Originally posted by NorvernRob
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Was Dirrell-Froch the biggest robbery of 2009?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by donkim View PostThere were three awful decisions that stood out last year.Martinez vs Cintron,funeka vs Guzman and froch vs Dirrell.
You will never hear a convincing argument as to how froch somehow deserved the decision because it's impossible to make without sounding like a moron.
Have you noticed how the froch apologists will only point to Dirrell's "negative" style and what he did wrong rather than what froch himself did right?
Anyody who can score a fight(and it's not difficult) would have scored it in Dirrell's favour by a wide margin due to Dirrell's clean effective punching.
froch was not an effective aggressor and he was not throwing or landing clean effective punches.
You have no clue what you're talking about.Had Malignaggi not acted like a crybaby,and had the scorecards not been so ridiculously wide,you would never have had the nerve to have claimed that fight to have been a robbery.
Please do tell us how many and which rounds Malignaggi won and how he won this fight so decisively
Why should he have? He outboxed froch throughout the entire fight throwing and landing the far cleaner,more effective punches.
Quite amazing that anyone would have the nerve to claim that the Dirrell-froch fight was just while completely discrediting Juan Diaz's effort in which he did actually land punches
ill refresh your memory a bit if you forgot;
Last edited by z0jo; 01-20-2010, 07:19 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Method Checker View PostI still don't know how some people can even dare attempt to say that Froch won it. Dirrell truly outclassed Froch and made him his *****.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by South318 View PostDirrell has a good future. He's getting experience early that'll help him later in his career.
Comment
-
Completely agree that Dirrell should have won that fight, Froch landed very little in the way of effective punches and looked amateurish the whole fight, but Dirrell lost that fight for himself by fighting ugly, he had to make a statement for the hometown to not give it to Froch.
Funeka was the victim of the biggest robbery this year.
Comment
-
People are simply justifying a robbery by claiming that Dirrell didn't do enough in froch's backyard.
These so called boxing fans will cry,piss and moan at a decision they don't like in a close fight,and yet they will ignore and apologise for a bad decision just because the victim didn't do enough to please them.
Originally posted by z0jo View Postquick question who did have winning in martinez-william fight?
ill refresh your memory a bit if you forgot;
I don't like Paul Williams(which is perhaps why you made this post) but I can accept that it was a very close fight in which I thought that Martinez deserved the nod but no respectable case for a robbery can be made in such a close fight
It doesn't change the fact that Williams lack of fundamentals were exposed once again by a boxer who didn't provide a stationary target for Williams.Last edited by donkim; 01-20-2010, 07:27 PM.
Comment
Comment