PROOF Manny is JUICING!!!!!!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mike_R
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2005
    • 1792
    • 59
    • 53
    • 10,033

    #121
    i hope manny wins a ****ton of money in his lawsuit. he doesn't deserve all this slander.

    1 mayweather is pissed off he decimated ricky hatton.

    2 more mayweathers just don't want the fight with him, it really seems that simple. floyd never needed olympic testing before- he only needs it when he needs a reason to complicate and convolute a fightdeal he doesn't actually want to make.

    Comment

    • Xeraser
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Nov 2009
      • 880
      • 17
      • 0
      • 7,567

      #122
      Originally posted by Horus
      Since when is being held to the highest standard possible unnecessary?

      Shouldnt Manny want to prove to the world and his opponent that he is more than willing to be particpate along with Mayweather in the best drug test in the world. The very same drug test olympics athletes use when representing their country.
      The best drug testing is a year round out of competition testing, when an athlete least expects it.

      Floyd's demands are unnecessary. Urine detects steroids and EPO. That leaves HGH and HGH does little.

      Comment

      • -MAKAVELLI-
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Aug 2008
        • 50080
        • 3,580
        • 2,792
        • 169,000

        #123
        Originally posted by Horus
        Mayweather vs. Pacquiao (drug testing)


        ok...i'll let you know when i can make it...no deflamating horus...i mean it

        Comment

        • MaD RoBoT
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Sep 2008
          • 3892
          • 664
          • 362
          • 17,466

          #124
          Originally posted by Horus
          Since when is being held to the highest standard possible unnecessary?

          highest standard? how? care to explain pls

          Comment

          • Horus
            Greatest Of My Era
            • Dec 2007
            • 10220
            • 772
            • 112
            • 18,146

            #125
            Originally posted by Xeraser
            The best drug testing is a year round out of competition testing, when an athlete least expects it.

            Floyd's demands are unnecessary. Urine detects steroids and EPO. That leaves HGH and HGH does little.
            If Urine samples detects EPO, why did Shane Mosley test negative for EPO in the oscar rematch under NSAC Testing Which was fought in Las Vegas at the MGM Grand. After he admitted he used EPO for the oscar rematch to a grand jury?

            HGH does little???
            if that is the case, why is it illegal?

            Comment

            • Xeraser
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Nov 2009
              • 880
              • 17
              • 0
              • 7,567

              #126
              Originally posted by Horus
              If Urine samples detects EPO, why did Shane Mosley test negative for EPO in the oscar rematch under NSAC Testing Which was fought in Las Vegas at the MGM Grand. After he admitted he used EPO for the oscar rematch to a grand jury?

              HGH does little???
              if that is the case, why is it illegal?
              Mosley took only after the fight urine test. It takes about 2 weeks for EPO to take effect and about a few days window to be detected. If Mosley took it 2 weeks prior than it would left his system by the time of test.

              HGH is banned and so does Marijuana and *******.
              Last edited by Xeraser; 01-04-2010, 04:04 AM.

              Comment

              • Horus
                Greatest Of My Era
                • Dec 2007
                • 10220
                • 772
                • 112
                • 18,146

                #127
                Originally posted by Xeraser
                Mosley took only the after the fight urine test. It takes about 2 weeks for EPO to take effect and about a week window to be detected. If Mosley took it 2 weeks prior than it would left his system by the time of test.

                HGH is banned and so does Marijuana and *******.
                NSAC has always tested fighters before fights and after fights.
                NSAC DRUG TESTING RULES




                if this statement is wrong, feel free to prove me wrong.
                the fact of the matter is Mosley beat their test and he was on epo.
                Last edited by Horus; 01-04-2010, 04:02 AM.

                Comment

                • Xeraser
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 880
                  • 17
                  • 0
                  • 7,567

                  #128
                  Originally posted by Horus
                  NSAC has always tested fighters before fights and after fights.
                  NSAC DRUG TESTING RULES




                  if this statement is wrong, feel free to prove me wrong.
                  the fact of the matter is Mosley beat their test and he was on epo.
                  They let the fighter know when they take the test, that's the big difference and they also set a time frame.
                  Last edited by Xeraser; 01-04-2010, 04:15 AM.

                  Comment

                  • Horus
                    Greatest Of My Era
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 10220
                    • 772
                    • 112
                    • 18,146

                    #129
                    Originally posted by Xeraser
                    They let the fighter know when they take the test, that's the big difference and they also set a time frame.
                    thats why we need random test. To stop epo users like mosley

                    Comment

                    • LAPIDA
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 1282
                      • 6
                      • 1
                      • 7,375

                      #130
                      Originally posted by Horus
                      go read what i wrote.
                      Why sue Mayweather, and not Paulie?
                      The Mayweathers were the one who opened up the pandora's box.
                      Paulie might come soon if he will answer the same allegations if you will ask him right now.
                      Why fight Paulie, and not Mayweather?
                      It's all about economics. How can you ensure a bigger fight with the Mayweathers when they demanded something only santa claus can give? You have to study the history of the negotiations so that you can understand why it came to this point.

                      First, after the fight with Miguel Cotto, everybody wanted a Pacman-Mayweather fight. Pacman did not called out Mayweather's name for his next fight and left it to Arum to decide which fighter Pacman would face next. At that point, Pacman and his team decided that the next fight would happen after May 2010. Preferably September 2010 or later.
                      Next, the negotiation happened. Both parties agreed not to disclose anything to the public what transpired during the negotiation. There were five major points that both parties disagreed.
                      1st: Weight
                      2nd: Purse Split
                      3rd: Gloves
                      4th: Penalty for exceeding the agreed weight
                      5th: Date of the fight
                      Never in the beginning of the negotiation where they demanded the rigid blood testings. What they agreed only is rigid testing in accordance to the requirements of the boxing commission who will cover it. During that time it was not yet determined which place will host the fight (dallas, new york, or las vegas). But what was mutually agreed was that both parties will submit to the requirements of anti-doping testings as required by the boxing commission which will cover the fight.

                      Now, the main issue on the split purse came. It was settled at 50-50.
                      Then, the date of the fight. First, Mayweather wanted the fight to be on 13th March. Surprisingly, contrary to the previous pronouncement of the Pacman team, Pacman agreed to fight on March 13, 2010 fresh from the Cotto fight last November 2009.
                      Then came the boxing gloves and the penalty. When pacman team demanded that reyes puncher's gloves be used and that there would be 10 Million USD penalty for exceeding the agreed weight, the Mayweather team retaliated by demanding a more rigid anti-doping testings in accordance with USADA, not by the already agreed procedure per boxing commission's. There goes the deadlock. Pacman team rejected the demand of Mayweather team for a more stringent testings. Days after this deadlock news broke out, the Mayweather then announced that they would agree with the gloves to be used and the 10Million penalty "if pacman would agree with the testing that they wanted".

                      So, if you trace it all back, Mayweather used that "blood testing" requirement to counter-demand from Pacman. It has nothing to do with ensuring a fair fight.

                      Now, you answer this question.

                      If Mayweather's intention is to really ensure that there is a fair fight, why then he did not require this kind of more stringent anti-doping test requirements when he fought Corrales, JMM, ODLH and even Hatton??? If you can answer that truthfully, then i will listen to your radio station day after day after day, but i guess your guess is just as good as mine.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP