Al Bernstein: "Floyd and his minions killed the Pacquiao fight."

[Pacquiao'd]

Newsflash: It was in writing. You see it, agree, then send your copy back with your stipulations. Back and forth, back and forth every day then finally you sign off.

Misunderstanding?

ouch, the ownage hurts my eyes ha

[jqSide]

Why compromise? Why didn't they just go along with what they agreed to? They agreed and then one of them tried to change protocol at the last second.

Don't give me that.

This fvkin guy can't even accept a compromise approach. You're in the minority opinion, idiot. The majority are extremely pissed at Fraud Jr. for introducing this sport cleaning crap only fools like you would believe. The world is siding with Pac. See it to believe it.

[IMDAZED]

This fvkin guy can't even accept a compromise approach. You're in the minority opinion, idiot. The majority are extremely pissed at Fraud Jr. for introducing this sport cleaning crap only fools like you would believe. The world is siding with Pac. See it to believe it.

I'm not a sheeple kind of guy so I could give two craps what the "majority" thinks. I also haven't asked everyone, have you? I'm in the minority? Nothing new for me.

[jqSide]

I'm not a sheeple kind of guy so I could give two craps what the "majority" thinks. I also haven't asked everyone, have you? I'm in the minority? Nothing new for me.

Mayweather Sr is probably your idol, idiot.

[flour]

PEDs arent easily detected in the urine dumb ass, thats why they do random BLOOD and urine. whats not seen in the urine can be seen in the blood.

so why do you think they are ok with urine but not blood.

how do you think shane didnt get caught fool?

oh but urine CAN DETECT all PEDS except HGH the gasser and i already promise you the links. it wont be today though cus its time consuming and i might answer u back a couple of hours later


the genesis behind bloodtesting was back in 2000 when they didnt have a urine test to detect HGH, at the same time, HGH was fairly knew, some athletes have been known to use it and why wouldnt they.. it's human growth hormone.. HEY LOOKY LOOKY.. HUMAN GROWTH.. it must enhance your performance somehow since it has growth in it when in reality it doesnt....

this is where the, scientific test have been done to study its effects of this claim comes in and they have found the very opposite, it doesnt help u at all


so bloodtest was invented in 2000 as oppose to urine testing which has been around for 40 years- URINE TEST IS PROBABLY OLDER THAN YOU LOL it has wisdom on what is a drug and what isnt

besides that, blood testing was using as a screening device to find some kind of anomaly in a person's blood signature.. why? because blood test is around 40 bucks and urine test cost 400 dollars.. only when they find an "ANOMOLY" or something out of the ordinary will they then use the more expensive urine
test to test the said athlete on what EXACTLY IT IS that is afoot

now there's over 1000 olympic athletes at any given moment training all year round.. do u think a non-profit organization like the WORLD ANTI DRUG TESTING AGENCY OR THE U.S ANTI-DRUG AGENCY can afford to foot the 400 dollar bill for every athlete when its more frugal to use blood test and save some money and only then use the more expensive urine test to weed out the cheater?

on the shane thing, if u read what i said about no drug test being able to detect unknown drug you woulda known why its that way EDIT:: I SAID CONTE SNITCH BUT I WAS WRONG.. NOW READ THIS..

".....In 2003, the United States Attorney for the Northern District of California began investigating BALCO. U.S. sprint coach Trevor Graham had given an anonymous phone call to the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) in June 2003 accusing a number of athletes being involved in doping with a steroid that was not detectable at the time. He also named Victor Conte as the source of the steroid. As evidence, Graham delivered a syringe containing traces of tetrahydrogestrinone, nicknamed "the Clear."

Shortly after, Don Catlin, MD, the founder and then-director of the UCLA Olympic Analytical Laboratory and now head of the Los Angeles-based nonprofit organization Anti-Doping Research, succeeded in identifying and developing a testing process for tetrahydrogestrinone (THG). Now able to detect the new substance, he tested 550 existing samples from athletes, of which 20 proved to be positive for THG. Later that year, the Chicago Tribune named Catlin Sportsman of the Year. [2]....."


ITS EXACTLY WHY ALL OF THEM ON THE LIST DIDNT GET CAUGHT.. cus no test existed b4 hand and no urine nor blood nor hair sample could see if it was there even if it was staring right at them...they can test whos on the clear NOW via urine or blood by virtue of the snitcher

. thats how you develop drug test.. it always that way.... no amount of bloodtesting, be it random or not would change the fact it will not detect anything else that urine cant excep when it comes to HGH, which gasses you

LMAO why r u asking me all this anyways. didnt you claim YOURE THE PED- TESTER ?

man youre just a *****.. i gtg to work now dont lick floyd too much cus.. im sure u want him to beat manny right? i feel the same way only i want manny to beat him.. isnt that why u watch him? LMAO peace *****

LMAO BUMP AND READ BIGDUNNN and YESSIR.. lol i thought i was talking to bigdunn.. but yah its ur yessir, later *****s

[IMDAZED]

Mayweather Sr is probably your idol, idiot.

Out of retorts?

[IMDAZED]

oh but urine CAN DETECT all PEDS except HGH the gasser and i already promise you the links. it wont be today though cus its time consuming and i might answer u back a couple of hours later


the genesis behind bloodtesting was back in 2000 when they didnt have a urine test to detect HGH, at the same time, HGH was fairly knew, some athletes have been known to use it and why wouldnt they.. it's human growth hormone.. HEY LOOKY LOOKY.. HUMAN GROWTH.. it must enhance your performance somehow since it has growth in it when in reality it doesnt....

this is where the, scientific test have been done to study its effects of this claim comes in and they have found the very opposite, it doesnt help u at all


so bloodtest was invented in 2000 as oppose to urine testing which has been around for 40 years- URINE TEST IS PROBABLY OLDER THAN YOU LOL it has wisdom on what is a drug and what isnt

besides that, blood testing was using as a screening device to find some kind of anomaly in a person's blood signature.. why? because blood test is around 40 bucks and urine test cost 400 dollars.. only when they find an "ANOMOLY" or something out of the ordinary will they then use the more expensive urine
test to test the said athlete on what EXACTLY IT IS that is afoot

now there's over 1000 olympic athletes at any given moment training all year round.. do u think a non-profit organization like the WORLD ANTI DRUG TESTING AGENCY OR THE U.S ANTI-DRUG AGENCY can afford to foot the 400 dollar bill for every athlete when its more frugal to use blood test and save some money and only then use the more expensive urine test to weed out the cheater?

on the shane thing, if u read what i said about no drug test being able to detect unknown drug you woulda known why its that way EDIT:: I SAID CONTE SNITCH BUT I WAS WRONG.. NOW READ THIS..

".....In 2003, the United States Attorney for the Northern District of California began investigating BALCO. U.S. sprint coach Trevor Graham had given an anonymous phone call to the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) in June 2003 accusing a number of athletes being involved in doping with a steroid that was not detectable at the time. He also named Victor Conte as the source of the steroid. As evidence, Graham delivered a syringe containing traces of tetrahydrogestrinone, nicknamed "the Clear."

Shortly after, Don Catlin, MD, the founder and then-director of the UCLA Olympic Analytical Laboratory and now head of the Los Angeles-based nonprofit organization Anti-Doping Research, succeeded in identifying and developing a testing process for tetrahydrogestrinone (THG). Now able to detect the new substance, he tested 550 existing samples from athletes, of which 20 proved to be positive for THG. Later that year, the Chicago Tribune named Catlin Sportsman of the Year. [2]....."


ITS EXACTLY WHY ALL OF THEM ON THE LIST DIDNT GET CAUGHT.. cus no test existed b4 hand and no urine nor blood nor hair sample could see if it was there even if it was staring right at them...they can test whos on the clear NOW via urine or blood by virtue of the snitcher

. thats how you develop drug test.. it always that way.... no amount of bloodtesting, be it random or not would change the fact it will not detect anything else that urine cant excep when it comes to HGH, which gasses you

LMAO why r u asking me all this anyways. didnt you claim YOURE THE PED- TESTER ?

man youre just a *****.. i gtg to work now dont lick floyd too much cus.. im sure u want him to beat manny right? i feel the same way only i want manny to beat him.. isnt that why u watch him? LMAO peace *****

LMAO BUMP AND READ BIGDUNNN and YESSIR.. lol i thought i was talking to bigdunn.. but yah its ur yessir, later *****s

Thank you for all the information on HGH. What about PEDs that involve blood doping?

[jqSide]

Out of retorts?

Your point is?

[Pacquiao'd]

oh but urine CAN DETECT all PEDS except HGH the gasser and i already promise you the links. it wont be today though cus its time consuming and i might answer u back a couple of hours later


the genesis behind bloodtesting was back in 2000 when they didnt have a urine test to detect HGH, at the same time, HGH was fairly knew, some athletes have been known to use it and why wouldnt they.. it's human growth hormone.. HEY LOOKY LOOKY.. HUMAN GROWTH.. it must enhance your performance somehow since it has growth in it when in reality it doesnt....

this is where the, scientific test have been done to study its effects of this claim comes in and they have found the very opposite, it doesnt help u at all


so bloodtest was invented in 2000 as oppose to urine testing which has been around for 40 years- URINE TEST IS PROBABLY OLDER THAN YOU LOL it has wisdom on what is a drug and what isnt

besides that, blood testing was using as a screening device to find some kind of anomaly in a person's blood signature.. why? because blood test is around 40 bucks and urine test cost 400 dollars.. only when they find an "ANOMOLY" or something out of the ordinary will they then use the more expensive urine
test to test the said athlete on what EXACTLY IT IS that is afoot

now there's over 1000 olympic athletes at any given moment training all year round.. do u think a non-profit organization like the WORLD ANTI DRUG TESTING AGENCY OR THE U.S ANTI-DRUG AGENCY can afford to foot the 400 dollar bill for every athlete when its more frugal to use blood test and save some money and only then use the more expensive urine test to weed out the cheater?

on the shane thing, if u read what i said about no drug test being able to detect unknown drug you woulda known why its that way EDIT:: I SAID CONTE SNITCH BUT I WAS WRONG.. NOW READ THIS..

".....In 2003, the United States Attorney for the Northern District of California began investigating BALCO. U.S. sprint coach Trevor Graham had given an anonymous phone call to the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) in June 2003 accusing a number of athletes being involved in doping with a steroid that was not detectable at the time. He also named Victor Conte as the source of the steroid. As evidence, Graham delivered a syringe containing traces of tetrahydrogestrinone, nicknamed "the Clear."

Shortly after, Don Catlin, MD, the founder and then-director of the UCLA Olympic Analytical Laboratory and now head of the Los Angeles-based nonprofit organization Anti-Doping Research, succeeded in identifying and developing a testing process for tetrahydrogestrinone (THG). Now able to detect the new substance, he tested 550 existing samples from athletes, of which 20 proved to be positive for THG. Later that year, the Chicago Tribune named Catlin Sportsman of the Year. [2]....."


ITS EXACTLY WHY ALL OF THEM ON THE LIST DIDNT GET CAUGHT.. cus no test existed b4 hand and no urine nor blood nor hair sample could see if it was there even if it was staring right at them...they can test whos on the clear NOW via urine or blood by virtue of the snitcher

. thats how you develop drug test.. it always that way.... no amount of bloodtesting, be it random or not would change the fact it will not detect anything else that urine cant excep when it comes to HGH, which gasses you

LMAO why r u asking me all this anyways. didnt you claim YOURE THE PED- TESTER ?

man youre just a *****.. i gtg to work now dont lick floyd too much cus.. im sure u want him to beat manny right? i feel the same way only i want manny to beat him.. isnt that why u watch him? LMAO peace *****

LMAO BUMP AND READ BIGDUNNN

do you know why i didnt respond to your post you decided to post twice?

b/c its a bunch of NONESENSE

many experts on drug testing have spoken, care to discuss PEDs now?

and HGH's and PEds can be flushed from the body in a matter of hours

[1 on 1]

You apparently don't partake in sports nor ever would.

Because if I, suspected a person of using steroids and in a combat sport. I would want him to take a test. For 2 reasons.

1) I dont want to lose.
2) I want to make sure that I'm not being cheated. (it's almost a guaranteed loss fighting someone who does steroids)

So you can go ahead with your faulty ass reasoning. People who don't do sports, specially combat sports, wouldn't understand Mayweather's reasoning for doing what he did.

I think people got so accustomed to blaming Mayweather for everything, it has become 2nd nature. Which is sad as hell.

Suspecting someone and publicly accusing and humiliating someone are two different things, buddy.

Why would you accuse w/o a single iota of proof while you're trying to negotiate a deal ?

Example: "Hey Flicker, you and I can make a lot of $$$ together, but you're using drugs and even bullets bounce off you, so lets take a test together.


Instead of: Hey Flicker, you and I can make a lot of $$$ together, and I have a great idea, I think our fight would be a great stage to introduce Olympic Style testing, we can serve as pioneers in our beloved sport.

Now, doesn't that sound much better. It doesn't guarantee that the other party would agree, but it's alot better than publicly accusing w/o proof in hopes of cornering them.