WBA, WBC, IBF, IBO, WBO....Which Belt is Most Credible??

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TheStoneRoses
    Banned
    • Jan 2010
    • 274
    • 21
    • 0
    • 466

    #1

    WBA, WBC, IBF, IBO, WBO....Which Belt is Most Credible??

    I want to know your thoughts........i really wish that one day we get back to having 1 champ for every division like it used to be because its far too easy for boxers to become champs these days and its unfair to fighters of the past who had to fight the 1 real champ in a divison to be recognised as the best
    55
    WBO
    10.91%
    6
    WBA
    10.91%
    6
    WBC
    38.18%
    21
    IBF
    5.45%
    3
    IBO
    1.82%
    1
    Fukk all of em
    32.73%
    18
  • jrosales13
    undisputed champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2008
    • 32632
    • 739
    • 763
    • 40,023

    #2
    Out of those 5 I personally will pick the IBO...

    Comment

    • TheStoneRoses
      Banned
      • Jan 2010
      • 274
      • 21
      • 0
      • 466

      #3
      Originally posted by jrosales13
      Out of those 5 I personally will pick the IBO...
      i didnt add the ring belt or any of the other bull****e paper titles

      Comment

      • tanibanana
        Banned
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • May 2009
        • 690
        • 484
        • 623
        • 8,924

        #4
        RING > WBO > IBF > WBC > IBO > WBA (in todays standard..)
        RING > WBC > WBA > IBF (ten years ago..)

        well that's just me..

        Comment

        • jrosales13
          undisputed champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2008
          • 32632
          • 739
          • 763
          • 40,023

          #5
          Originally posted by TheStoneRoses
          i didnt add the ring belt or any of the other bull****e paper titles
          Ring belt is more credible than those 5...

          Lineal>Ring>IBO>the 4 major....

          Comment

          • tanibanana
            Banned
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • May 2009
            • 690
            • 484
            • 623
            • 8,924

            #6
            Originally posted by jrosales13
            Ring belt is more credible than those 5...

            Lineal>Ring>IBO>the 4 major....
            Agree..

            the value of Ring belt is like holding 2 of the major 4 belts at the same time..

            Comment

            • TheStoneRoses
              Banned
              • Jan 2010
              • 274
              • 21
              • 0
              • 466

              #7
              Originally posted by jrosales13
              Ring belt is more credible than those 5...

              Lineal>Ring>IBO>the 4 major....
              this is the thing thats pisses me off mate.....other than the 5 belts i listed, you have the ****ing ring belt, lineal, diamond etc etc .....i mean seriously, wtf is going on

              Comment

              • jrosales13
                undisputed champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2008
                • 32632
                • 739
                • 763
                • 40,023

                #8
                Originally posted by TheStoneRoses
                this is the thing thats pisses me off mate.....other than the 5 belts i listed, you have the ****ing ring belt, lineal, diamond etc etc .....i mean seriously, wtf is going on
                The Ring has a longer history then those 5 you mentioned... And, the Diamond is part of the WBC...

                Comment

                • TheStoneRoses
                  Banned
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 274
                  • 21
                  • 0
                  • 466

                  #9
                  Originally posted by TheStoneRoses
                  this is the thing thats pisses me off mate.....other than the 5 belts i listed, you have the ****ing ring belt, lineal, diamond etc etc .....i mean seriously, wtf is going on
                  so why doesn't Baldomir get the credit he deserves if The Ring belt is more credible than the major 4??? people claiming that Margarito was better than baldomir but Baldomir was the Ring Champion

                  Comment

                  • Gopgop
                    ~WaVy BaBy~
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Nov 2006
                    • 523
                    • 17
                    • 20
                    • 6,979

                    #10
                    i hope all you guys are joking..IBO?! that no name ass belt wtf

                    It really goes WBC,IBF,WBA,WBO. everything else is irrelevant

                    the ring magazine belt is ****** too.

                    only reason i see IBO up there is cus Manny had it and that tells me you know nothing about the IBO or their champions...IBO gets ****ted on by everyone else...so does WBO

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP