Tweet
it's a contradiction to what floyd is accusing pacquiao of, because floyd is using a substance which aids him to compete. floyd wouldn't be able to get through a fight without it, it's not something that is natural and it's banned in the majority states in combat sports.
since it is a foreign substance and not naturally produced by the body, and is injected into the area for it's numbing capabilities, which allows floyd and others who use it to not feel pain, makes it a performance enhancing drug, because it's enhancing their pain threshold or removing it where broken hands, sore hands, and sprains are a part of the sport, boxing is the pain game, and using xylocaine is a way to get around the pain, which is a form of cheating if you really want to break it down.
something that can end the fight, a broken hand, is now avoided because the guy can't feel it, which wouldn't be the case if he wasn't taking a drug, and yes it is a drug. that is cheating, it would be like comparing a corked bat to someone who is juicing. it's now ok to have this corked bat but you can't take anything to will produce the same out come, just in another form.
i'm in no way shape or form am saying it's ok to take roids or anything, but it's not a level playing field for the guy who is going up against a guy who is numbed up and can't feel anything.
if a fighter has to stop fighting because he broke his hand, and that would be his choice, but if he hurt his hand and stopped that would be a fair fight, but if he's doped up and can't feel a thing, then he's had outside help, which it isnt him, it's the dope that has gotten him through the fight, and is that really fair to the guy who hasn't used anything? i say no, because it wasn't the fighter all by himself that got through the fight, it was him with the help of a drug...............
i'm not saying that it's ok for someone to do roids because someone else is taking a drug that allows them to get through the pain, but what i'm saying it's really not that fair.
if there are methods of using drugs to help a fighter get through the fight, then where is the line drawn for other fighters to use other drugs that would aid them in getting through the fight? i say if you allow one, you have to allow them all.......... it's not all that fair saying it's ok to use this and not that.
with this hand numbing ****, would anyone be upset of they were shooting it all up in their face and body? so they wouldnt feel the punch from their opponent?
and what about if someone using it killed another fighter in the ring? would it raise a question of how fair it is? i bet it would.
or what about a fighter like floyd who uses it, does damage to their hand, doesn't know about it keeps fighting, and permanently injured their hand and forced to retire? now, how fair is it to the fighter who career is ruined because he thought that he was helping himself to win using a drug. not fair really but it was his or hers choice, but the point im making is, if it was illegal all around it wouldnt happen. this last point i am making is to show a different point of view on the situation.
bottom line, it is a PED if it is helping you do something that you can't normally do on your own, and masking the pain is something you can do, but it's a choice when it happens, not a set up to not happen through the aid of dope. it's a derivative of *******, it's dope, no ifs, ands, or buts........
all the while there is no proof of pacquiao taking any PEDs, roids, or hgh.
since it is a foreign substance and not naturally produced by the body, and is injected into the area for it's numbing capabilities, which allows floyd and others who use it to not feel pain, makes it a performance enhancing drug, because it's enhancing their pain threshold or removing it where broken hands, sore hands, and sprains are a part of the sport, boxing is the pain game, and using xylocaine is a way to get around the pain, which is a form of cheating if you really want to break it down.
something that can end the fight, a broken hand, is now avoided because the guy can't feel it, which wouldn't be the case if he wasn't taking a drug, and yes it is a drug. that is cheating, it would be like comparing a corked bat to someone who is juicing. it's now ok to have this corked bat but you can't take anything to will produce the same out come, just in another form.
i'm in no way shape or form am saying it's ok to take roids or anything, but it's not a level playing field for the guy who is going up against a guy who is numbed up and can't feel anything.
if a fighter has to stop fighting because he broke his hand, and that would be his choice, but if he hurt his hand and stopped that would be a fair fight, but if he's doped up and can't feel a thing, then he's had outside help, which it isnt him, it's the dope that has gotten him through the fight, and is that really fair to the guy who hasn't used anything? i say no, because it wasn't the fighter all by himself that got through the fight, it was him with the help of a drug...............
i'm not saying that it's ok for someone to do roids because someone else is taking a drug that allows them to get through the pain, but what i'm saying it's really not that fair.
if there are methods of using drugs to help a fighter get through the fight, then where is the line drawn for other fighters to use other drugs that would aid them in getting through the fight? i say if you allow one, you have to allow them all.......... it's not all that fair saying it's ok to use this and not that.
with this hand numbing ****, would anyone be upset of they were shooting it all up in their face and body? so they wouldnt feel the punch from their opponent?
and what about if someone using it killed another fighter in the ring? would it raise a question of how fair it is? i bet it would.
or what about a fighter like floyd who uses it, does damage to their hand, doesn't know about it keeps fighting, and permanently injured their hand and forced to retire? now, how fair is it to the fighter who career is ruined because he thought that he was helping himself to win using a drug. not fair really but it was his or hers choice, but the point im making is, if it was illegal all around it wouldnt happen. this last point i am making is to show a different point of view on the situation.
bottom line, it is a PED if it is helping you do something that you can't normally do on your own, and masking the pain is something you can do, but it's a choice when it happens, not a set up to not happen through the aid of dope. it's a derivative of *******, it's dope, no ifs, ands, or buts........
all the while there is no proof of pacquiao taking any PEDs, roids, or hgh.
at people thinking Floyd uses this during the fight, that is illegal. I see both side thinking this. He does not use this during a fight. 
a ******* thought that you were going against my arguement in the other thread i made.
Comment