This Al Haymon "stable conflict" is BS

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • THE REED
    Sixty Forty
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2007
    • 43489
    • 1,992
    • 1,483
    • 690,068,075

    #1

    This Al Haymon "stable conflict" is BS

    What if Floyd were to hold belts at Welterweight and Berto would too...

    We would never get a unification because they are both Haymon fighters?

    What if Haymon has two of the best fighters in one/any division... which could very well happen at WW... they will never fight?

    I can't stand Arum, but he certainly doesn't see this as a problem.
  • B u r n e r
    Banned
    • Dec 2009
    • 1287
    • 48
    • 0
    • 1,456

    #2
    Originally posted by reedickyaluss
    What if Floyd were to hold belts at Welterweight and Berto would too...

    We would never get a unification because they are both Haymon fighters?

    What if Haymon has two of the best fighters in one/any division... which could very well happen at WW... they will never fight?

    I can't stand Arum, but he certainly doesn't see this as a problem.
    Arum is a promoter........

    Haymon is Williams, Bertos and Floyds manager.

    Comment

    • Makavelli Jr.
      Banned
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Jan 2010
      • 593
      • 57
      • 10
      • 757

      #3
      Damn.. When i think about it.. Al Haymon is as greedy, if not more greedy then Arum.

      He saves his investment by not advising them to fight.. What a ****ing tool.

      Comment

      • THE REED
        Sixty Forty
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2007
        • 43489
        • 1,992
        • 1,483
        • 690,068,075

        #4
        Originally posted by B u r n e r
        Arum is a promoter........

        Haymon is Williams, Bertos and Floyds manager.
        Point taken... but the question still stands?!?!

        Comment

        • DE100
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Aug 2008
          • 5100
          • 374
          • 59
          • 11,729

          #5
          Also when two of the best fighters fight eachother, neither really loses much value when they loss, so i dont see the problem.

          Comment

          • Dirk Diggler UK
            Deleted
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 48836
            • 1,312
            • 693
            • 58,902

            #6
            I thought the fact that Haymon managed them both would make it easier to get the fight done.

            Comment

            • -MAKAVELLI-
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Aug 2008
              • 50080
              • 3,580
              • 2,792
              • 169,000

              #7
              Originally posted by reedickyaluss
              What if Floyd were to hold belts at Welterweight and Berto would too...

              We would never get a unification because they are both Haymon fighters?

              What if Haymon has two of the best fighters in one/any division... which could very well happen at WW... they will never fight?

              I can't stand Arum, but he certainly doesn't see this as a problem.


              if that was an Arum 'problem', we'd have unification bouts and rematches every month on ppv


              i'd play that game

              Comment

              • DLT
                DMV
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Nov 2004
                • 17087
                • 737
                • 35
                • 24,277

                #8
                Well alot of people have said that Haymon wont let Floyd fight Berto so thats why Ellerbe always says they will fight Shane if he wins instead of saying they will fight the winner of Berto-Mosley.

                Comment

                • THE REED
                  Sixty Forty
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 43489
                  • 1,992
                  • 1,483
                  • 690,068,075

                  #9
                  Aside from the fact that Floyd wouldn't fight Williams in the first place...

                  Now they ALSO wouldn't because Haymon manages both?

                  I mean WTF.

                  Comment

                  • K-Nan
                    The Stylistic Nightmare
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Nov 2006
                    • 17473
                    • 1,567
                    • 1,844
                    • 530,636

                    #10
                    These are assumptions, honestly. We aren't insiders, and we don't know why certain fights don't get made.

                    If it involves Mayweather and he really wants a fight, I know that Haymon will really have no choice but to let his fighter do his thing- to answer your hypothetical Berto scenario.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP