Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Seriously sick of all this Mayweather hating from Pac fans.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Get used to it because its always going to be there just like mayweather fans are going to hate on pac.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Kok123 View Post
      liar. Lying sack of ****. Find it yourself, and stop lying to yourself.

      you sad that I exposed you?
      You have to do something to expose someone, you cant just say "I exposed you!" Like, I produce evidence to prove you're a moron (see below), and you attempt to counter it, which you cant because you just pulled the thing about me hating pac right out of your ass.

      http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...ao#post6928713
      12-10-2009
      Originally posted by paulf View Post
      Floyd is going be on the canvas man. Pacquiao is just too damn good at this point. 24/7 ratings are going to be INSANE.
      http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...92#post6613592
      11-12-2009
      Originally posted by paulf View Post
      Been good watchin' ya Cotto, good luck in whatever you pursue after Pac retires ya.
      http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...20#post6777320
      11-24-2009
      Originally posted by paulf View Post
      He beat the **** out of Diaz.
      He beat the **** out of Oscar.
      He beat the **** out of Ricky.
      He beat the **** out of Cotto.

      How many rounds were won between the four of them combined against Pacquiao? Cotto's One? Quit making excuses. He dominated all of them.


      Last edited by paulf; 01-17-2010, 03:07 AM.

      Comment


      • #63
        Just say that I exposed you. Don't worry about it. It's my job to exposed lying sack of **** such as yourself.

        sad?

        Comment


        • #64
          Arguing with a brick wall.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by paulf View Post
            You have to do something to expose someone, you cant just say "I exposed you!" Like, I produce evidence to prove you're a moron (see below), and you attempt to counter it, which you cant because you just pulled the thing about me hating pac right out of your ass.
            Is that like the Mayweathers need to provide evidence that Manny is juicing,

            or is their word good enough for people to believe it?

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by TortillaWarrior View Post
              Is that like the Mayweathers need to provide evidence that Manny is juicing,

              or is their word good enough for people to believe it?
              Thats what the blood tests for.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by paulf View Post
                Arguing with a brick wall.
                Just say you got exposed. I mean you are a lying sack of ****, correct?

                Just say it ***** of Mayweather.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by paulf View Post
                  Thats what the blood tests for.
                  So, whats the NSAC for ?


                  But yea, I like your double standard.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by baracuda View Post
                    floyd's bitchass needs to prove the critics wrong.......
                    and what about the OTHER ***** ass dude....shouldn't he just agree to taking the tests?!?.....come on man......they BOTH rubbed the fans the wrong way with their diva ass ways....its a ****in shame....shame on BOTH fanbases for NOT disowning these 2 lil' girls......love is TRULY blind!!!!

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by thatnickuh View Post

                      You're here to defend Pacquiao by any means necessary. The excuses or "theories" that you have given to defend Pacquiao are neverending, yet none of them are valid. That's why I brush them aside. Heres an example. You keep talking about how a test after the fight is good enough, and that just shows how ignorant you are when it comes to PEDs and how athletes can use them and still beat the current system. If you weren't so biased, you would've taken the time to find out why a drug test after the fight is not a full proof way to catch somebody who has been using PEDs. The information is out here, you just don't want to be bothered by anything that may contradict your biased stance on this issue. Pacquiao is your God. Your ;probably pray to him everynight before you go to bed.
                      You see, taking the test RIGHT AFTER the fight is not good enough. It is the BEST time. Consider this: Let's assume Pac is taking PEDs, etc... It's very logical that his "supplement" should be able to make him last the whole twelve rounds to make him effective. now, let's assume that he finishes off floyd by a first round TKO. Then HE HAS to undergo the blood test as soon as he's back in his dressing room right? Bingo. He's gonna test positive since the "supplement's effect doesn't wear off until the end of the twelfth round. Now tell me, how the hell is "taking the blood test right after the fight" not good enough?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP