I don't consider any man to be perfect or God. Stop building up straw men and deal with what I say instead of trying to put words in my mouth. I've looked at this situation from Pacquiao's side, and I've seen no valid reason(other than he's dirty, or he just doesn't want to fight Mayweather) that he should walk away from this fight. I simply don't buy the BS that his team is selling. You buy it though, don't you? Which one of the countless excuses from team Pacquiao do you believe in the most?
The only thing that I'm here to do is give my honest opinion on things. I'm not here to indict Pacquiao. I don't know whether he uses PEDs or not, and I've never accused him of using them. I've said that his refusal to comply with the random blood testing makes it looks like he has something to hide, whether thats fear of Mayweather or fear of being caught using PEDs. No, I don't believe that Mayweather is culpabale in this fight not being made. The evidence supporting the opinion that Pacquiao is the one who didn't really want this fight is overwhelming, yet you ignore it in favor of parroting the same tired talking points over and over. "What's the difference between 24 days and 14 days? Why isn't the test after the fight enough? Pacquiao's feelings were hurt because Mayweather's crackhead father accused him of using PEDs. There's no proof, so it's wrong to accuse him of using. Pacquiao has a phobia about giving blood. He feels that he was weakened when he fought Morales. blah blah blah". You'll say anything to divert attention away from the fact that Pacquiao walked away from this fight because he didn't want to submit to random blood testing(or fear of Mayweather). You'll buy any BS excuse his team gives for refusing the tests without questioning him, no matter how many times they contradict themselves. You're not a boxing fan, you're a groupie.
This isn't about other cultures or anything else you want to bring up in an attempt to cloud the issue. This is about the Pacquiao-Mayweather fight being called off because one of the fighters refuses to submit to random blood testing. I don't care who the names are, I would side against the athlete who is refusing more stringent testing. Especially in this day and age when we know that athletes are using things that are against the rules to gain unfair advantages. I just can't fathom why any true sports fan would defend an athlete refusing strict drug tests, especially under these circumstances. If the situation was reversed, I'd be looking at Mayweather funny and would blame him for the fight not being made. I have no loyalties to Mayweather or his team. I'm a fan of the sport over any one particular fighter.
The only thing that I'm here to do is give my honest opinion on things. I'm not here to indict Pacquiao. I don't know whether he uses PEDs or not, and I've never accused him of using them. I've said that his refusal to comply with the random blood testing makes it looks like he has something to hide, whether thats fear of Mayweather or fear of being caught using PEDs. No, I don't believe that Mayweather is culpabale in this fight not being made. The evidence supporting the opinion that Pacquiao is the one who didn't really want this fight is overwhelming, yet you ignore it in favor of parroting the same tired talking points over and over. "What's the difference between 24 days and 14 days? Why isn't the test after the fight enough? Pacquiao's feelings were hurt because Mayweather's crackhead father accused him of using PEDs. There's no proof, so it's wrong to accuse him of using. Pacquiao has a phobia about giving blood. He feels that he was weakened when he fought Morales. blah blah blah". You'll say anything to divert attention away from the fact that Pacquiao walked away from this fight because he didn't want to submit to random blood testing(or fear of Mayweather). You'll buy any BS excuse his team gives for refusing the tests without questioning him, no matter how many times they contradict themselves. You're not a boxing fan, you're a groupie.
This isn't about other cultures or anything else you want to bring up in an attempt to cloud the issue. This is about the Pacquiao-Mayweather fight being called off because one of the fighters refuses to submit to random blood testing. I don't care who the names are, I would side against the athlete who is refusing more stringent testing. Especially in this day and age when we know that athletes are using things that are against the rules to gain unfair advantages. I just can't fathom why any true sports fan would defend an athlete refusing strict drug tests, especially under these circumstances. If the situation was reversed, I'd be looking at Mayweather funny and would blame him for the fight not being made. I have no loyalties to Mayweather or his team. I'm a fan of the sport over any one particular fighter.

[/IMG][/IMG]
[/IMG]

Comment