and doing what he did in his time, holding 3 titles in three divisions,
would he be subjected to the same scrutiny by the same crowd that is trying to **** on Pacquiao?
Now, lets remember, there were no "jr", or "super" divisions in those days, so if you add those divisions, he most likely would have held the
featherweight title,
super featherweight title,
lightweight title,
jr. welterweight title,
& welterweight title,
all at the same time.
Thats a total of 5 divisions he would have been champion in had he been doing the same things today, that he did back then.
So, I ask once again, would the Floyd crowd accuse him of wrongdoing, or would they say its about natural talent and skills?
also, lets not forget, he almost won the middleweight title as well.
would he be subjected to the same scrutiny by the same crowd that is trying to **** on Pacquiao?
Now, lets remember, there were no "jr", or "super" divisions in those days, so if you add those divisions, he most likely would have held the
featherweight title,
super featherweight title,
lightweight title,
jr. welterweight title,
& welterweight title,
all at the same time.
Thats a total of 5 divisions he would have been champion in had he been doing the same things today, that he did back then.
So, I ask once again, would the Floyd crowd accuse him of wrongdoing, or would they say its about natural talent and skills?
also, lets not forget, he almost won the middleweight title as well.
Comment