THERE IT IS! the spring chicken line. gotta love it. you calzaghe fans all have the same talking points its hilarious. spring chicken! Lacy! undefeated! so creative. you really have nowhere to go on this one. you think a 43 year old man is not faded? come on admit defeat here. he is still a good fighter but he is far from his best. pretending he's not makes you look like a hater(which you are so well done)
The overrated Bernard Hopkins
Collapse
-
yes clinton mitchell was better than him that day. i don't care that he lost. i'm not one of those calzaghe undefeated fanboys. the reason he lost is cause he didn't know how to box and the only place he boxed was in prison. when he started taking boxing more seriously look how much better he did. you think clinton mitchell would beat him then?
he didn't do better just cause he dropped weight. he did better cause he learned the boxing game. but apparently learning isn't something you are familiar with.
we already acknowledged his skills man...that was about two pages ago...
he did better because he scaled down two divisions and found weaker opposition...lost to an equally sized, equally talented fighter in jones, and after that, continued to beat up on weak opposition...until he lost 2X to another equally sized, equally talented opponent in jermaine taylor...and i've learned that you can't reason with hopkins ballickers, worse than explaining something to an infant....Comment
-
Comment
-
we already acknowledged his skills man...that was about two pages ago...
he did better because he scaled down two divisions and found weaker opposition...lost to an equally sized, equally talented fighter in jones, and after that, continued to beat up on weak opposition...until he lost 2X to another equally sized, equally talented opponent in jermaine taylor...and i've learned that you can't reason with hopkins ballickers, worse than explaining something to an infant....
look what happened when he went back up to light heavy when he learned the craft of boxing. he beat the best light heavy in the world so your claim holds absolutely no merit. he couldn't beat clinton mitchell when he had no boxing knowledge but then he's able to beat tarver when he does. basically you are saying clinton mitchell is better than tarver. hilarious.Last edited by daggum; 01-28-2010, 03:07 AM.Comment
-
-
Hopkins won all the fights or arguably won the fights in which he was the underdog. That is not being overrated.Comment
-
no **** he's overrated, why is he still in the p4p rankings, and why is he the number 1 lightheavyweight? bull****Comment
-
Jermain was the **** until just about every fight after HopkinsComment
Comment