Tweet
[QUOTE=ИATAS206;7310774]You still haven't figured out to quote properly? Are you really that ******ed? You've only been posting on message boards for 6+ years...
i'll chop your garbage up the way i feel like it
Everyone he fuucking fought at 160 was equal in size besides Oscar and Tito, those are the only two guys that came from smaller weight classes (even though they both had previous fights at 160).
@ 160, he was a natural lightheavy who beat up on middles, jr. welters, and welters moving up...as a lightheavy, he was beating up on blown up middles...
Yeah because he grossly outsizes tarver and glen johnson right? Oh it was a huge conspiracy against Tarver - Bhop paid of Rocky to hire him as the villain and to get him fat, then lose the weight. ALL PART OF BHOPS MASTER PLAN!!! I'm sure he planned that for YEARS.
please man everybody makes a big deal about hopkins beating glen johnson...glen johnson hadn't fought anyone of hopkins caliber back then, and hopkins again gets credit for picking the right time to challenge and beat tarver, albeit tarver did just finish doing a flick with stallone...
And then you say of equal talent. He beat everyone, no one was as equally as talented as him besides probably Roy Jones. By the time he started losing he was 40 years old against taylor and 43 against Clazaghe. And both of those guys he was the more talented fighter, he lost against both of those guys because the judges didn't like his low output of punches. Even calzaghe stans agree that if hopkins would have thrown more punches in the final rounds he would have/could have won. But again, he's 43 at that point. So your entire post is once again completely ******ed. Thanks for wasting my time.
he lost to jones in '93, and HE chose to remain at 160, and fight a who's who of bums and little men for the next 10 years in obscurity until some big name, big $ welterweights moved up...that's why he went undefeated truthfully...again, as soon as he fought taylor, an equally sized fighter with some talent, he lost 2x despite the fact that taylor was supposed to be green as grass and no challenge whatsoever...he couldn't run taylor over or intimidate him...excuses galore from hopkins ballickers
he beats tarver and is the greatest thing since sliced bread @175, then makes a slew of catchweight fights against blown up middleweights, his usual m.o. then he loses to calzaghe, once again, a fighter close to his size with equal talent, and here comes the excuses....he finds another slow plodding, blown up middleweight in pavlik to look good against, and he's the greatest thing since sliced bread again....now @ 43, these fools still rank him #4 p4p?
on tv he claims he wants to fight the winner of johnson/dawson or adamek, dawson won, adamek moved up to heavy, and hopkins is sending roy jones slave contracts and is still willing to fight him, despite jones being ko'd in the first round...just face it man.....hopkins is a joke and so are you...
i'll chop your garbage up the way i feel like it
Everyone he fuucking fought at 160 was equal in size besides Oscar and Tito, those are the only two guys that came from smaller weight classes (even though they both had previous fights at 160).
@ 160, he was a natural lightheavy who beat up on middles, jr. welters, and welters moving up...as a lightheavy, he was beating up on blown up middles...
Yeah because he grossly outsizes tarver and glen johnson right? Oh it was a huge conspiracy against Tarver - Bhop paid of Rocky to hire him as the villain and to get him fat, then lose the weight. ALL PART OF BHOPS MASTER PLAN!!! I'm sure he planned that for YEARS.
please man everybody makes a big deal about hopkins beating glen johnson...glen johnson hadn't fought anyone of hopkins caliber back then, and hopkins again gets credit for picking the right time to challenge and beat tarver, albeit tarver did just finish doing a flick with stallone...
And then you say of equal talent. He beat everyone, no one was as equally as talented as him besides probably Roy Jones. By the time he started losing he was 40 years old against taylor and 43 against Clazaghe. And both of those guys he was the more talented fighter, he lost against both of those guys because the judges didn't like his low output of punches. Even calzaghe stans agree that if hopkins would have thrown more punches in the final rounds he would have/could have won. But again, he's 43 at that point. So your entire post is once again completely ******ed. Thanks for wasting my time.
he lost to jones in '93, and HE chose to remain at 160, and fight a who's who of bums and little men for the next 10 years in obscurity until some big name, big $ welterweights moved up...that's why he went undefeated truthfully...again, as soon as he fought taylor, an equally sized fighter with some talent, he lost 2x despite the fact that taylor was supposed to be green as grass and no challenge whatsoever...he couldn't run taylor over or intimidate him...excuses galore from hopkins ballickers
he beats tarver and is the greatest thing since sliced bread @175, then makes a slew of catchweight fights against blown up middleweights, his usual m.o. then he loses to calzaghe, once again, a fighter close to his size with equal talent, and here comes the excuses....he finds another slow plodding, blown up middleweight in pavlik to look good against, and he's the greatest thing since sliced bread again....now @ 43, these fools still rank him #4 p4p?
on tv he claims he wants to fight the winner of johnson/dawson or adamek, dawson won, adamek moved up to heavy, and hopkins is sending roy jones slave contracts and is still willing to fight him, despite jones being ko'd in the first round...just face it man.....hopkins is a joke and so are you...
Comment