Who's better: Cintron or Clottey? And who would win in a fight?

[dans]

No I disagree, the greater fighter wouldn't be scared of a random blood test

Get out if you want to talk blood tests man. There's plenty of dumb threads for that.

[ThePunchingBag]

No I disagree, the greater fighter wouldn't be scared of a random blood test

The greater fighter would have fought an elite Welterweight by now after 4 years in the division.

[jrosales13]

No I disagree, the greater fighter wouldn't be scared of a random blood test

That is fine but Pac has accomplished stuff that no other fighter... Dude is making history you can't take that away from him no matter what you say... Pac is top 30 ATG... And, I have Floyd outside of the top 50...

[M.I.C.]

No real motive on my part, just seeing what the consensus would be since they're both be mentioned on here. I think it's an interesting matchup. To me it's a toss up. I think Cintron is underrated. There's no shame in losing to a possibly plastered Margarito and a very good prime Martinez (even though he got a draw).

Considering we are at a biased forum it works like this homie, whoever Pac fights is the perceived "greater" opponent. Whoever Floyd fights is the perceived "lesser" opponent. Now I'll give an example, Marquez or Cotto, if you ask me at the time Pac fought Cotto and Floyd fought Marquez....JMM was the better all around fighter. Cotto was over the hill, shop worn beaten up twice, and had Floyd fought him he would of been considered picking on a guy whose going downhill.

[dans]

Ok.. Just checking.

Because you know the usual suspects will use Cintron and Clottey to compare a certain two fighters who I don't even need to mention.

Cintron is a good fighter, I just think he gets discouraged easily.

I think his career might have new life at 154. Don't know how far he'll go, but he definitely has time to turn in a pretty good career.

[M.I.C.]

That is fine but Pac has accomplished stuff that no other fighter... Dude is making history you can't take that away from him no matter what you say... Pac is top 30 ATG... And, I have Floyd outside of the top 50...

Beating Cotto, Hatton, and Oscar at the time Pac beat them really doesn't impress me. All 3 have been beat before, badly and recently.

[Doctor_Tenma]

It's pretty much obvious what some of the agenda is here. In the end it all comes down to one thing; Cintron isn't gonna give Mayweather problems and Clottey isn't gonna give Pacquiao problems. Unless both are on the same card (Which is impossible) I ain't buying either event.

[M.I.C.]

That is fine but Pac has accomplished stuff that no other fighter... Dude is making history you can't take that away from him no matter what you say... Pac is top 30 ATG... And, I have Floyd outside of the top 50...

But the question is.....Can Pac whip Floyd's azz.....I doubt it

[daggum]

Considering we are at a biased forum it works like this homie, whoever Pac fights is the perceived "greater" opponent. Whoever Floyd fights is the perceived "lesser" opponent. Now I'll give an example, Marquez or Cotto, if you ask me at the time Pac fought Cotto and Floyd fought Marquez....JMM was the better all around fighter. Cotto was over the hill, shop worn beaten up twice, and had Floyd fought him he would of been considered picking on a guy whose going downhill.

i lol'd. yea its better to pick on a lightweight then cotto.

[M.I.C.]

It's pretty much obvious what some of the agenda is here. In the end it all comes down to one thing; Cintron isn't gonna give Mayweather problems and Clottey isn't gonna give Pacquiao problems. Unless both are on the same card (Which is impossible) I ain't buying either event.

The Same card!! Now if that was to happen, I would be less mad, might even call these idiot promoters genius