I want to know your thoughts........i really wish that one day we get back to having 1 champ for every division like it used to be because its far too easy for boxers to become champs these days and its unfair to fighters of the past who had to fight the 1 real champ in a divison to be recognised as the best
WBA, WBC, IBF, IBO, WBO....Which Belt is Most Credible??
Collapse
-
WBA, WBC, IBF, IBO, WBO....Which Belt is Most Credible??
55WBO10.91%6WBA10.91%6WBC38.18%21IBF5.45%3IBO1.82%1Fukk all of em32.73%18Tags: None -
-
Comment
-
RING > WBO > IBF > WBC > IBO > WBA (in todays standard..)
RING > WBC > WBA > IBF (ten years ago..)
well that's just me..Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
The Ring has a longer history then those 5 you mentioned... And, the Diamond is part of the WBC...Comment
-
so why doesn't Baldomir get the credit he deserves if The Ring belt is more credible than the major 4??? people claiming that Margarito was better than baldomir but Baldomir was the Ring ChampionComment
-
i hope all you guys are joking..IBO?! that no name ass belt wtf
It really goes WBC,IBF,WBA,WBO. everything else is irrelevant
the ring magazine belt is ****** too.
only reason i see IBO up there is cus Manny had it and that tells me you know nothing about the IBO or their champions...IBO gets ****ted on by everyone else...so does WBOComment
Comment