Shane.

[Iceta Lives]

Where are the posters on here like Perro and Pullcounter who defended Pac at all costs? Ha. They can't.

[Matisyahu]

Utter crap article I don't even have to read it.

[boxingfan76]

Who was he supposed to fight? It was Pacquiao or Shane, I do not see what the big deal is. Pacquiao fought Cotto in his last fight who beat Shane.

dude that reasoning is absurd, when a guy loses in the way margarito DESTROYED cotto, it no longer counts. circumstances change. cotto wouldnt beat molsey after margs and wouldnt beat him now, cotto couldnt even beat clottey!!lol, thats was a total gift!! manny beating a shell of cotto dont mean ****, it counts when the fighter is coming off of big wins not big losses.why dont pac fans understand that great fighters get credit for beating dudes on winning streaks not losing streaks, its as easy as 123 bro.

[street bully]

dude that reasoning is absurd, when a guy loses in the way margarito DESTROYED cotto, it no longer counts. circumstances change. cotto wouldnt beat molsey after margs and wouldnt beat him now, cotto couldnt even beat clottey!!lol, thats was a total gift!! manny beating a shell of cotto dont mean ****, it counts when the fighter is coming off of big wins not big losses.why dont pac fans understand that great fighters get credit for beating dudes on winning streaks not losing streaks, its as easy as 123 bro.

Hold on a second, since Cotto was "shell" of what he was a damn year and a half ago, what is today's Mosley, you know the slower one with no legs that got ***** slapped by Forrest and Winky twice compared to the Shane of the early 2000s?

[boxingfan76]

Where are the posters on here like Perro and Pullcounter who defended Pac at all costs? Ha. They can't.

oh they do these people and logic dont mix, theyre still saying molsey dont count because he lost to cotto, as if cotto would stand a chance now against any top ten guy,let alone mosley.accoding to these dudes time stands still, if i used their logic pac is no good cuz he lost to morales, since time stands still nothing changes.

[boxingfan76]

Hold on a second, since Cotto was "shell" of what he was a damn year and a half ago, what is today's Mosley, you know the slower one with no legs that got ***** slapped by Forrest and Winky twice compared to the Shane of the early 2000s?

no legs is that why he beat margarito???just look at whom margarito has beaten , if u want to play that game. beating fighters coming off of losses dont count bro, especially 2 in a row or more.

[boxingfan76]

Hold on a second, since Cotto was "shell" of what he was a damn year and a half ago, what is today's Mosley, you know the slower one with no legs that got ***** slapped by Forrest and Winky twice compared to the Shane of the early 2000s?

cotto after margs is shot, the jennings fight he looked like **** even in victory , the clottey fight confirmed it, as he ate 50 more power punches, even roach said cotto is a shot fighter b4 pac fought him cotto is shot and worn tha **** out, no biggie that pac beat him at all or surprise.

[street bully]

no legs is that why he beat margarito???just look at whom margarito has beaten , if u want to play that game. beating fighters coming off of losses dont count bro, especially 2 in a row or more.

No one needs legs to beat margarito. That man lost to Santos for god sakes, and you forget that mosley lost to cotto, and then almost lost to mayorga. The man is basically washed up.