I still don't know how some people can even dare attempt to say that Froch won it. Dirrell truly outclassed Froch and made him his *****.
Was Dirrell-Froch the biggest robbery of 2009?
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
Dirrell didn't deserve **** for the way he pussied around in that fight. He will have learned a valuable lesson from it - that constant holding, turning your back, falling on your knees and moaning to the ref doesn't score you any points.Comment
-
Comment
-
So landing three times the amount of punches than the other guy doesn't you win a fight? Please.. most of Froch's punches were landed on the back of the head.
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
I guess holding in excess, flailing around, intentionally falling to the floor, and getting manhandled by your opponent.....all while landing more ineffective pitty pat shots than your opponent= dominant victory
It was a close fight and Dirrell didn't show enough aggression throughout to get the nod.Comment
-
The mere Fact that Froch landed like 5 punches in this fight leads me to believe it was a robbery. Everyone I was watching with it agreed, and we went in wanting Froch to win.Comment
Comment